Question.5171 - How would you assign responsibility for the VW scandal? What should have been done differently and by whom? 2) Who are the stakeholders in this case? How were the interests of each stakeholder represented? 3) Is it fair to expect any employees, including professionals such as engineers and accountants, to confront management over directives that they believe are unethical? 4) What changes to the VW board would you recommend that might help prevent future scandals? 5) The codetermination principle was created to ensure that employees have a role in managerial decision making, thus creating a more democratic workplace. What are the benefits of this model? What are the disadvantages? 6) What do you understand by “independent” board member? Who or what should an independent board member represent that would be different from other board members?
Answer Below:
BUS 220 OT 4 - Business Ethics Case study: "Volkswagen's Diesel Fraud"How would you assign responsibility for the VW scandal? What should have been do...
BUS xx - xxxxxxxx Ethics xxxx study xxxxxxxxxxxx Diesel xxxxx How xxxxx you xxxxxx responsibility xxx the xx scandal xxxx should xxxx been xxxx differently xxx by xxxx I xxxxx assign xxxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxx VW xxxxxxx across xxxxxxxx levels xx the xxxxxxx First x would xxxxxx responsibility xx the xxxxxxxxx who xxxxxxxxx implemented xxx defeat xxxxxx software xxxxxxxx working xxxxx pressure xxxx the xxxxxxxx to xxxx cost xxx performance xxxxx I xxxxx assign xxxxxxxxxxxxxx to xxx senior xxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxx unrealistic xxxxxxxxxxxx lack xx flexibility xxx failure xx encourage xxxx communication xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxxx also xxxxxx responsibility xx the xxxxxxxx and xxx entire xxxxxxxxxx of xx for xxx unfavorable xxxxxxxxx culture xxxxx discouraged xxxxxxxxxxx authority xxx organization xxxxxxx a xxxxx hierarchy xxxx did xxx allow xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx made xx the xxxxxx executives xx addition x would xxxxxx responsibility xx the xxxxx of xxxxxxxxx which xxxxxx in xxx overall xxxxxxxxxxx roles xxxx were xxx aware xx many xxxxxxxxxxxx happening xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx extended xxxxxxxxxx s xxxxxxxx just xxxxxx the xxxxxxx became xxxxxx There xxx things xxxx should xxxx been xxxx differently xx this xxxx The xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx engineers xxxxxx have xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx to xxxxxx any xxxxxxxxx practices xxx company x executive xx senior xxxxxxxxxx should xxxx accepted xxx technical xxxxxxxxx even xx they xxxx costly xx would xxxx saved xxx company xxxx getting xxxx the xxxx it xxxxx itself xx The xxxxx of xxxxxxxxx should xxxx taken xxx role xxxx seriously xxx demanded xxxxxxx including xxxxxxx transparency xxx encouraged xx open xxxxxxx that xxxxxx questioning xxx management xxx are xxx stakeholders xx this xxxx How xxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxx stakeholder xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxx case xxxxxxx Employees xxxxx include xxxxxxxxx who xxx under xxxxxxxx to xxxx unrealistic xxxxxxxxxxx goals xxxx suffered xxxx poor xxxxxxxxxxxxxx culture xxx a xxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx Customers xx s xxxxx advertisement xxxxxxxx its xxxxxxx about xxx clean xxxxxx technology xxxxxxxxxxxxx regulators xxxx includes xxx EPA xxx were xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxx VW xxxxxxxxxxxx They xxxxxxxx financial xxxx due xx a xxxx in xxxxx values xxx also xxxxx issues xxxx followed xxx public xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxx smart xxxxxxxxxx was x deception xxx public xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx were xxxxxxx to x high xxxxx of xxxxxxxxx VW xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Although xxxx did xxx have x role xx decision xxxxxx they xxxxxxxx financial xxxx from xxx drop xx value xx the xxxxxxx stock xxxxx customers xxxxx not xxx the xxxx due xx the xxxxxxxxx performance xxxxx the xxxxxxx became xxxxxx Board xxxxxxx They xxxxx they xxx not xxxx what xxx happening xxxxx others xxx conflicting xxxxxxxxx German xxxxxxxxxx It xxx on xxx board xxx owned xx stock xxxx criticized xxx delay xx VW x confession xx it xxxx to xxxxxx any xxxxxxxxx including xxxxxxxxxxxxx such xx engineers xxx accountants xx confront xxxxxxxxxx over xxxxxxxxxx that xxxx believe xxx unethical xxx it xx fair xx expect xxx employees xxxxxxxxx professionals xxxx as xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx management xxxx directives xxxx they xxxxxxx are xxxxxxxxx However xx did xxx support x culture xxxx encouraged xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx unethical xxxxxxxxxx As x result xx employee xx professional xxxx out xx a xxxxxxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx decisions xxx organization xxxxxx an xxxxxxxx mechanism xxxx encouraged xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx actions xxxx changes xx the xx board xxxxx you xxxxxxxxx that xxxxx help xxxxxxx future xxxxxxxx I xxxxx recommend xxxxxxxxxxxx an xxxxxxxx audit xxxx is xxxxxxxx by xxxxxxxxxxx directors xxx audit xxxxx help xxxxxxx possible xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx the xxxx action xxxxxx it xx too xxxx I xxxxx recommend xxxx communication xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx boards xx enhance xxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxxx recommend xxx protection xx whistleblowers xx establishing x reporting xxxxxxxxx that xxxxx reporters xxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxx will xxxx reward xxxxxxxxxxxxxx for xxx information xxxx will xxxxxxxxx every xxxxxxxx including xxx professionals xx remain xxxxxxxx of xxx business xxxxxxxxxx happening x would xxxxxxxxx an xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx board xxxxxxx to xxxx improve xxxxxxxxx of xxx running xx the xxxxxxx In xxxxxxxx I xxxxx reduce xxxxxxxxxxx loyalties xx limiting xxx number xx board xxxxx held xx government xxxxxxxxx family xxxxxxx or xxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx principle xxx created xx ensure xxxx employees xxxx a xxxx in xxxxxxxxxx decision xxxxxx thus xxxxxxxx a xxxx democraticworkplace xxxx are xxx benefits xx this xxxxx What xxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx BenefitsThe xxxxx helps xxxxxxx interest xx employees xxxx as xxxxxxxxx conditions xxx ensure xxx security xx gives xxxxxxxxx a xxxxx in xxxxxxxxx governance xx improves xxxxx relations xxx encourages xxxxxx responsibilities xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx can xxxxxx independent xxxxxxxxx especially xxxx the xxxxx members xxx not xxxxxxx on xxxxxxxxx performance xxx integrity xx can xxxxxx conflicts xx interest xxxxxxxxxx when xxxxx members xxxxx more xx protection xx job xxxx required xxxxxxxxxxxxx In xxx case xx VW xx can xxxx difficult xx making xxxxxxxxx reforms xxxx do xxx understand xx independent xxxxx member xxx or xxxx should xx independent xxxxx member xxxxxxxxx that xxxxx be xxxxxxxxx from xxxxx board xxxxxxx An xxxxxxxxxxx board xxxxxx is xxxxxxx who xxx offer xxxxxxxxx judgment xxxxxxx a xxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx Such x member xxxx not xxxx a xxxxxx financial xx employment xxxxxxxxxx to xxx organization xx its xxxxxxxxxx However xxx individual xx accountable xx all xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxx public xxxxxxxx An xxxxxxxxxxx member xxxxxx represent xxxxxxx governance xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
