Question.2412 - Dear Esthermarie Gorrin, Read the Heinz dilemma (Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development), and consider what you would do if you were in his place. Write down your answer and the reasons behind it. How would your answer fit in Kohlberg’s stages? Are there other responses that Kohlberg would consider “more moral”? If so, how do you feel about this? Do you think Kohlberg’s “Heinz dilemma” is a good measure of one’s morality? Explain. Additionally, Select ONE of the questions below to discuss. Are people fairly accurate when making attributions about why they have experienced difficulties? What about when good things happen? Describe and illustrate internal and external attributions. What difficulties can occur if individuals are excessively internal in their attributions? What about someone who is excessively external? Recall a time when you or someone you know made an attributional error. What were the circumstances that led to the error and what was the impact of the error? How does our individualistic culture tend to support correspondence bias? Explain. Using an example to support your ideas, explain what has been called the “victim mentality” in terms of attribution. APA Citation https://www.simplypsychology.org/kohlberg.html#con
Answer Below:
Discussion In case, I would have been in place of Heinz, I could have immediately filed a complaint against the local chemist in the local police station who had been charging ten times the money it cost for making the drug. As my wife had been suffering from cancer as well as had been dying and as this has been an emergency matter, I could have tried to arrange the drug by some other means urgently or request the police for giving the drug to me from the chemist’s house as soon as possible on the whole. The Heinz dilemma has been a commonly utilized example used for assisting human beings in understanding the three stages of the ethical development of Kohlberg as well. These three different levels of ethical reasoning Kohlberg are conventional, pre-conventional as well as post-conventional. In these ways, my answer could fit the stages of Kohlberg. No, there are no other responses that Kohlberg could consider ‘more moral’ (Thomas & Dong, 2014). Yes, I think that Kohlberg’s ‘Heinz dilemma’ has been a good measure in regards to one’s morality on the whole. Kohlberg highlighted that it has been a means of an individual reason regarding a problem that identifies positive ethical growth as well. In addition, the ‘Heinz dilemma’ created by Kohlberg discusses the thought as well as the idea of obeying the rule versus saving a life as a whole. Several of the analysis of Kohlberg has been based upon Heinz's dilemma that discovers in what ways human beings defend as well as justify their actions when placed in the same ethical dilemmas as such (Giammarco, 2016). 4 The individualistic cultures have been that cultures strain the requirements of the individual over the requirements of the group on the whole. Moreover, the correspondence bias has been the trend for concluding the continuing as well as distinctive characters of the human beings from the behaviors that could be wholly described by the conditions where they take place as a whole. In the individualistic traditions, human beings have been viewed as self-directed as well as independent as well. The correspondence bias has been primarily evaluated by certain attitude ratings on the whole (Chui et al. 2010). In these ways, the individualistic culture of the human beings wishes to support the correspondence bias. References Chui, A. C., Titman, S., & Wei, K. J. (2010). Individualism and momentum around the world. The Journal of Finance, 65(1), 361-392. Giammarco, E. A. (2016). The measurement of individual differences in morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 26-34. Thomas, S. J., & Dong, Y. (2014). The Defining Issues Test of moral judgment development. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(3), 55.More Articles From Psychology
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
