Question.3735 - What are the key ideas in this section? What kinds of sources are credible and which ones are questionable? What criteria should be used to ensure sources are credible? How can a researcher identify key points and arguments in sources? What are the 5 W's and how can they help you evaluate sources? What to Post: By Wednesday of week 10, create a discussion post: Choose 2 “golden lines” that either surprise you, confuse you, make you think of something that you already know, or relate to one of the above questions. Quote the golden lines using MLA style citation format and thoroughly explain why you chose each golden line. Your discussion post should be 200-300 words.
Answer Below:
One golden line that stands out is: How did a book with errors like these come to be used as part of the curriculum, and who was at fault? (Washington Post). This line provokes thoughts about accountability in education. It raises questions about the vetting process for educational materials and highlights the potential consequences of using unreliable sources in academic settings. The implications extend beyond this specific case; they challenge us to consider how we assess the credibility of information we encounter daily. Another impactful line is: Using inaccurate, irrelevant, or poorly researched sources can affect the quality of your own work (Washington Post). This statement focuses on the ripple effect on research integrity due to poor sourcing. It is to remind researchers that they are not just responsible for their own work but also to the broader academic community to ensure that the sources used by them are credible and accurate. In evaluating sources, researchers should apply criteria including quality, accuracy, relevance, bias, and reputation. The 5 Ws: who, what, when, where, and why; can also guide this evaluation by prompting researchers to consider the source's origin, context, and purpose, thereby enhancing their critical thinking skills in source selection. Text Cited: Washington Post. "Virginia Textbook's Errors Spark Controversy." *The Washington Post*, 19 Oct. 2010, www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/19/AR2010101907974.html.More Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
