Question.2868 - Case Packet: Curled Metal Inc.--Engineered Products Division I will be responsible for the Test Results part of the case packet. It'll need to be about the pros and cons of their tests and recommend a better testing method. It's very important that we stick to the topic of testing. The paper should be at least 3 paragraphs and include an original, insightful, and unique exhibit.
Answer Below:
The tests conducted by Curled Metal Inc. (CMI) on their cushion pads for pile driving involved comparing the performance of conventional pads with CMI pads. Here are the tests and their pros and cons: Kendrick Test: The test involved driving 300 piles using conventional pads initially and then switching to CMI pads for the remaining piles. Pros: The CMI pads lasted for the entire job, eliminating the downtime required for changing pads. CMI pads drove piles 33% faster than conventional pads. CMI pads maintained lower temperatures, reducing the risk of accidents and saving time. Cons: The test results were considered unusual, and there was uncertainty about CMI pads' performance in larger sizes. The extrapolation of the test results to claim 10 times longer set life and a 20% performance increase could be optimistic. Test with Corey Construction: The test involved driving 300 45-foot piles in Pennsylvania. Pros: The Corey Construction Test aimed to validate the findings of the Kendrick Company Test, providing an additional data point to support the performance claims of CMI's cushion pads. By conducting the test in a different job with potentially different pile sizes, the performance of CMI pads could be evaluated in various conditions. Cons: The cost of CMI pads ($120 per set) used by Corey Construction is higher compared to conventional pads, which were not charged separately. This higher initial cost may deter some contractors who are more focused on immediate expenses rather than long-term benefits. Corey Construction required 50 sets of pads compared to only one set with CMI pads, indicating more frequent pad replacements and potential disruptions to workflow. When considering a better testing method for the cushion pads, it's crucial to focus on evaluating their performance accurately and reliably. Here's a recommended testing method: Controlled Laboratory Testing: Conduct controlled laboratory tests to assess the cushion pads' performance under controlled conditions. This approach allows for precise measurements and eliminates external factors that could influence the results. The following steps can be taken: Design specialized test equipment. Standardize variables for consistent testing. Test various pad types, including CMI and competitors. Measure performance metrics like force transmission and durability. 2. Real-world Field Testing: Once the laboratory testing is completed, it is important to validate the performance of the cushion pads in actual field conditions. This step ensures that the pads can withstand the challenges encountered on construction sites. Consider the following: Collaborate with construction companies. Select diverse project sites with varying conditions. Monitor and collect data on driving time, temperature, etc. Compare results with laboratory testing for consistency. Combining controlled laboratory testing with real-world field testing ensures a thorough evaluation of the cushion pads' performance. It allows for objective comparisons between different pad types and provides valuable insights for further product development and market positioning. References: Curated Metal Inc. Available at: file:///E:/AUDIT/work/Curled_Metal_Inc.pdf (Accessed: 19 June 2023).More Articles From Business Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
