Question.3726 - Purpose--Why do this? The purpose of this peer review discussion is to share your draft with a peer so that you will be able to see it through their eyes. It is often very difficult for us to see confusing or problematic places in our own writing--this is why we do peer review and why professional writers always seek feedback from peers before publishing their pieces. Also, reading the work of others can help us reflect on the rhetorical moves we have (or haven't ) made in our own writing. Objectives--What will I learn? Reflect on the requirements of the Mini Argument Synthesis Create a clear plan for revising your Mini Argument Synthesis Help your peer create a clear plan for revising their Mini Argument Synthesis Instructions--How should I do this? By Sunday of week 9, complete a peer review using these instructions and attach your peer review to a discussion post below. Remember that you and your peer posted your complete drafts in a different discussion forum here. Your peer review must be a Word Doc or a PDF so that your peer is able to open it. Inside the discussion post, write your assigned peer a brief note letting them know your overall impression of their paper. Be kind, but also make sure that your advice is helpful. Make sure to use their name, so they can easily find your post. By Sunday of week 9, upload your peer review into this peer review assignment so that I can grade it for you. Use the feedback your peer gave you to revise your complete draft. Revised drafts of mini argument synthesis assignment is due on Sunday of week 10. Here are the assigned Peer review pairs: The first person will review the second person's paper, the second person will review the third person's paper, and the third person will review the first person's paper. See the samples below
Answer Below:
Peer Review for Davina Dickison Grading is Not the Only Thing That Needs to Change in Schools Reviewed by Logan Vanderhoof 10/14/24 Strengths: Davinas essay presents a compelling argument about the need for reform in educational grading systems. The thesis is clear and takes a strong stand, emphasizing the role of both teachers and students in achieving educational success. The essay effectively integrates various sources, providing solid evidence to support her claims, particularly regarding the concepts of grit and growth mindset. Thesis: The thesis of the essay can be paraphrased as follows: "To improve student outcomes, both grading systems and teacher engagement must change." This thesis is strong and clear, addressing the assignment prompt while establishing a firm direction for the paper. It is expressed in grammatically correct sentences. Says and Does Outline: Paragraph 1 Says: Introduces the topic of grading and its impact on education. Does: Uses personal reflection to establish credibility and engage readers. Paragraph 2 Says: Discusses Adam Ellwanger's views on contract grading. Does: Employs anecdotal evidence to highlight issues with current teaching practices. Paragraph 3 Says: Explains Angela Duckworth's concept of grit. Does: Utilizes definitions and quotes to clarify key terms. Paragraph 4 Says: Presents Paul L. Thomas's counterarguments regarding grit. Does: Engages in critical analysis by contrasting differing viewpoints. Paragraph 5 Says: Advocates for a growth mindset among teachers. Does: Suggests practical changes to teaching methods based on research. Advice for Revision: To strengthen your essay, do consider tightening your arguments by eliminating some repetitive phrases. Moreover, integrating more specific examples from your personal experiences could enhance your credibility further. Lastly, ensure that each paragraph transitions smoothly to maintain a cohesive flow throughout the essay.More Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
