Question.749 - Summary Response Essay Introduction In Module 1, you were asked to review the assignment instruction for the Module 8 Portfolio Project. The themes for this course include: Closing the Gap Between College and Career Closing the Gap Between Military Service and Civilian Career Science Writing and the Public (Secular Science) Enterprising America and the World You will choose a theme path in this module and will develop and build on this theme path throughout your course of study in this class. As an academic writer, it is vital to form a working thesis about your topic early, so that you can shape your research and form an inquiry plan about the research material that you will be using. Keeping this in mind, you will need to select and analyze key concepts of the topic early in the research process. As such, be cognizant of the theses or the claims made by the authors who write in your chosen path as you read the literature tied to your theme. Instructions For this Critical Thinking Assignment, you are to develop a summary response essay. This should build on the work you submitted to the discussion board for this week. Be sure to accurately decipher your assignment. Review the following link for more information on this topic: Decode Your AssignmentLinks to an external site.Instructions for writing a summary response paper are included in the lecture. Be sure to refer to these prior to delving into the content of your paper. Your paper should accomplish the following: Introduction: Thesis statement, information about the article. Be sure to note key information in the article: author, time and place of publication, and article title. Be sure to note the main thesis of the article that includes the authors' key ideas and intentions. Summary: Your analysis of the article. Be sure to write in the objective third person. Refer to the author and not the article during your examination of key points as articles are inanimate. Response (body paragraphs): Note where you agree, or disagree with ideas, and points the author asserts in the article. Be sure to paraphrase and cite in-text as you develop academic paragraphs that have a topic sentence, evidence, and analysis of the ideas you are exploring. Conclusion: Note the main implications of the article, any gaps you see in the research, or where you think you can look further for information. Expand on your group discussion post in which you summarized an article. Submit this draft to the HYPERLINK "https://csuglobal.libguides.com/writingcenter/smarthinking" \t "_blank" Smarthinking Links to an external site.tutors. Consider using the live session option as the tutors are available 24/7 and you will receive immediate feedback. Required element to turn in with the draft of your essay: Feedback from HYPERLINK "https://csuglobal.libguides.com/writingcenter/smarthinking" \t "_blank" Smarthinking Links to an external site.tutorsRequirements: Length: 2-3-pages (not counting the title and reference pages, which you must include) Use the third person Links to an external site.. Assert your academic voice. Cite at least one source for this assignment. You will have to cite several peer-reviewed credible sources in your final portfolio project, so start exploring sources now and start saving them to a reference management system. Mendeley (free) and RefWorks (fee-based) are good resources. In academic writing, it is always best practice to cite credible sources, such as a scholarly journal article. Your work here in this paper can lead to building content for your final paper due at the end of the course, so be cognizant about source quality. The CSU Global Library is an excellent place to search for credible, scholarly sources. The following at the CSU Global Writing Center should help you assess what a credible source will resemble: Types of Sources Links to an external site.. Your paper must be formatted according to CSU Global Writing Center Links to an external site.. You may use the template paper for this assignment. APA Template Paper
Answer Below:
Scientific grant application writing: Re/packaging text to enhance its impact Michael Cuthbertson Colorado State University- Global Composition II (GT-CO2)- ENG102 Instructor- Barbara CiccarelliDecember 23rd, 2022 Scientific grant application writing: Re/packaging text to enhance its impact The article "Scientific Grant Application Writing: Re/Packaging Text to Enhance Its Impact" was published in the Journal of English for Academic Purposes in 2020. The authors of the article are Stenglin and Cl?irigh. The essay's central thesis is that how scientific grant application texts are packaged and presented can significantly impact their chances of being funded. The authors argue that the language and structure used in grant applications are crucial in conveying the significance and potential impact of the proposed research and that reworking and repackaging text can help enhance the grant application's overall effect. The authors present research on the linguistic and rhetorical features of successful grant applications and offer practical advice for researchers on how to craft influential grant application texts. They also discuss the challenges and limitations of grant application writing and the importance of considering the needs and expectations of the funding agency when preparing a grant proposal. The authors present research on how the language and structure of grant application texts can impact their chances of being funded. The authors argue that reworking and repackaging text can enhance grant applications' overall impact and effectiveness. To support their thesis, the authors present a detailed analysis of the linguistic and rhetorical features of successful grant applications, including persuasive language and the importance of aligning the proposed research with the goals and priorities of the funding agency. They also offer practical advice for researchers on crafting influential grant application texts and highlight the challenges and limitations of grant application writing. The article provides valuable insights and guidance for researchers seeking funding for their projects. It emphasizes the importance of carefully considering the language and structure of grant application texts to effectively convey the significance and potential impact of the proposed research. In addition to their analysis of successful grant applications, the authors offer practical advice for researchers on crafting influential grant application texts. They suggest that researchers carefully consider the language and structure of their grant applications and aim to clearly and concisely convey their proposed research's significance and potential impact. They also recommend that researchers consider the needs and expectations of the funding agency when preparing a grant proposal and tailor their application accordingly. Explore how the language and structure of grant application texts can impact their chances of being funded. The authors argue that how scientific grant application texts are packaged and presented can significantly impact their chances of being supported and that reworking and repackaging text can help enhance the overall effect of the grant application. The article provides valuable insights and guidance for researchers seeking funding for their projects. It emphasizes the importance of carefully considering the language and structure of grant application texts to effectively convey the significance and potential impact of the proposed research. It offers practical advice for researchers on how to craft influential grant application texts. I agree with the idea presented by Stenglin and Cl?irigh in the article "Scientific Grant Application Writing: Re/Packaging Text to Enhance Its Impact" that the language and structure of grant application texts can have a significant impact on their chances of being funded. The authors present convincing evidence of the importance of persuasive language and rhetorical devices in conveying the proposed research's significance and potential impact. I believe these strategies can effectively persuade reviewers to fund a project. One point where I disagree with the authors is their suggestion that researchers should tailor their grant applications to the needs and expectations of the funding agency. While I agree that it is crucial to consider the goals and priorities of the funding agency, researchers should also be true to their research interests and goals. If a researcher is not genuinely interested in the research they are proposing; it is unlikely to be of high quality or make a significant impact. Another point where I agree with the authors is their emphasis on the importance of clearly and concisely conveying the significance and potential impact of the proposed research. As the authors note, grant reviewers often need more time. They are evaluating many applications, so it is essential that researchers effectively communicate the value and potential impact of their proposed research concisely and compellingly. It is crucial for early career researchers, who may not have a track record of publication or funding, to demonstrate the significance of their work. This article provides valuable insights and guidance for researchers seeking funding for their projects. While I agree with many of the points made by the authors, researchers need to stay true to their research interests and goals while also considering the needs and expectations of the funding agency. The authors present a detailed analysis of successful grant applications' linguistic and rhetorical features and offer practical advice for researchers on how to craft influential grant application texts. Moreover, one of the main implications of the article is the importance of carefully considering the language and structure of grant application texts to effectively convey the significance and potential impact of the proposed research. The authors argue that persuasive language and rhetorical devices can effectively persuade reviewers to fund a project, and they provide examples of the types of language and structure commonly used in successful grant applications. One gap in the research is the lack of attention to different funding agencies' specific requirements and expectations. While the authors discuss the importance of aligning the proposed research with the goals and priorities of the funding agency, they need to provide more detail on the specific requirements and expectations of different agencies. It would be helpful to have more information on how to tailor grant applications to the particular needs and expectations of various funding agencies. However, there are still some areas where further research and information would be helpful, such as the specific requirements and expectations of different funding agencies. References Stenglin, M., & Cl?irigh, C. (2020). Scientific grant application writing: Re/packaging text to enhance its impact. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100823.More Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
