TeamsDiscussionHenry Tam and the MGI TeamDiscussion InstructionsInstructions Mountain Standard or Mountain Daylight Time post one 5426

MGMT 6100 Managing People and Organizations

Question.5426 - TeamsDiscussionHenry Tam and the MGI TeamDiscussion InstructionsInstructions (Mountain Standard or Mountain Daylight Time), post one substantial, well-constructed contribution. The post should clearly state your position, include supporting evidence from the case study, and appropriately apply concepts from the reading assignments.This initial post should be between 250 and 300 words in length. (Mountain Standard or Mountain Daylight Time), make at least three meaningful replies (not to exceed 150 words each) to other studentsâ initial posts and/or responses to your initial post. Replies should be thoughtful and push the conversation forward, not simply agree, disagree or restate the post. Add your own thoughts and build upon what your classmates have posted. (This often is more difficult than it initially appears and requires some meaningful thought and effort. One way you can add to the conversation is by offering a different perspective or by contrasting your classmate's post with the application of a different principle. Another way to push the conversation forward is by adding a new and different example of how to apply the principle your classmate mentions. A third way of building upon your classmates' posts is by asking a related, rhetorical question and then providing your thoughts to answer the question. Each of these examples keep the conversation going and help to provide greater insight into how to apply the principles from the module.)Continue to monitor the discussion board throughout the week and engage with students who comment on your posts.Indicate the posts that you feel best address the question by liking them.Contribute to the learning community by positively engaging and challenging each other.Please include the word count as part of your submission on all assignments, including posts and replies.Use proper grammar, spelling and punctuation. Always be professional.Grading of AssessmentGrading will be based upon the attached rubric. (Click on the link with the three dots at the top right of the page to show the rubric.)Your initial post will be worth a maximum of 20 points, your responses and engagement with other students' posts will be worth a maximum of 18 points, and 2 points will be awarded for grammar and including the word count, for a total maximum of 40 points for this assignment.Since active participation is critical to this online discussion, no credit will be given for late submissions.Background âIn addition to finding the right size, teams must develop the right mix of skills; that is, each of the complementary skills necessary to do the teamâs job. As obvious as it sounds, it is a common failing in potential teams.âKatzenbach, Jon R. and Douglas K. Smith. "The Discipline of Teams. (Cover Story)." Harvard Business Review, vol. 83, no. 7/8, Jul/Aug2005, pp. 162-171 âCEOs who go to great lengths to avoid conflict often do so believing that they are strengthening their teams by avoiding destructive disagreement. This is ironic, because what they are really doing is stifling productive conflict and pushing important issues that need to be resolved under the carpet where they will fester. Eventually, those unresolved issues transform into uglier and more personal discord when executives grow frustrated at what they perceive to be repeated problems. What CEOs and their teams must do is learn to identify artificial harmony when they see it, and incite productive conflict in its place. This is a messy process, one that takes time to master. But there is no avoiding it, because to do so makes it next to impossible for a team to make real commitment.âLencioni, Patrick M. "The Trouble with Teamwork." Leader to Leader, vol. 2003, no. 29, Summer2003, pp. 35-40 Assignment Very briefly share how you would have evaluated the team âon paper,â that is, before their first meeting? Should the diversity among the team members have been a strength or a weakness? (No more than one or two sentences.)Which one to two (1-2) principle(s) from this module should Henry Tam have applied during the team's development to have achieved a more effective, high functioning team? Provide examples of how Tam might have applied this principle(s).

Answer Below:

On xxxxx before xxx first xxxxxxx the xxx team xxx highly xxxxxxx in xxxxx of xxxxx experience xxx cultural xxxxxxxxxx factors xxxx should xxxx represented xxx strengths xx the xxxx that xxx be xxxxxxxxx But xxxxxxxxx roles xxxxxxxx communication xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx perspectives xx the xxxxxxxx strategy xxxxxxxxx possible xxxxxxxxx that xxxxx get xx the xxx of xxxx team xxxxxxxxxxx In xxxxx to xxxxxx more xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx Henry xxx should xxxx applied xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxxx Emotional xxxxxxxxxxxx framework xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx represents xxx ability xx control xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx poise xxxxx intense xxxxxxxx Ongoing xxxxxxxx particularly xxxxxxx Sasha xxx Dana xxxxxxx to xxxxx down xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx decisions xxxxxxxxxxxx Tam xxx implement xxxx ground xxxxx on xxxxxxxxxxx so xxxxxxx are xxx personal xx could xxxx for xxxxxxxx encouraged xxxxxx listening xxxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx toward xxxxxxx solutions xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx on xxx was xxxxx This xxxxx be xxxxxxxx up xxxx team xxxxxx and xxx allowing xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx improvement xxxxxxxxxxx Social xxxxx would xx helpful xx make xxx team xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx the xxx between xxxxxxx personalities xxxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx diversity xx the xxxx members xxx could xxxx encouraged xxxx discussions xxxxx expectations xxx ways xx working xxxxx from xxx beginning xx could xxxx reduced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx relationships xx structuring xxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx assigning xxxxx to xxxxxx with xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx sure xxxxxxxx participated xxx instance xx could xxxx prevented xxxxxxxxxxxx brainstorming xxxx dominating xxx meetings xxx channelled xxxxxxxxxxx towards xxxxxxxxxx decisions xxxxxxxx communication xxx trust xxxxx team xxxxxxx would xxxx resulted xx better xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx chances xx successfully xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx plan xxxxxxxxx these xxxxxxxxxx could xxxx made xxx turn xxx diversity xx the xxxx into x major xxxxxxxx or xx asset xxxxxx than xxxxxxxxxxx