Question.681 - In Week #6 of Modern U.S. History, students will learn about the end of the Cold War and the beginning of the War on Terror (1987-2007). Students will do the assigned readings, and look at the Week #6 overview (which includes highlighted terms with Internet links). [The overview is available in the course overview section.] Students will listen to a lecture on three presidents: George Bush I, Bill Clinton, and George Bush II. The lecture is available in the course overview section. Students will complete 4 assignments, due on Monday noon, 7/11. The assignments are: a 1 1/2-page topics paper, a 1-page movie paper, a quiz on "The Grapes of Wrath," and the final exam.
Answer Below:
Bride of Spies Steven Spielberg directed bridge of Spies in 2015. The plot writers were Matt Charman, Joel Coen, and Ethan Coen. The leading actors were Tom Hanks (who played the role of Donovan), Alan Alda, and Mark Rylance. Considering the true event from week 6's reading, Bridge of Spies depicts the?Cold War as a?historical melodrama starring New York lawyer James Donovan, his case, Soviet spy Rudolf Ivanovich Abel, and American U-2 pilot Francis Gary. After losing,?representing Abel in a US courtroom in 1957, Donovan traveled to Berlin in 1962 to negotiate a captive swap. Abel could return to America, and so did Gary, who had gotten gunned down across the Soviet Union in 1960, and another young American who had been jailed behind the Berlin Wall. The film's major resource was Donovan's personal narrative of the incident, Strangers on a Bridge, published in 1964. The movie tends to depict the judicial process pertaining to Abel's case, where Abel, under the suspicion of espionage put in custody. With the robust structure of the United States Judicial system, the suspect was able to find a representative named Donovan, who was an insurance lawyer, to take up the case. Although he was dedicated to representing the judicial system, Donovan was facing rejection from the public for representing a spy, but his only notion was that even a spy was supposed to get a fair trial. Donovan fights for a fair trial for Abel since his belongings were illegally confiscated, and the government had no authority to do so without a legal warrant; rather, in Abel's case, they had taken the belongings as a piece of evidence. Donovan was arguing the trial to depict the comprehension that the case was inclined towards a biased approach without providing Abel the constitutional rights. During the 1960s, Abels case was brought to the Supreme court; on the other side, at the same time CIA ordered Francis Gray mission, who flew over the lands of Soviet territory to procure pictorial evidence; he was captured, while at the same time, Donovan argued for Abel to fly to their homeland. The American officials, despite Donovan's plea, declined to assist him as a mediator; therefore, he might be negotiating as an American citizen without a?guarantee of help if his safety was in jeopardy. These negotiations, as depicted in Bridge of Spies in a factually realistic approach, demonstrate the United States' Cold War manipulative methods. Regardless of the fact that the process was rigged against him, Donovan nevertheless was?effective in convincing the Soviet Union to release Francis Gary Powers in exchange for Abel, and also East Germany to release Frederick L. Pryor, an American doctoral scholar detained upon false premises. The movie tends to depict a biased overview that the masses could possess when it is in favor of their perception. The underlying emotion brought the cold war alive to the present generation; as seen through Abel's case, the public hatred was fueled rather than considering the fair, ethical judicial structure. However, the case was an opportunity for the United States to recognize its own values.More Articles From History
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
