Question.750 - Part I: Initial Post Research Go to the library tab in Canvas and follow these steps: Access the ENG102 Library Course Guide Links to an external site.. Once you are on the library course guide, scroll down to find the theme you are choosing to explore in this class. Themes include the following: Closing the Gap Between College and Career Closing the Gap Between Military Service and Civilian Career Science Writing and the Public (Secular Science) Enterprising America and the World Select a guide and a database. Search key terms for your topic of interest. Be sure to record these terms as you will report the terms used in this discussion. Choose one of the articles to read for this discussion. Think Closely read and annotate the article you choose. What information seems most significant? Why? What is the author’s claim or thesis? What details are important? Do any words or phrases stand out? Why? What do you still want to know? What questions do you have as you read? Write Post your initial response: In this discussion response, write a short summary (5-7 sentences) of the most important points of information in the article. Then, write a short response (5-7 sentences) to the article, discussing the significance of those main points. Remember that a summary should be comprised of only your own words. Create a References entry, formatted in APA Style, for the article you chose. Conclude your post with any questions you have about searching the databases or choosing articles and note the key terms you used in your database search.
Answer Below:
Scientific grant application writing: Re/packaging text to enhance its impact One significant piece of information in the article is the emphasis on the importance of effectively communicating the potential impact and significance of a research project in a grant application. It is significant because it highlights the need for researchers to carefully consider how their proposed project aligns with the funding agency's goals and priorities and clearly and concisely explain the potential contributions of their research to the broader field of study. The authors' claim or thesis is that the language and structure used in grant applications can significantly impact their chances of being funded. They argue that it is crucial for researchers to carefully consider how they present their research to communicate its value and potential impact effectively. Necessary details include the strategies the authors recommend for effectively communicating the significance and value of a research project in a grant application. Describe how the research aligns with the funding agency's goals and priorities, using clear and concise language and organizing the content logically and coherently. Words and phrases that stand out include "re/packaging," which refers to the process of presenting research in a grant application, and "persuasive," which highlights the need for researchers to effectively argue for the value of their research to secure funding. I still want to know more about the specific strategies the authors recommend for organizing and structuring the content of a grant application (Stenglin & Cléirigh, 2020). The information about how to use language to make the writing more engaging, effective, and persuasive (Stenglin & Cléirigh, 2020). Questions I have as I read include: What are some specific examples of how researchers can effectively explain the potential impact of their research? How can researchers avoid using jargon in grant applications? What common mistakes do researchers make when writing grant applications, and how can these be avoided? The article "Scientific Grant Application Writing: Re/Packaging Text to Enhance Its Impact" (Stenglin & Cléirigh, 2020) discusses the role of language and structure in effectively communicating the significance and value of a research project in a grant application. The authors argue that it is crucial for researchers to carefully consider how they present their research to communicate its value and potential impact to funding agencies effectively. Critical strategies for achieving this include explaining how the research aligns with the funding agency's goals and priorities (Stenglin & Cléirigh, 2020), using clear and concise language, and organizing the content logically and coherently. The information presented in this article (Stenglin & Cléirigh, 2020) is significant for researchers seeking funding for their projects, as it provides practical guidance on effectively communicating their research's value and potential impact (Stenglin & Cléirigh, 2020). By following these recommendations, researchers can increase their chances of securing funding for their projects and ensure that their research is widely recognized and supported. Reference Stenglin, M., & Cléirigh, C. (2020). Scientific grant application writing: Re/packaging text to enhance its impact. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100823.More Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
