Question.722 - Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-1: ? Question 1: Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. ? Question 2: Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence. Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-2 (page 2): ? Question 3: Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw. ? Question 4: Massasoit’s decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.) ? Question 5: Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims. Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-3 (page 3): ? Question 6: How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it. Module Seven: Thinking About History, Learning Block 7-4 (page 2): ? Question 7: Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite. ? Question 8: Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: “The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it.” Cite at least three historical facts that support your position.
Answer Below:
Module Seven Short responses –question 1 Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Colonial lens: This lens looks at the history of the European colonization of the Americas and its impact on Native American societies. Cultural Lens: This lens examines the cultural values and beliefs of Natives and white settlers, and how these have impacted the relationship between the two groups. Intersectional Lens: This lens examines the unique experiences of different groups of people regarding their race, class, gender, sexuality, religion, and other identity markers. Module Seven Short responses –question 2 Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence. The relationship between Natives and white settlers has been complex and multifaceted throughout history, shaped by various factors, including systemic and structural power dynamics, cultural values and beliefs, and intersectional identities. This relationship has been characterized by collaboration and conflict, with both groups having to negotiate and navigate different aspects of their identities to survive and thrive. Module Seven Short responses –question 3 Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw. The economic lens, social lens, and political lens are the three lenses that I could use to look at the events described in the video. Module Seven Short responses –question 4 Massasoit’s decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.) One event that was a factor in Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was the arrival of the English to the area. Another event was the destruction of the nearby Wampanoag village of Nemasket by another Native American tribe, the Narragansettss. Module Seven Short responses –question 5 Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims. Short-term Consequence: The short-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims was sharing resources, skills, and knowledge that allowed them to survive in their new environment. Long-term Consequence: The long-term a consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims was the erosion of Wampanoag culture and language as they were increasingly assimilated into the settler culture. Module Seven Short responses –question 6 How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it. Before researching and writing about the relationship between Natives and white settlers, I had a very limited view of the events. I believed that the Pilgrims had arrived in the New World and taken over the land with little regard for the Natives who had already been living there. However, after researching and writing about the topic, I realized that the relationship between the two groups was more complex and nuanced. The alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims was an example of how both groups could work together and benefit from each other despite their differences. I had only fully appreciated this after researching and writing about it. Module Seven Short responses –question 7 Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite. 1. Structural Lens: This lens examines the systemic and structural factors that shaped the Cherokee Removal events. Specifically, it looks at how different policies, laws, and regulations enabled and encouraged the removal of the Cherokee Nation from their ancestral lands. 2. Political Lens: This lens examines the political decisions and agendas that led to the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specifically, it looks at how different political actors pursued their interests and agendas to facilitate the removal of the Cherokee Nation from their ancestral lands. 3. Cultural Lens: This lens examines the cultural values and beliefs of both the Cherokee Nation and the white settlers and how these have impacted the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specifically, it looks at how different cultural practices and values have been used to reinforce or challenge the power dynamics between the two groups. 4. Intersectional Lens: This lens examines the unique experiences of different groups of people regarding their race, class, gender, sexuality, religion, and other identity markers. Specifically, it looks at how these different factors intersect and shape both the experiences of the Cherokee Nation and white settlers regarding the events of the Cherokee Removal. Module Seven Short responses –question 8 Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: “The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it.” Cite at least three historical facts that support your position. I agree with the thesis statement that the Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party opposed it correctly. Three historical facts that support this position are: 1. The Treaty of New Echota was signed in 1835 by a small minority of the Cherokee Nation who did not have the authority to represent the interests of the entire tribe. 2. The Treaty of New Echota was never ratified by the U.S. Senate and was, therefore, not legally binding. 3. The Treaty of New Echota violated the existing treaties between the Cherokee Nation and the United States, which had previously granted the Cherokee Nation the right to stay in their ancestral lands.More Articles From History
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
