Question.824 - Research Proposal and Preliminary Bibliography In Module 2, you began conducting research for your final paper examining one of the themes noted in the course. For this Critical Thinking Assignment, provide a short research proposal and cite seven (7) or more credible sources in an annotated bibliography. You may use the sources you worked on for this week’s discussion. This critical thinking assignment has two parts: Part 1: Research Proposal Address the following in your proposal: What topic/question do you plan to research? Why? What sparks your interest in this issue? And why does this issue matter to others beyond yourself? Who are the various stakeholders when it comes to this issue? Then, who is your intended audience? What specific group of individuals has the power to make a change when it comes to this issue? How have you narrowed this topic/question to make it more manageable? How could you keep narrowing it if needed? What makes your topic/question debatable? What are 3-5 open-ended questions within this topic? Based on your preliminary bibliography, how researchable does this question seem? Have you found a wealth of diverse sources and opinions? How credible and reliable do your sources seem? How easy or difficult was it to find peer-reviewed/scholarly sources? Which sources are most promising? Why? NOTE: This assignment is not a full research essay. For now, you are writing a few paragraphs defending your research topic, why it matters, what its central questions are, etc. Your research proposal must be approved by your instructor to move forward with your research. Part 2: Annotated Bibliography Address the following for the annotated bibliography: APA formatting for the citations Citations/sources listed in alphabetical order Note how each source will help you explore your topic more fully. All sources should be print books, eBooks from the library, articles from the library databases, or articles (print or web) from local, regional, and national/international newspapers and magazines. No general websites, .com websites, wiki sites, personal blogs, etc. At least 2 of your sources need to be peer-reviewed/scholarly journal articles from the library
Answer Below:
Science Writing and the Public (Secular Science) Michael Cuthbertson Colorado State University- Global Composition II (GT-CO2) - ENG102 Instructor- Barbara Ciccarelli January 3rd, 2023 Part 1 Research Paper Proposal Abstract Science writing is not about writing regarding science instead, it is the technical writing which scientists do to communicate their research to others. Hence, general science writing to the public means that it is part of science communication and is also part of efforts to share scientific topics with non-scientists. Science writing refers to the art of writings on complex subjects that drive information and can communicate with the general public in an understandable way (Colorado State University Global Library, 2022). The concerning aspect in secular science writings, the relationship between religion and science, is an exciting factor in choosing the topic. Keywords Science writing, public Science Writing and the Public (Secular Science) The fact is that not all secular science textbooks are made based on equality, and some of them are quite vocal regarding the promotion of anti-faith approaches (Shaposhnikova et al., 2021). Due to this, some Christian educators, as well as parents, are expressing their concerns. While they are encountering the prospect of utilizing secular science books to the public for the science course, they are worried. They worry as this atheistic bias presented in the textbooks could harm their children and the students whose worldview is continually developing upon the basis of Christianity. Stakeholders The stakeholders are the scientists themselves, publishers of scientific journals, and government agencies. The intended audiences are the public, and they can change the situation. Narrowing of the Topic The topic could narrow to occupation, age group, ethnic group, gender, etc., and this could continue. Open-Ended Questions The challenges of secular writings make the topic debatable. The three open-ended questions are What are the intersecting things you have read in the science field What are the biggest unanswered questions in science Do you ever find it questioning what scientists know regarding the natural world Diverse Sources and Opinions Sources providing precise reasons behind the issues of religious bias in science writings are deemed reliable and creditable. The peer-based sources search is relatively simple and more promising as, in this approach, scholarship writings from the expert of a specific discipline could receive. References Colorado State University Global Library (2022). LibGuides ENG102 Library Course Guide Science Writing and the Public (Secular Science). Retrieved 26 December 2022, from HYPERLINK https//csuglobal.libguides.com/eng102/science https//csuglobal.libguides.com/eng102/science. Shaposhnikova, T., Kostyukova, T., Zianshina, R., Gorbacheva, T. (2021). The Textbooks as instrument for managing the interaction of secular and religious education.ARPHA Proceedings,4, 812-819. Table 1 Clarkson and Associates Income Statement Year Ending December 31, 2012 Note. Adapted fromModule 4 Introduction to Team Building, by Colorado State University Global, 2020, Canvas (https//portal.csuglobal.edu). Copyright 2020 by Colorado State University Global. Table 2 The Four Principles of Sustainability Performance Note. Adapted from Improving sustainability performance Specifying, implements and measuring key principles by M. Epstein M. Roy, 2003,Journal of General Management, 29(1), pp.15-31. Copyright 2020 by SAGE. Part 2 Annotated Bibliography Barel-Ben David, Y., Garty, E., Baram-Tsabari, A. (2020). Can scientists fill the science journalism void Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists.PLOS ONE,15(1), 1-15. HYPERLINK https//doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250 https//doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222250. Getting the same level of public engagement that the sites reporters obtained is not a desirable outcome for scientists who write about science for the wider public. However, this perspective makes various assumptions regarding the quality of science writing and the significant factors determining whether the general public would enjoy and appreciate popular science writing on general interest news websites. The audience is more engaged with the science writers, even though it is reasonable to believe that contents produced by scientists have a higher density of scientific material and are more accurate than the science writers. Bauer, M. W., Falade, B. A. (2021). Public understanding of science Survey research around the world. InRoutledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology(pp. 238-266). Routledge. HYPERLINK https//doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287 https//doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287. Public interest, attitudes, .and knowledge toward science can see in the context of the public understanding of science (PUS) movement, its goals, repertoire, resources, and actors. From the middle of the 1980s onward, the PUS became a slogan for several individuals, a symbol for gathering and producing better work. Traditionally, visible scientists speaking with a larger audience might find among the actors. However, science writers also work for publications, including newspapers, radio, television, magazines, and best-selling books. The staff members at science museums and more current science centers are another science writing group. Gere, A. R., Limlamai, N., Wilson, E., MacDougall Saylor, K., Pugh, R. (2019). Writing and conceptual learning in science An analysis of assignments.Written Communication,36(1), 99-135. HYPERLINK https//doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804820 https//doi.org/10.1177/0741088318804820. Scientists have recognized criticism, reasoned argument, problem-solving, and knowledge application as characteristics that enhance writing for learning in science. Science educators suggested a framework consisting of the topic (the idea to be solved), purpose, type (genre), the audience for use, and mode of text production (usage of technology for text) to structure writing-to-learn projects. Other research using this framework and emphasizing the audience showed that science writing for the public, excluding the trainer, leads to what is known as transformative writing, which further results in conceptual knowledge. Karraker, N., McWilliams, S. R., Scott, A., MortonAiken, J., Reynolds, N., Finan, E., Lofgren, I. E. (2022). A low-investment, high-impact approach for training stronger and more confident graduate student science writers. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(1), 1-7. HYPERLINK https//doi.org/10.1111/csp2.573 https//doi.org/10.1111/csp2.573. Even the most experienced science writers find it difficult and have an increasing concern to effectively communicate science to peers and audiences who are not specialists. Unarticulated standards of both disciplinary scientific and public science writing provide significant barriers to professionalization and degree completion for the learner scientist, partly due to their differences. Developers have developed an interdisciplinary program that includes writing-intensive pedagogy and rhetorical theory to instruct graduate science students in excellent science writing for the public. Landis, B., Bajak, A., de la Hoz, J., Gonzlez, J., Gose, R., Tibbs, C., Oskin, B. (2020). CmoSciWri Resources to Help Science Writers Engage Bicultural and Bilingual Audiences in the United States.Frontiers in Communication,5. HYPERLINK https//doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00010 https//doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.00010. American science writers, especially journalists and public information officers (PIOs), are responsible for explaining science to the countrys growing number of bilingual and multilingual citizens. From institutional content to journalistic stories, science writing in the U.S. frequently uses examples, narratives, and references that appeal most to the white American public. Although they concentrate on the Latinx experience in the United States, these best practices can be broadly applied to science writing for communities and identities based on any U.S. cultural group. McGellin, R. T. L., Grand, A., Sullivan, M. (2021). Stop avoiding the inevitable The effects of anthropomorphism in science writing for non-experts.Public Understanding of Science,30(5), 621-640. HYPERLINK https//doi.org/10.1177/09636625219917 https//doi.org/10.1177/09636625219917. It is not easy to write about science for a non-specialist audience thus, science writers should make every effort to make their writing as focused, clear, engaging, and cohesive as possible. There is no reason why those tools should not incorporate anthropomorphism for the capable adult public with the appropriate subject matter. Science writers will need conclusive information regarding the effects to make an informed judgment about how and when to utilize anthropomorphism in their writing for the adult public. Prayag, A. (2019). Overview and principles of scientific writing.Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology,40(03), 420-423. HYPERLINK https//doi.org/10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_131_19 https//doi.org/10.4103/ijmpo.ijmpo_131_19. The most vital method of distributing scientific works is science writing which assists in documenting and communicating concepts, outcomes, and activities to others. Scientific writing can find in various forms, such as laboratory notebooks, articles in scientific magazines or academic journals, or project reports. Good writing can help scientists in different ways, improving teamwork and making it easier to acquire cross-disciplinary knowledge. Additionally, it would improve communication with the general public, which funds research programs as well as with other researchers. PAGE MERGEFORMAT 6 PAGE 1More Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
