Question.5452 - 1. Who prevails and why? 2. Name a case from this chapter that supports your answer. 3. If Jerry Schuster changed the name of the business but still used the tools he inherited, how would that impact your analysis?
Answer Below:
Case Study Assignment 4: Vernon v. Schuster LAW301: Business Law for Managers Case Study 4: Termination of Sole Proprietorship - Vernon v. SchusterIss...
Case xxxxx Assignment xxxxxx v xxxxxxxx LAW xxxxxxxx Law xxx Managers xxxx Study xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxx Proprietorship x Vernon x SchusterIssueThe xxxx issue xx whether xxxxx Schuster xxx continued xxxxxxxxx his xxxx father x business xxxxxxxx Heating xxx Plumbing xx legally xxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx warranty xxx service xxxxxxxxx made xx his xxxxxx James xxxxxxxx before xxx death xxxxxxxxx business xxx a xxxx proprietorship xx not x separate xxxxx entity xxxx its xxxxx it xxxxxxxxxx upon xxx owner x death xxxxxx The xxxxxxxx liabilities xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx of x sole xxxxxxxxxx do xxx automatically xxxxxxxx to xxxxx or xxxxxxxxxx unless xxx business xx legally xxxxxxxxxxxx e x as x partnership xx corporation xxx continuation xx business xx another xxxxxxxxxx constitutes x new xxx distinct xxxxx enterprise xxxxxx Additionally xxxxxxxxx may xxxx transfer xx the xxxxxxxxx expressly xxxxxxx the xxxxx obligations xx represents xxx business xx a xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx old xxx which xxxxx give xxxx to xxxxxxxx authority xx implied xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx Melvin xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx James xxxxxxxx s xxxx proprietorship xxxxxx to xxxxx at xxx death xxxxxxxx Jerry xxxxxxxx continued xxxxxxxxx under xxx same xxxxx name xxx served xxx same xxxxxxx he xxx not xxxxxxxx assume xxx father x contractual xxxxxxxxxxx Thus xxx service xxxxxxxxx and xxxxx warranty xxxx personal xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx Schuster x sole xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Under xxxxx facts xxxxx s xxxxxxxxx of xxx business xxxxx his xxxxxx s xxxxx establishes x new xxxxxxxx not x legal xxxxxxxxxxxx Therefore xx is xxx bound xx contracts xxxxxxx into xx his xxxxxx s xxxxxxxxxxxxxx unless xx explicitly xxxxxx to xxxxx them x supporting xxxxxxxxx can xx drawn xx analogy xxxx Branch x Mullineaux xxxxxx ch xxxxx individuals xxxx held xxxxxxxxxx liable xxx contracts xxxx before xxxxxxxxx formation xxxx reinforces xxxx liability xxxxxxxx only xx the xxxxxxxxxxx party xx this xxxx the xxxxxxxx sole xxxxxxxxxx not xxx successor xxxxxxxxxxxxx court xxxxxxxxx held xxxx Jerry xxxxxxxx is xxx liable xxx his xxxxxx s xxxxxxxx obligations xxx sole xxxxxxxxxxxxxx terminated xxxx James xxxxxxxx s xxxxx and xxxxx s xxxxxxxxxx operation xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx legal xxxxxx with xx duty xx fulfill xxxxxxxxxxx contracts xxxxxxx Analysis xxxx Change xxxxxxxx If xxxxx had xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx name xxx continued xxxxx the xxxx tools xxx serving xxx same xxxxxxxxx this xxxxx not xxxxx the xxxxx conclusion xxx key xxxxx is xxxxx continuity xxx branding xxxxxxx a xxxxxx assumption xx liabilities x new xxxx proprietorship xxxx under xxxxxxx operations xxxxx still xx considered x distinct xxxxxxxx under xxx ReferencesMelvin x P xxx Legal xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx A xxxxxxxxxx Approach xxx Branch x Mullineaux x Y xxxx Op x N x Sup xx JulyMore Articles From Management
At CoachOnCouch, we are dedicated to delivering top-notch services that help you achieve your goals. We provide tailored solutions that drive results. Contact us now!
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
