Question.1566 - Individual Assignment: Section IIID: Evaluation 14/11/2023 15 Possible Points In Progress NEXT UP: Submit Assignment Unlimited Attempts Allowed 30/10/2023 to 16/11/2023 MISSING Attempt 1 Add Comment Details Evaluation: 3-4 pages Select one of the methods used to evaluate change and improvement with clients/client systems (single subject, pretest/posttest or other). Provide a rationale for the evaluation method you selected. Describe the method and how you would facilitate using that method to collect data to assess change and improvement. Note: Most students use a pre and posttest format using a scale or assessment instrument (AB model). Other methods can be used. If you did not do pre and post testing in your internship setting, you have my permission to make up the information of what you would have done if you could. Some instruments like the Beck Depression Instrument have a strong evidence base. Other tools like those developed in clinic for local use or some scale do not. If you have a choice, pick an instrument with a strong evidence base. View Rubric (https://uta.instructure.com/courses/158131/modules/items/6512937) (https://uta.instructure.com/co22/11/2023, 08:25 Individual Assignment: Section IIID: Evaluation https://uta.instructure.com/courses/158131/assignments/1527499 2/2 Availability Dates 30/10/2023 to 16/11/2023 Section IIID: Evaluation Criteria Ratings Pts Evaluation Plan view longer description / 5 pts Rationale view longer description / 5 pts Citations view longer description / 5 pts Total Points: 0 5 to >3 pts Excellent 3 to >1 pts Needs Improvement 1 to >0 pts Poor or Missing 5 to >3 pts Excellent 3 to >1 pts Needs Improvement 1 to >0 pts Poor or Missing 5 to >3 pts Excellent 3 to >1 pts Needs Improvement 1 to >0 pts Poor or Missing (https://uta.instructure.com/courses/158131/modules/items/6512937) (https://uta.instructure.com/co
Answer Below:
Introduction In the constantly evolving profession of social work, where complex issues develop from the intersection of mental health and substance abuse, practical evaluation approaches are essential. This assessment plan delves into the life of Mrs Williams' relative, whose mental health problems, substance abuse, and bipolar disorder necessitate a comprehensive and tailored treatment plan. The preferred assessment approach, the single-subject design, is a suitable tool that thoroughly examines each subject's unique behaviours and responses to treatment (de Andrade et al., 2019). As we work through the case's complexities, the justification and implementation strategy for the selected approach will be covered, emphasising the value of person-centred assessments and evidence-based practices in enhancing the well-being of people dealing with mental health and drug abuse issues (Jones & Vigo, 2023). Selected Evaluation Method: Single Subject Design Rationale As single-subject designs are ideal for assessing the intricate and distinct features of drug usage and mental health problems, they were chosen. The single-subject design in this context enables a focused examination of behaviours, responses, and interventions because each client's journey is unique (Van Norman et al., 2019). Unlike other study approaches, this one specifically considers the needs and experiences of Mrs. Williams' family members, ensuring a complete understanding of their growth. The single-topic approach fits with the holistic and individualised nature of social work practice in mental health by recording subtle changes over time. Its focus on the individual's responsiveness to interventions makes it a suitable option for assessing the 2complex dynamics of mental health, drug misuse, and bipolar disorder in the family member who is the subject of the evaluation (Baird et al., 2022). Key Features of Single Subject Design The single-subject design has unique characteristics that make it appropriate for assessing change and improvement in mental health and substance abuse scenarios. It stands out for paying meticulous attention to each case. This design, above all, recognises that every client is unique and that their experiences and reactions to interventions are intrinsically personal. The complex nature of mental health and drug usage issues is well-suited to this individualised approach, which enables a thorough examination of the client's path (Hope et al., 2023). The emphasis on repeated measurements throughout time is another critical component. The single-subject design allows practitioners to identify trends, fluctuations, or significant adjustments in the client's health by gathering data at various times, which provides a thorough comprehension of behavioural patterns. Moreover, the single-subject design naturally supports the integration of qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative insights, including subjective experiences and tales, go beyond numerical measures to contribute to a comprehensive assessment. This two-way data-gathering method guarantees a deeper comprehension of the client's development by highlighting details that can be missed using only quantitative measurements (Kazdin, 2019). Furthermore, this design's flexibility permits the modification of interventions in response to continuing evaluations. Real-time modifications can be performed to optimize the likelihood of positive outcomes if some techniques are more effective. This iterative method emphasizes the 3significance of customizing interventions to match individual needs, consistent with the client centred ethos of social work. Finally, personalization, frequent assessments, integration of qualitative insights, and flexibility are the essential components of the single-subject design that come together to form a robust assessment framework that is suited to the intricacies of problems related to mental health and substance abuse (Riley-Tillman et al., 2020). Implementation Plan The systematic and client-centred methodology is required for the application of the single topic design in the assessment of mental health and drug abuse issues. Standardised tests, interviews, and behavioral observations are all part of the first phase's extensive baseline examination. Gaining a thorough grasp of the client's present mental health and drug use habits is the primary goal of this initial stage (Jones & Vigo, 2023). Setting goals in concert with others becomes essential after the baseline evaluation. This procedure guarantees that the goals align with the client's difficulties and aspirations by involving the client and Mrs Williams' family members. These objectives provide the framework for further interventions, which include lowering substance usage, boosting mood stability, and raising general well-being. After that, needs-based evidence-based interventions are implemented (Riley-Tillman et al., 2020). They may include a variety of therapeutic approaches, such as medication management, counselling, support groups, and other tried-and-true tactics. Taking into account the 4interdependence of substance misuse and mental health issues, interventions are made to address both. Continuous data collection becomes integral to the implementation plan as the interventions take shape. Daily journals, weekly check-ins, and sporadic assessments with quantitative and qualitative measures are used to record changes in behaviour, mood, and substance use patterns (Kazdin, 2019). Comprehensive statistical techniques, visual aids, and qualitative insights are used to analyse the gathered data. Intending to provide a more thorough knowledge of the efficacy of the implemented interventions, this analysis seeks to uncover patterns, trends, and departures from the baseline. During the implementation phase, the flexibility of the single-subject design becomes evident. Interventions are modified as needed based on the current analysis. Finally, a detailed final assessment is carried out at the end of the evaluation period. This allows for the evaluation of the therapies' overall effects on bipolar disorders, drug abuse, and mental health. The evaluation's findings contribute to the continuous improvement of techniques meant to improve the well-being of people dealing with mental health and drug addiction concerns, as well as to evidence-based social work practices (de Andrade et al., 2019). Conclusion When negotiating the intricate terrain of mental health and drug abuse issues, using the single-topic design turns out to be a wise decision that fits in well with the unique experiences of each client. This all-inclusive assessment plan puts itself at the forefront of evidence-based social work practice with its goal-oriented treatments, tailored evaluations, and flexible iterative 5processes. This method provides a more profound knowledge of the client's journey by revealing subtle trends and shifts through careful data collecting and analysis. As we draw to a close, it is clear that the single subject design, with its built-in adaptability and emphasis on client responsiveness, has the potential to improve the quality of life for the members of Mrs Williams' family as well as for others who are juggling the complex interactions between mental health and drug abuse issues. 67 References Baird, A., Xia, Y., & Cheng, Y. (2022). Consumer perceptions of telehealth for mental health or substance abuse: a Twitter-based topic modelling analysis. JAMIA open, 5(2), ooac028. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac028 De Andrade, D., Elphinston, R. A., Quinn, C., Allan, J., & Hides, L. (2019). The effectiveness of residential treatment services for individuals with substance use disorders: A systematic review. Drug and alcohol dependence, pp. 201, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.03.031 Hope, Ø., Ness, O., Friesinger, J. G., Topor, A., & Bøe, T. D. (2023). ‘Living needs a landscape’: A qualitative study about the role of enabling landscapes for people with mental health and substance abuse problems. Health & Place, 84, 103144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103144 Jones, L., & Vigo, D. (2023). Mental health and substance abuse. In Global Health Essentials (pp. 197-201). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- 33851-9_29 Kazdin, A. E. (2019). Single-case experimental designs. Evaluating interventions in research and clinical practice. Behaviour research and therapy, 117, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.015 Riley-Tillman, T. C., Burns, M. K., & Kilgus, S. P. (2020). Evaluating educational interventions: Single-case design for measuring response to intervention. Guilford Publications. Evaluating Educational Interventions: Single-Case Design for Measuring ... - T. Chris Riley-Tillman, Matthew K. Burns, Stephen P. Kilgus - Google Books Van Norman, E. R., Klingbeil, D. A., & McLendon, K. E. (2019). The influence of measurement error associated with oral reading progress monitoring measures on the consistency and accuracy of nonparametric single-case design effect size outcomes. Remedial and Special Education, 40(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749941More Articles From Psychology
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
