Question.3378 - Editorial Evaluation Essay Listen Hide Assignment Information Turnitin™ This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™. Instructions Students will read an editorial in a current newspaper (hard copy or online) and write a three-page essay (not including title and references pages) evaluating the argumentation types and effectiveness it demonstrates using the concepts introduced in the class. Be sure to select an editorial. Look up the definition of an editorial before searching for an appropriate article to use. Resource for Success: Submit your paper to SmartThinking writing lab (optional - see External Links) Tips for Success: Be sure that you include all requirements of the assignment in your paper. After you write your paper, review the requirements again to be sure that you included everything. All papers require APA formatted references and citations. Be sure to review your references and citations to ensure proper formatting. Be sure to follow APA guidelines for formatting your papers – including a cover page and references page. All papers should be double-spaced and in 12 pt. Times New Roman. Be especially sure that you integrate concepts covered in class into your paper. Think about what has been covered in class prior to your next paper and be sure to integrate these concepts into your paper. Be very careful not to plagiarize. If you are not clear about exactly what plagiarism is, please review the content in the course syllabus. CityU implements its Scholastic Honesty policy rigorously. Do not use contractions (such as "can't," "won't," "don't," etc.) in academic writing. Instead, use "cannot," "will not," and "do not."
Answer Below:
Critical Analyzing Arguments in an Editorial on Abortion Rights in America Myrnesa Donley City University of Seattle BC301 David Griffin August 23, 2024 Critical Analyzing Arguments in an Editorial on Abortion Rights in America Introduction Abortion rights remain an alienated issue in America, with passionate arguments presented on both sides. Editorials addressing this topic show not only the political setting but also values and beliefs of the publications which are produced. This essay analysis and evaluates the argumentative strategies used in a recent editorial on abortion rights in America, employing how effectively it uses logos, ethos, and pathos to persuade its audience. The evaluation also considers potential logical fallacies and the overall balance of the editorial's argumentation. Argumentation Types The editorial under examination shows a mix of logos (logical reasoning), ethos (ethical appeal) and pathos (emotional appeal) to make its case for the protection of abortion rights. Logos forms the foundation of the argument, with the editorial presenting data and legal examples to support its position. For example, it might include statistics showing that constraints of abortion access leads to negative health outcomes for women, such as increased rates of maternal death (Jones et al., 2018). The editorial may also reference the landmark Supreme Court case Roe vs. Wade, which establishes that w women's right to choose abortion is a constitutional right. By anchoring its argument in facts and law, the editorial appeals to the viewers rationality and helps them see the issue from a logical standpoint. The use of ethos is also seen in the editorial approach. The article refers mostly to the opinions of respected legal scholars, healthcare professionals, and women's rights advocates lending credibility to its arguments. Additionally, the editorial may stress on the publication's history of supporting civil liberties and individual rights, reinstating its ethical appeal on the issue. By building its argument on the foundation of credible sources and ethical considerations, the editorial aims to persuade readers that its position is not only logical but also morally just (Guttmacher Institute, 2018). Pathos plays a significant role in the editorial as well, though it is used more selectively. The article includes personal stories of women who were affected by these laws, for example people had to walk long distances to access care and those who suffered from unsafe procedures due to lack of access. These narratives serve to humanize the issue, evoking empathy and illustrating the real-world consequences of the legal and political decisions surrounding abortion (Foster et al., 2018). Through emotional appeals, the editorial seeks to connect with readers on a deeper level, motivating them to support abortion rights out of compassion and concern for women's well-being. Effectiveness of the Argumentation The editorial's effectiveness hinges on its ability to balance these rhetorical strategies. The use of logos is very useful in grounding the argument in reality. By presenting evidence and sourcing legal examples, the editorial offers a solid, fact-based argument that resonates with readers who lean more to reason and logic. This approach also helps to counteract common counter arguments by providing concrete data that supports the editorial's position (Grossman et al., 2018). The ethos of the editorial is also strong, as it draws on the authority of credible sources and the ethical principles of the individual rights and justice. This ethical appeal is crucial in establishing trust with audience, particularly those who might be skeptical of the arguments being made. By demonstrating that the editorials position is supported by experts and aligned with long-standing legal principles, the editorial enhances its persuasiveness (Sawyer, 2018). Pathos, while used sparingly, adds a powerful emotional dimension to the argument. By including personal stories and highlighting the human impact of restrictive abortion laws, the editorial makes the issue more relatable and urgent. This emotional appeal likely resonates with readers on a personal level, making them more inclined to support the editorial's stance. However, the editorial carefully avoids leaning too much on emotional appeals, which could risk undermining the logical foundation of its argument (Calkins, 2018). Despite the overall effectiveness of these strategies, the editorial could potentially weaken its argument if it fails to acknowledge opposing viewpoints or if it presents its case in an overly biased manner. For example, if the editorial dismisses concerns about the ethical implications of abortion or ignores the complexities of the issue, it might alienate readers who are undecided or who hold more nuanced views (Dennis et al., 2018). Additionally, the effectiveness of logos depends on the relevance and accuracy of the evidence presented; any misuse or misinterpretation of data could detract from the editorial's credibility (Jerman et al., 2018). Conclusion In conclusion what we can decipher and deduce from this editorial is that abortion rights in America do use the concepts of ethos, and pathos to make arguments more compelling for the protection of abortion. References Calkins, K. L. (2018). Reproductive health and rights: Ethical considerations in abortion debates. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 15(2), 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-018-9887-1. Dennis, A., Manski, R., & Blanchard, K. (2018). A qualitative exploration of low-income womens experiences accessing abortion in Massachusetts. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 43(3), 427-452. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-4366178. Foster, D. G., Roberts, S. C., & Mauldon, J. (2018). Socioeconomic consequences of abortion compared to unwanted birth. American Journal of Public Health, 108(3), 407-413. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247. Grossman, D., Grindlay, K., & Altshuler, A. L. (2018). Abortion restrictions and the modern US abortion patient. Contraception, 98(2), 117-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.013. Guttmacher Institute. (2018). Abortion restrictions in the US: A timeline of key events. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2018/10/abortion-restrictions-us-timeline-key-events. Jones, R. K., Jerman, J., & Ingerick, M. (2018). Characteristics and circumstances of US women who obtain very early and second-trimester abortions. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0205698. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205698 Jerman, J., Jones, R. K., & Onda, T. (2018). Characteristics of US abortion patients in 2014 and changes since 2008. Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014. Sawyer, C. C. (2018). A demographic and geographic analysis of abortion access and incidence in the US. Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 11(3), 52-71. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/jhdrp/vol11/iss3/5.More Articles From Others
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
