Question.3759 - As a part of a new fact-finding commission, you have been asked to decide whether the department of corrections or an independent agency should have authority over release decisions. Where would you place that authority and why?
Answer Below:
In deciding whether the department of corrections or an independent agency should have authority over release decisions, I would place that authority with an independent agency. This approach enhances objectivity and accountability in the decision-making process. When the same entity responsible for confinement also oversees release, there is a risk of bias, where institutional goals may overshadow individual rehabilitation needs. An independent agency can evaluate cases based on established criteria, free from potential conflicts of interest. This separation allows for a more nuanced understanding of each individuals circumstances, including their rehabilitation progress and readiness for reintegration into society. Research indicates that such independent oversight can lead to better outcomes in terms of recidivism rates and successful community reintegration (Petersilia, 2003; Tonry, 1997). Moreover, an independent agency can incorporate diverse perspectives and expertise, such as social workers and mental health professionals, ensuring that decisions are informed by a holistic view of the individuals needs. This collaborative approach not only supports the individual but also benefits the community by promoting public safety and reducing recidivism. Ultimately, placing authority in an independent agency fosters a more just and effective correctional system. References: Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. Tonry, M. H. (1997).?Sentencing matters. Oxford University Press.More Articles From Others
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
