Question.3846 - This is an opportunity to revise Writing assignment 4--based on my feedback. You must have completed writing assignment 4 by the grace period to be eligible to complete this revision. Please use the feedback I gave you in Writing Assignment 4 to help you revise. Then upload your revision here. This writing assignment asks you to apply what we are learning about rhetorical analysis to Vershawn Ashanti Young's text "Should Writers Use They Own English?" You will practice noticing and analyzing (looking closely at) rhetorical strategies that Ashanti Young uses, and you will practice summarizing and writing about your analysis. This assignment is designed to help you reach the learning goals for this unit: Choose and apply effective reading strategies for deep comprehension of academic texts Analyze and explain the rhetorical structures of academic texts Attribute the ideas of others to avoid plagiarism This assignment will also help you prepare for our first major assignment: Mini Argument Synthesis Instructions—How Should I Do this? You will complete four separate pieces of writing--this is NOT an essay assignment: A 150-200 word summary of the text A paragraph analyzing how Ashanti Young uses ethos to convince his audience that his thesis is true. Use specific examples and quotes to illustrate. Make sure to explain and cite appropriately. A paragraph analyzing how Ashanti Young uses logos to convince his audience that his thesis is true. Use specific examples and quotes to illustrate. Make sure to explain and cite appropriately. A paragraph analyzing how Ashanti Young uses pathos to convince his audience that his thesis is true. Use specific examples and quotes to illustrate. Make sure to explain and cite appropriately.
Answer Below:
In Vershawn Ashanti Youngs essay Should Writers Use They Own English? Young uses ethos, logos, and pathos to persuasion in order to argue for embracing other linguistic varieties in academic writing, especially AAVE. Young also confronts SAE as a suppressor of writers from different backgrounds since it dominates the writing industry. Young also builds up his authority to write about racism, anti-Blackness, and Black identity with experiences as a Black writer in predominantly White environments. As a black man, he was told such language was wrong whenever he used AAVE; he was treated this way because he wasnt white. Besides qualifying, this narrative also domesticates his argument and situates him as the expert on the issue at hand. His ethos is also boosted by academic knowledge in Linguistics; he substantiated his points by referencing sources stating that Linguistic discrimination impacts on students performance and self-esteem. Speaking of reasoning, Young gives evidence and arguments concerning code-meshing or the integration of different dialects in writing. He says, students who are permitted to use home varieties fare well in their academic endeavors than the ones prohibited to do so or limited to SAE only. This data affirms his arguments about the need to have linguistic diversity for the benefits to be realized. Besides, to object to misconceptions associated with grammatical usages of AAVE he stated that There is no inferior dialect. This way, he effectively erases prejudice that helps to continue discrimination based on language. The use of emotion is even more powerful when Young proceeds to tell a normal-sounding real-life story. He brings out an example of a learner who was silenced because his/her accent was considered appropriate, and the student finished by saying, They thought they were losing their personality. This elicits relatability and engages the audience into thinking and coming up with rationality of prejudice of language in demeaning ones worth. His humorous disposition and the way he presents his ideas in a scenario format are very appealing to readers, bearing in mind that he simplifies issues. Therefore, Youngs essay is a good appeal to accept the use of writing in other languages as a good practice and a possibility of expanding the number of languages used more widely. He writes in personal tone in order to make the audience to be more understanding about the significance of accepting all aspects of English. In addition to perplexing hegemonic relations concerning the management of language, his work promotes better language access in academic settings.More Articles From English
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
