Question.3794 - Introduction/Goals and Objectives Section This week you will be writing the first portion of the program evaluation report, the introduction. It will be helpful to skip ahead to chapter 9 in the textbook, starting with page 220. Begin with a brief introduction to the agency. Include the name, location, types of services provided, and age range of the clients served. Then, for the program, include the following sections. It will be helpful to use headings in your report. Include the name of the program in headings and in the text. Section 1 (The Problem): Using peer-reviewed sources, explain the severity of the mental health disorder treated. Often, providing statistical evidence regarding the number of individuals affected or examples of the cost to society (for example, homelessness, joblessness, educational impact) can be a very effective supplement to the information reported in peer-reviewed sources. It is acceptable to use reputable survey result sources, such as government reports, for some of the statistical evidence. Section 2 (The Program): Using your Week 2 assignment, provide evidence of the effectiveness of the treatment used in your program. Section 3 (The Evaluation): In this section, incorporate the goals and objectives that you discussed in the discussion this week.
Answer Below:
The Older Adult Depression Program, a pivotal initiative of the Welcome Behavioral Health Agency (WBHA), is committed to enhancing general functioning and alleviating depression symptoms in individuals aged 65 and above. Through the use of group interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT), the program targets major causes of depression, including role shifts, social isolation, and interpersonal issues. Its primary objectives are to improve mental health outcomes and promote increased participation in daily activities and social interactions, underscoring the crucial role it plays in the lives of older adults. How does participation in the Older Adult Depression Program, which uses IPT in a group setting, significantly reduce depressive symptoms and improve overall functionality in people 65 and older, as measured by pre-and post-intervention scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)? That is the assessment question that guides this evaluation. A significant reduction in depressive symptoms, with a clinically meaningful drop of five or more points on the GDS from pre- to post-intervention, will be used to demonstrate the program's efficacy. A significant reduction in symptoms must be demonstrated by 60% of participants on average for the program to succeed. Furthermore, enhancements in the general functionality of the participants, such as heightened social interaction and involvement in everyday tasks, will be seen as supportive markers of achievement. These ancillary goals will highlight the program's broader effects on older individuals' quality of life. Self-reported well-being and participant comments will provide further information about how effectively the program achieves its objectives. Several factors will be measured to collect the required proof. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) will be used to measure changes in depression symptoms both before and after the intervention. Participants' age, gender, marital status, race, and educational attainment will also be noted to detect any moderating factors that may impact the results. Program engagement indicators like attendance and group session participation will also be monitored to gauge how healthy participants interact with the intervention. These facts will contribute to a better comprehension of the program's effectiveness. Finally, the Older Adult Depression Program will undergo a comprehensive and meticulous evaluation. Validated tools that measure daily living activities and social engagement levels will be employed to track participant functionality and social interaction improvements. Surveys will be distributed to participants to gather their feedback on the program's effectiveness and satisfaction. This combination of quantitative and qualitative data will enable WBHA to determine if the program successfully achieves its objectives of reducing depression and enhancing the overall quality of life for older individuals. Moreover, this evaluation will provide valuable insights for future funding decisions and program enhancements, ensuring a robust and thorough assessment. References Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Eggum, N. D. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children's maladjustment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 495-525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131208 Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1983). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4More Articles From Psychology
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
