Question.3354 - Explain to your boss (real or imagined) what you understand Roland Barthes to mean by studium. Be sure to share with your boss those parts of Barthes’ claims about studium that you still have questions about, and then tell your boss whether or not you think studium is indeed a meaningful part of the experience of looking at photographs for you. Next, please explain to your best friend (real or imagined) what you understand Roland Barthes to mean by punctum. Be sure to share with your friend those parts of Barthes’ claims about punctum that you still have questions about, and then tell your friend whether or not you think punctum is indeed a meaningful part of the experience of looking at photographs for you. Then describe the following photograph: Once you have offered your description, briefly reflect on what the studium in the photograph is. Describe this studium by identifying which of the five studium functions it contains. Finally, does this photograph contain punctum for you? If it does, describe this punctum by locating the detail in the image that evokes a pain specific to you and you alone. If it does not, explain why this photograph does not possess punctum in your estimation. Finally, what questions do you still have about the concepts of studium and punctum? Share at least three of them here.
Answer Below:
"Studium", as Roland Barthes' concept refers, mainly talks about the cultural, linguistic, and political interpretation of a photograph. It is that concept of a photograph which is accessible to everyone and makes the viewer understand the context and meaning behind the image. A broad audience can understand or appreciate the stadium as it involves general, coded meaning that the photographer intended to communicate. However, I still have questions about Barthes' claims regarding the studium. My questions remain as I wonder how Barthes differentiates between the cultural codes that are universally understood and those that might be more subjective. Studium is also a great criterion to look at the photographs. It helps us to grasp the broader context and significance of the image. To understand the photographer’s intent and create a connection with the subject matter, studium is indeed an essential part. Explanation of Punctum to Best Friend “Punctum” is what refers to the element of a photograph that pierces or wounds the viewer on a personal level, according to Roland Barthes' concept. Studium is normally general, cultural meaning whereas punctum stands for more detail stuff which stands out and creates a more personal, emotional response. Barthes’ claim about punctum makes me curious. I often wonder how he distinguishes between a universally impactful detail and one that is purely personal. Also, I get astonished thinking how punctum interacts with all the compositions present in a photograph and if it can really overshadow the intended stadium. Punctum, as a whole, transforms the viewing experience, especially from passive observation to active, emotional engagement. Therefore, it is a meaningful part of looking at photographs. Description and Analysis of "August Sander, Pastry Cook (1928)" A pastry cook is standing in his work attire, holding a rolling pin, in the photograph of “August Sander, Pastry Cook (1928).” The focus goes straight to the subject as the background is plain and simple. The cook’s posture and the tools he holds clearly send the message about the profession he is into and his dedication to the same, but he has not given any expression in the picture. Talking about the stadium in this photograph includes the cultural and professional sight of the baker or pastry cook. This photograph indicates the essence of a working-class individual, along with some insight into his occupation and the time he is from. It contains several studium functions, which are the subject’s professional identity, a historical context from the time of 1920s and last but not least; it represents the social class. For me, this photograph does not contain punctum. While it is a well-composed and historically significant image, it does not evoke a personal, emotional response. The details, such as the cook's attire and tools, are interesting but do not pierce me in a way that creates a unique, subjective experience. Questions About Studium and Punctum In a same photograph how does Barthes address different punctum to experience for different viewers? A photograph having multiple punctum elements. Is it possible? if so, how these multiple punctum elements interact with each other and the overall studium?More Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
