Question.3660 - Purpose—Why do this? This writing assignment asks you to apply what we are learning about rhetorical analysis to Vershawn Ashanti Young's text "Should Writers Use They Own English?" You will practice noticing and analyzing (looking closely at) rhetorical strategies that Ashanti Young uses, and you will practice summarizing and writing about your analysis. This assignment is designed to help you reach the learning goals for this unit: Choose and apply effective reading strategies for deep comprehension of academic texts Analyze and explain the rhetorical structures of academic texts Attribute the ideas of others to avoid plagiarism This assignment will also help you prepare for our first major assignment: Mini Argument Synthesis Instructions—How Should I Do this? You will complete four separate pieces of writing--this is NOT an essay assignment: A 150-200 word summary of the text A paragraph analyzing how Ashanti Young uses ethos to convince his audience that his thesis is true. Use specific examples and quotes to illustrate. Make sure to explain and cite appropriately. A paragraph analyzing how Ashanti Young uses logos to convince his audience that his thesis is true. Use specific examples and quotes to illustrate. Make sure to explain and cite appropriately. A paragraph analyzing how Ashanti Young uses pathos to convince his audience that his thesis is true. Use specific examples and quotes to illustrate. Make sure to explain and cite appropriately.
Answer Below:
Top of Form Bottom of Form Writing Assignment 4 Summary of "Should Writers Use Their Own English?" In "Should Writers Use They Own English?", Vershawn Ashanti Young argues for the acceptance of diverse dialects, specifically African American Vernacular English (AAVE), in writing. The dominance of Standard American English (SAE) is criticized because it is the main acceptable form in academic and professional contexts, asserting that this exclusivity undermines the identities and voices of writers from different backgrounds. He further emphasizes that language is deeply intertwined with cultural identity, and authentic expressions can be silenced by enforcing SAE. Code meshing is a practice where writers blend various dialects; Young further advocates for code-meshing for richer communication and representation. Young calls for a broader understanding of effective communication by challenging the power dynamics associated with language use, which values all forms of English. Readers find his work encouraging and encouraging them to recognize the importance of linguistic diversity. It further influences them to embrace a more inclusive approach to writing. Ethos Analysis Young establishes his credibility by sharing his personal experiences as a Black writer in predominantly white academic spaces. He recounts instances where his use of AAVE was met with scepticism, illustrating the challenges faced by those who deviate from SAE. This narrative not only humanizes his argument but also positions him as an authority on the subject. Additionally, Young's academic background in linguistics enhances his ethos; he references scholarly studies to support his claims about language diversity. For instance, he discusses how linguistic discrimination affects students' performance and self-esteem, demonstrating a thorough understanding of the topic. By combining personal anecdotes with academic references, Young effectively builds trust with his audience, encouraging them to engage with his argument. Logos Analysis Young employs logical reasoning by presenting evidence that supports his advocacy for code-meshing. He cites research indicating that students who are allowed to use their home dialects often perform better academically than those restricted to SAE. This data strengthens his argument by providing concrete support for his claims about the benefits of linguistic diversity. Furthermore, Young addresses counterarguments regarding AAVEs perceived inferiority when he debunked myths about its grammatical structure. Young constructs a compelling case for embracing diverse dialects by systematically dismantling these misconceptions and presenting well-researched evidence in academic writing. Pathos Analysis Young effectively appeals to emotion through relatable storytelling and vivid examples. He shares narratives of individuals marginalized due to their linguistic choices, evoking empathy from readers. For instance, he describes a student whose voice was stifled because teachers deemed their dialect unacceptable. This emotional connection compels readers to consider the broader implications of language discrimination on identity and self-worth. Incorporating humour and relatable anecdotes, Young's writing style engages readers very easily, making complex ideas accessible and relatable. By tapping into the audience's emotions, he underscores the importance of valuing linguistic diversity as a means of fostering inclusivity in communication.More Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
