Question.1201 - 1. When Rorsted says he is looking to find out about the personal part, not just the professional part, of a job applicant, what does he mean? 2. How does what Rorsted describes as the personal part of an employee relate to emotional intelligence? How about civility? 3. Rorsted explains that he wants to know how people have responded to setbacks. How does this relate to emotional intelligence? 4. He distinguishes between a good manager and a good leader. In two or three paragraphs, describe some characteristics that would distinguish a good leader from a good manager in terms of interpersonal communication, emotional intelligence, and/or civility.
Answer Below:
1. From the applicant's personal life, the valuable things that will implement work in his life and professional way. The applicant quickly adapts to the job or wants to learn more about the job. Rorsted had no belief in people with first class in the person; they had their own perspective and comfort boundaries in life. However, people with lots of experience can quickly adapt to the requirements. So, knowing a person in detail is better than the academic grades for the job requirement. 2. It is connected with emotional intelligence on a personal level, particularly in terms of how they handle conflicts, if the same level of interpersonal skills could be added to overcoming difficulties within an organizational setting. It is essential to be professional in handling problematic situations in one's personal life; it shows civility by assessing how to handle the situation in a respectful manner that will put someone in a significant position. 3. Rorsted explains that people have straightforwardness in their personal and professional lives, which helps an employer understand how ready they are to dynamically position interpersonal values, self-awareness, empathy, leadership qualities, and problem-solving skills - into varying operational scenarios rather than being a bookworm within their comfort zone. 4. Firstly, the primary objective that differentiates a leader from a manager is being a visionary; they draft a pathway for the entire team, unlike managing their workflow, while managers focus on organization structuring, staffing, and budging - here, the vision of managers are focusing towards planning and implementing strategies of the leaders. Secondly, managers use tactical procedures to break down coordinated goals. At the same time, leaders focus on aligning the team to perform individually. Lastly, managers access and analyze the setbacks collectively such that further mishaps do not occur while leaders question the decisions made individually by the team members.More Articles From Business Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
