Question.3525 - Please obtain instructor approval in the week 2 discussion prior to submitting your working title assignment here to be graded. Please as discussed in the week 2 discussion and week 2 lesson make the 'working title' straight forward so that it is not only easy to read, but easy to interpret as well. Be brief and avoid using unnecessary words. Use a single title or a double title. An example of a double title is, Network Theory: Prison Gangs in Kentucky an Inmate's Perception. Here, we know the proposal (study) is about Network theory, as it relates to an inmate's perception of prison gangs in Kentucky. As a rule of thumb, make the title no longer than 12 words. A good way to do this is to remove articles and prepositions, but make sure the working title includes the focus i.e., topic of the study. Please remember you are selecting a topic NOT for writing a research paper about, but rather for writing a proposal to do actual hands-on research using scientific research methodology. (However, NO actual hands-on research will be conducted in this class based on your proposal.) Submit your proposed working title for approval by no later than Sunday of week 2. Late submissions of this assignment will not be accepted. Your response should reflect upper-level undergraduate writing and current APA standards.
Answer Below:
Abstract In order to better understand how digital technology affects health professionals' everyday operations, decision-making processes, and mental well-being, this research examines the lived experiences of medical professionals during global health emergencies. Knowing how digital tools affect front-line healthcare professionals is critical since they have become essential in controlling global health crises like the COVID-19 epidemic. The study uses a phenomenological method to investigate how medical personnel view and utilize digital tools in times of crisis. This study attempts to determine the advantages, difficulties, and psychological impacts of integrating digital technology in emergency healthcare through semi-structured interviews and focus groups with medical experts and IT specialists. Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has brought attention to how important digital technology is for responding to situations involving the world's health. These tools are now essential to contemporary healthcare systems, helping with anything from improving communication tactics to collecting data in real time. Despite the growing dependence on digital technologies, little is known about the real-world experiences that healthcare workers have when adjusting to these instruments during emergencies. This study intends to urgently investigate how these professionals view and use digital technology in times of global health crisis, emphasizing how it affects their day-to-day functioning, decision-making ability, and emotional well-being. Aims and Objectives Investigating the varying perspectives of medical personnel utilizing digital tools during international health emergencies. Recognizing the advantages and difficulties that front-line employees perceive with digital technology. Analyzing the effects of digital tools on teamwork and decision-making under demanding situations. Determining the impact of digital technology on one's emotional and mental health in times of crisis. Research Questions How do health professionals experience and perceive the use of digital technology in managing global health emergencies? What are the lived experiences of health professionals regarding integrating digital technologies into their response strategies during pandemics? What challenges and benefits do health professionals encounter when using digital tools during global health emergencies? Literatures Review The literature review section analyses how technology helped professionals manage global healthcare emergencies. Previous Literature The research indicates that digital technology is increasingly important in global health emergencies. Research such as Kringos et al. (2020) emphasises the use of performance intelligence and real-time data in enhancing the responsiveness of health systems. Burkle (2020) points out the legal and political barriers that can prevent digital integration from working effectively, especially in autocratic countries where it is possible to hide or falsify health data. Research on the lived experiences of health workers interacting with these tools during global health emergencies is scarce despite technological advancements and macro-level studies. Literature Gap The effectiveness of digital technology in managing global health has been extensively studied, but more is needed about the varying perspectives of medical professionals who use these tools. Few people know how digital technologies affect people's decision-making ability, work with others, or maintain emotional stability. By investigating the first-hand accounts of medical experts during a global health emergency, this study aims to close that gap. Methodology Participants' rich, descriptive data will be gathered using a qualitative research methodology. Research suggests that technology in the healthcare industry is constantly changing because of the speed at which software and operating systems are developing and the advancement of professional competencies (do Nascimento et al., 2023). Rather than measuring the impact of digital technologies, the emphasis will be on comprehending the varying subjective experiences of health professionals. Research Design The study will employ a phenomenological design to investigate the participants' lived experiences. Events such as the COVID-19 pandemic profoundly affect our communities, institutions, and people and drastically change how the public uses and relies on digital technology (Gkeredakis et al. 2020). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups will be held to gather in-depth descriptions of how digital technology affected their work amid global health emergencies. Data Collection Method Interviews: Semi-structured talks with medical experts who have responded to international health emergencies (like COVID-19). During these interviews, participants will be able to talk about their experiences using digital technology at work. Focus Groups: Focus groups are required to be conducted with crisis management specialists and health professionals to examine shared experiences and identify common problems and benefits of digital technologies. Data Analysis and Findings Thematic analysis will examine the data to find patterns and recurring themes in the participants' experiences. By putting aside the researcher's prejudices, bracketing will ensure a genuine comprehension of the participants' lived experiences. The research looks at common themes, including decision-making speed, the emotional toll of relying on digital technology, and the effectiveness of teamwork. Conclusion The study will advance our knowledge of how digital technology affects healthcare workers' day-to-day experiences during international health emergencies. It will shed light on the advantages and difficulties they encounter and make suggestions for enhancing the incorporation of digital tools into crisis management. Limitations of the research The main research constraint is the use of self-reported data, which is prone to bias and memory recall problems. The availability of participants with firsthand experience of digital technology during a global health emergency may also limit the research. Future Scope Subsequent investigations may examine the enduring effects of digital technology on the job methodologies and emotional fortitude of healthcare practitioners. Studies could potentially compare health professionals' experiences in other nations to comprehend how regional elements, such as political systems or healthcare infrastructure, influence the efficiency of digital technology in global health emergencies. Recommendations Better Training: Provide medical personnel with thorough instruction on using digital technologies to optimize emergency productivity. Policy Enhancement: Draft regulations that facilitate the easy assimilation of digital technology into healthcare systems, especially in environments with constrained resources. Careful planning and execution of digital governance are necessary to enable crisis coordination and communication (Hu & Liu, 2022). Technological Adaptation: To lower stress and enhance decision-making, create intuitive digital tools suited to the unique requirements of front-line healthcare providers. References Burkle, F. M. (2020). Digital health and political barriers: An analysis of global health responses. Global Health Watch, 15(1), 115-122. do Nascimento, I. J. B., Abdulazeem, H. M., Vasanthan, L. T., Martinez, E. Z., Zucoloto, M. L., Østengaard, L., ... & Novillo-Ortiz, D. (2023). The global effect of digital health technologies on health workers’ competencies and health workplace: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and lexical-based and sentence-based meta-analysis. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(8), e534-e544. Gkeredakis, M., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., & Barrett, M. (2021). Crisis as opportunity, disruption and exposure: Exploring emergent responses to crisis through digital technology. Information and Organization, 31(1), 100344. Hu, Q., & Liu, Y. (2022). Crisis management and national responses to COVID-19: Global perspectives. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(4), 737-750. Kringos, D. S., et al. (2020). Real-time data and performance intelligence in global health responses. Journal of Health Systems, 12(3), 233-245.More Articles From Research
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
