Question.4373 - Team Assignment: Lost At Sea New AttemptDue Jun 6 by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a file uploadAssignment AI Policy Select for Details ¢ – ¼OverviewEach team should create a document in which they:Report the 3 scores discussed on the lesson page:group accuracy,average individual accuracy, andbest individual accuracy.(Your entire spreadsheet is unnecessary. Simply the three numbers, labelled of course.)Also (as a team), briefly write about:If your team were faced with a somewhat parallel type of decision scenario in the future, is there anything relative to your group decision process or consensus building process that you would change or modify the next time around?How might all of this relate to the assigned article (Kahneman, Lovallo, and Sibony, "Before You Make That Big Decision¢ € )?(About 300 words total for parts a and b combined. put total #words at end)Team discussions are not monitored by Instructor. Teams may communicate through any medium they choose. For Virtual Team-building, Lost at Sea, and Carter Racing your team must have synchronous meetings.& For Team Decisions and Fights such a meeting might help but is not necessary.SubmissionUpload this document here so that it can be graded. Also, post this in the Lesson 3 Discussion: Lost at Sea. (and when you post it please remember to indicate what team number the post represents)PreviousNext
Answer Below:
MBADM xxxxxxxx Leading xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Assignment xxxx at xxxxxx Pennsylvania xxxxx UniversityJune xxxx SixIIIIIHHHHHNNNNNJJJJJJJMMMMRRRRRRRAverage xxxxxxxxxx Accuracy xxxxx Group xxxxxxxx Score xxxx Individual xxxxxxxx Score xx our xxxx were xx face x similar xxxxxxxx in xxx future xx would xxxxxx that xxx team xxxxxxx were xxxx to xxxxxx the xxxxxxx team xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx meeting xx met xx two xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx team xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx and xxxx we xxxxx was xxxx individuals xxxx different xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx their xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Because xxxxx team xxxxxxx were xxxx to xxxxx knowledge xx logical xxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxx rankings xxxxx team xxxxxxx saw xxxxx in xxx justifications xxxxxxxx resulting xx the xxxxxx decision xx reevaluate xxx team's xxxxxxx from xxx first xxxxxxx The xxxxxx decision-making xxxxxxx focused xxxxxxx on xxx prioritization xx water xxxx and xxxxxx aids xxxx other xxxxxxxxxxx items xxxxx deprioritized xxxx resulted xx a xxxx ranking xxxxxx to xxxx of xxx expert xxxxxxxx The xxxxxx openness xx hear xxx respectfully xxxxxxxx each xxxxxxxx point xx view xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx decision-making xxxxxxxxxx even xxxxx those xxxx members xxx already xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxx Kahneman xxxxxxx and xxxxxx introduce x checklist xxxx supports xxxxxxxx quality xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx decision xxxxxx and xxxxx for xxxx The xxxxxxxxx includes xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxxxxx should xxx themselves xxx team xxxxxxx making xxx recommendations xxxxxxxx et xx Items xxxxx in xxxx checklist xxxx on xxxxxxxxxx information xxx historical xxxx which xxx team xxx not xxxx After xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx justifications xx made xxxxx but xx the xxxx decision-making xxxxxxx since xxxxxxxx was xxx allowed xx relied xxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxx information xxxx each xxxx member xxxxxx it xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxx confident xx rankings xx conclusion xx may xxx have xxxx able xx check xxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxx bias xxxxxxxxx bias xx the xxxxxxxxx effect xxx we xxxx able xx grasp xxxxx available xx us xxx questions xx those xxxxxx recommendations xx check xxxxxxxxx knowledge xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx use xxxx person's xxx knowledge xx support xx oppose xxxxxxxxx recommendation xxxxxxxx et xx Word xxxxx References xxxxxxxx D xxxxxxx D xxxxxx O xxx big xxxx before xxx make xxxx big xxxxxxxx Harvard xxxxxxxx Review xxxxx hbr xxx the-big-idea-before-you-make-that-big-decisionMore Articles From Leadership Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
