Question.713 - Instructions Your outline must be submitted in a formal outline format as shown below. The outline should demonstrate enough detail to make it clear that you have considered the organization of your paper, including the research required for your topic, and the planned sections for your paper. At the end of your outline, please provide a listing of the sources which you have already identified for use in creating your paper.
Answer Below:
Philosophy Paper Outline Mary Rea Unitek College Course Code: PHIL415 BAKE-BSNA 20 B3 S6C1-PHIL415 Professor Mark ArandiaSeptember 13th, 2022 Animal Rights I. Introduction & Background ??A. Introduction ? ? ?1. The introduction section tends to address the Whats and Whys Animal Rights were implemented since the purpose was to ensure animals are provided a safe haven from inanimate objects. ? ? ?2. The US Animal Welfare Act (Draft) During the late 1960s, the United States implemented the Animal welfare act, it is important to understand that the Animal Welfare act is the only core federal legislation that tries to protect animals, although the law tends to exclude several species from protection ("Animal Rights", 2022; DAVIS, 2016; "The Moral Status of Animals (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)", 2013). The overall implementation of the Animal Welfare Act structure tends to be narrower and unclear to certain domestic species. On the other hand, there is robust protection considering transportation or sales of certain species, while this also includes handling. The Animal welfare Act also addresses psychological factors pertaining to animals utilized for live experiments.? However, the act does not address the rights pertaining to the autonomy of the animals while covering only certain welfare protections.?? B. History of Animal Rights in the United States 1. Details of the Subpoint (Draft of Animal Rights History) The right to protect animals dates back to the early 1640s, during the American Colonial period when the body of liberties was enacted by the Massachusetts general court that violated cruel behavior or activities again brute creatures that were under mans use, and it also safeguarded the animals with appropriate resting periods ("Animal Rights", 2022; DAVIS, 2016; "The Moral Status of Animals (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)", 2013). Over the period of time, during the civil war, the loss of horses reflected the bleak structure of animal rights over the years, which led the nation towards the penultimate moment during the late 1860s that enabled the policing authorities pertaining to prosecute abuse. Several states were implementing anticruelty and Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals models to protect animals. II. Apply at least three terms/concepts from the textbook ??A. Applying critical thinking to existing animal rights ? ? ?1. Rational analysis of animal rights ? ? ? ? ? ?(Draft) Considering one of the angles of animal rights through critical thinking, that through an ethical lens, causing harm to any living being is wrong, such as killing them to consume them for food or be it testing for human use products and other purposes does this pertain to rights? However, the underlying notion of animal rights tends to consider that animals do have minds that enable them to feel pain when harmed through consciousness. From the utilitarian viewpoint, the animals tend to experience pain and pleasure just as other beings; this approach should be enabled to assess the varying dynamics of how animals tend to feel suffering from their own standpoint ("Animal Rights", 2022; DAVIS, 2016; "The Moral Status of Animals (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)", 2013). On the other hand, the adaptability of the rights as a legal foundation since it is made by men it can be altered based on location and time frame. Critically assessing the rights bound legally tends to miss out on ethical values. From a moral perspective, if any of the actions tend to cause harm in a painful manner, it is morally unlawful; this brings us to a moral battle over what is permissible in terms of morality. The conclusion paper tries to draw is that any human actions in accordance with human benefit or demand should not be causing harm to animals; such interventions shall be morally permissible.? While considering the consumption pattern of human demand, animals can only be consumed by killing them that is, by causing harm. The animal rights act stands firm with a core value that every being has the right not to suffer needlessly unless there is a moral backing to it.? ? ??B. Philosophical understanding of existing animal rights ? ? ?1. Philosophical status of animals? ? ? ? ?(Draft) Pertaining to factory farming animals, where animals are bred in order to serve the industrial purpose for consumption. According to the report from Stanford, on average, 8 billion animals are born who were bred to be served for the food consumption industry; the question draws when the livestock living conditions are not meeting the ethical contemplations.? ??C. Human relations to animal rights ? ? ?1. Perception of ethical/moral experience between human beings and animals 2. More details of the Subpoint (Draft) In terms of rational argumentations and behaviors toward animal protection through the viewpoint safeguarding rights tends to extend the boundaries of the human relation to animal rights, such as humans posing a diverse moral status when it comes to rights, while animal rights have derived its core values from not harming the animals, while killing is an offense to human being and not to animals. Although this is a vast topic, the underlying notion is to question why there is a barrier when it comes to ethical experience in life.? ? III. Argument in favor of existing animal rights ??A. Do livestock get to live in an outside world before becoming food? ? ? ?1. Should the life of livestock be considered? ? ? ?2. More details of the Subpoint? (Draft) The primary value is to bring an equitable balance between the ethical claim and the ethical boundaries of animal rights.? ??B. Importance of animal rights? ? ? ?1. ethical farms and how cruelty over animals impacts the animal rights ? ? ?2. More details of the Subpoint? ? ? ? ? ? ?(Draft) Should philosophical considerations be made to animal rights? There is a massive operational industry that operates that might suffer when the boundaries of narrowed, causing havoc to the entire food industry; on the other hand, it could lead to better control of environmental issues in terms of greenhouse gases, lowering the wastage of water and other resources, and also naturally controlling the forest covers.?In the larger picture, it would reduce cruelty to animals and also ensure appropriate protection. IV. Arguments against existing animal rights ??A. Industry dependency? ? ? ?(Draft) The food industry is a huge market with several people depending on it for employment. Considering all the farms, fast food sectors, cold storage, and other manufacturing facilities.?? ??B. Consequences of animal rights? ? ? ?1. Details of the Subpoint ? ? ?2. More details of the Subpoint? ? ? ? ? ? ?(Draft) In terms of consumption, the rate of protein from animals is high. On the other hand, due to social trends and awareness, people are exploring a much greener source of food supply. This also includes the fur industry since the fashion industry is aware of the diminishing animal global trends.? V. Conclusion (Draft) Although animal rights could be challenging when considering ethical values, it addresses the cognitive and vulnerabilities of various perspectives.? ? VI. APA style in-text citations and references Animal Rights. (2022). Retrieved from https://thehumaneleague.org/article/animal-rights DAVIS, J. (2016). The History of Animal Protection in the United States | The American Historian. Retrieved from https://www.oah.org/tah/issues/2015/november/the-history-of-animal-protection-in-the-united-states/ Hereth, B. (2021, May 25). Animal rights Pacifism.?Philosophical Studies,?178(12), 4053-4082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01636-x Regan, T. (1987). The case for animal rights. In Advances in animal welfare science 1986/87 (pp. 179-189). Springer, Dordrecht. Regan, T. (2001). Defending animal rights. University of Illinois Press. Regan, T. (2004). The case for animal rights. Univ of California Press. Rollin, B. E. (2010). Animal rights & human morality. Prometheus Books. The Moral Status of Animals (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). (2013). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-animal/More Articles From Philosophy
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
