DB A Contract Lucy v ZehmerIn Lucy v Zehmer See Link Lucy v ZehmerLinks to 5134

Business CC 10 Sec EN2

Question.5134 - DB #5: A Contract? Lucy v. ZehmerIn Lucy v. Zehmer (See Link: Lucy v ZehmerLinks to an external site.), the Zehmer's are required by the court to sell the family farm to the Lucy's. Do you agree with the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia? Why or Why Not? Please explain your response in a paragraph or two. Also, respond to the posting of two other students in the class. (grading: 15 points for your original post, 5 points each for your comments to two other classmates.)The due date is: 11:59 PM, Tuesday, April 15, 2025. Thank you. Reply

Answer Below:

Issue xxx fundamental xxxxx question xx the xxxx v xxxxxx case xxxxxxx on xxxxxxx written xxxxxxxxxx for xxxx transactions xxxxxx valid xxxx Zehmer xxxxxxx his xxxxxxxxxx were x joke xxx Lucy xxxxxxxxx it xx a xxxxxxx business xxxx Rule xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx law xxx formation xx contracts xxxxxxx on xxxxxx assent xxxxxxx external xxxxxxxxxxx rather xxxx evaluating xxxxxx intentions xxxxx on xxx objective xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx Contract xxxxxxxx depends xx whether xx offer xxx its xxxxxxxxxx exhibit xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx to xx impartial xxxxxxxx even xx the xxxxxxxxxxx parties xxxxxxxx did xxx intend xx create xxxxx obligations xxxxxxxxxxx Zehmer xxxxx and xxxxxx a xxxxxxx agreement xxxx transferred xxx Ferguson xxxx to xxxx for xxxxx his xxxx also xxxxx her xxxxxxxxx to xxx document xxxxxxx examination xxx court xxxxxxxxxx Zehmer xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx demeanor xx Lucy xxxxxx their xxxxxxxxxxxx meeting xxxx though xx later xxxxxx his xxxxxxxxxx were x joke xxxxx under xxx influence xxx written xxxx with xxxxxxxxxx on xxx agreement xxxxxxxxx to xxxx the xxxxxxxx regarding xxxxxx stronger xx the xxxxxxxxxx party xxx court xxxxx that xxxx should xxxx recognized xxx contract's xxxxxxxxxxxx because xx its xxxxxxx nature xxxxxxxx thoughts xxxxx jesting xx drinking xxxxx not xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx displayed xxxxxxxxx that xx made xxxxxxxxxx My xxxxxxxx supports xxx decision xxxx by xxxxxxxxxx Supreme xxxxx of xxxxxxx Written xxxxxxxxxx rely xx sound xxxxxxxxxxxxxx principles xxxxxxx of xxxxx legal xxxxxxxxxxx status xxx right xx parties xx cancel xxxxxxxxx using xxxxxxxxxxx intentional xxxxxxx would xxxxxx a xxxxxxx environment xxx contractual xxxxxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxx strategic xxxxxxxxxxxx opportunities xxx actions xx Zehmer xxxxxxx sufficient xxxxxxx for xxxx to xxxxx that xxx transaction xxx authentic xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxx enforceable xxxxxxxx