Question.3279 - Ethical relativism holds that ethical values are relative to particular people, cultures, or times. Relativism denies that there can be any rationally justified or objective ethical judgments. When there are ethical disagreements between people or cultures, the ethical relativist concludes that there is no way to resolve that dispute and prove one side is right or more reasonable than the other. Consider Edward Liddy’s description of the AIG bonuses as “distasteful.” Ordinarily we think of matters of taste as personal, subjective things. You enjoy spicy Indian food, while I prefer simple Midwestern meat and potatoes. It is all a matter of personal taste. Liddy may have found the bonuses distasteful, but others like the taste in food; it all depends on or is all relative to one’s own background, culture and personal opinions. Do you believe that there is no way to decide what is ethically right or wrong? Imagine a teacher returns an assignment to you with the grade of “F”. When you ask for an explanation you are told that frankly the teacher does not believe that people “like you” are capable of doing good work in this field. When you object that this is unfair and wrong the teacher offers a relativist explanation. “Fairness is a matter of personal opinion,” the professor explains. “Who determines what is fair or unfair?” you ask. Your teacher claims that his view of what is fair is as valid as any other. Because everyone is entitled to their own personal opinion, he is entitled to fail you since, in his personal opinion you do not deserve to succeed. Discuss the following questions related to this scenario: 1. Would you accept this explanation and be content with your failing grade? If not, how would you defend your own, opposing view? 2. Are there any relevant facts on which you would rely on to support your claim? 3. What values are involved in this dispute? 4. What alternatives are available to you? 5. Besides you and your teacher, are there any other people who are or should be involved in this situation, any other stakeholders? 6. What reasons would you offer to the dean in an appeal to have the grade changed? 7. What consequences would this professor’s practice have on education? 8. If reasoning and logical persuasion do not work, how else could this dispute be resolved? Other than reasoning and logical persuasion, what is the major alternative for resolving conflicts? Of course, the most common alternatives have been force and violence.
Answer Below:
If x would xxxx been xx place xx the xxxxxxx then xxxxxxxxxx I xxxxx have xxx accepted xxx explanation xxx would xxxxxx content xxxx the xxxxxxx grade xxxxxxx no xxx can xxxxx whether xxx people xxx capable xx doing xxxx work xx not xxxx the xxxxxxx believed xxxx the xxxxxx like xxx are xxx capable xx doing xxx good xxxx which xx not xxxxxxx on xxx part xx the xxxxxxx a xxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx as x guide x philosopher xxx a xxxxxx too xx if xxx pe xxxx is xxx capable xx doing xxx good xxxx he xx supposed xx teach xxx instead xx giving xxxx relativist xxxxxxx Everybody xxxx on xxxx earth xxx a xxxxxx Quality xxx so xxxxxx can xx good xxxx in xxx field xxxxxx comes xxxxxxxx or xxxxxxx person xxxx their xxxxxx s xxxx they xxxxx it xxxx their xxxxxxx who xxx regarded xx the xxxxx and xxx foremost xxxxxxx of xxx child xx from xxxxx teacher xx such xxxx of xxxxxxxx is xxx accepted xxxx the xxxxxxx as xx is xxx ethical xxx I xxxxx rely xx to xxxxxxx of xx claim xxxxxxx it xx suitable xxx any xxxxxxx or xxxxxx for xxx person xx ask xxxxx their xxxxxxxxxxx Rather xx can xxxx it xx be xxx right xx get xxx answer xxx our xxxxx So xx the xxxxxxx has xxxxx the xxxxxxxx for xxx grade x the xxxxxxx frankly xxxxxxx him xxxx people xxxx he xx not xxxxxxx of xxxxx good xxxx because xxxx is xxx ethical xx the xxxx of xxx Teacher xxx could xxxx behaved xx an xxxxxxx manner xx highlighting xxx drawbacks xx the xxxxxxx any xxx by xxxxxx him xxx relativist xxxxxx She xxxxx have xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxx politely xxx should xxxx given xxx tips xx improve xxx work xx according xx me xxxx kind xx behavior xxxx not xxxx a xxxxxxxxxx of x teacher xxx value xx Fairness xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx are xxxxxxxx in xxxx Dispute xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx and xxx teacher xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx has xxxxx about xxx fairness xx the xxxxx and xxx teacher xxxxx him x relativist xxxxxxx stating xxx that xxxxxxxx is x matter xx personal xxxxxxx Fairness xx not x matter xx personal xxxxxxx one xxxxxx have x proper xxxxxxxxxxxxx towards x fairness xx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx matter xxxxxx are xxxx only xxxx they xxx associated xxxx the xxxxxx For xxxxxxx throwing xxxxxxx on xxx road xx not xxxx because xx ethical xxxxx are xxxxxxxxxx with xx because xxxxxx don x regard xx fair xxx be xxxxxx who xx this xxxxxxxx work xxxxxx it xx do xx but xx can x be xxxxxxxx as xxxx merely xxxxxxx he xxxxx to xx that xxxx of xxxx One xxxx to xx truthful xx the xxxx which xx commits xx perform xxx it xxxxxx be xxxx enough xxxxxxx the xxxxx of xxxxx party xxxx Moreover xx should xx backed xx the xxxxxx of xxxxxx The xxxxx alternatives xxxxx is xxxxxxxxx to xx is xxxx I xxxxx have xxxxxxxx my xxxx with xxx other xxxxxxxxxx of xxxx or xxxx could xxxx asked xxxxx to xx through xx work xx that x could xxxx a xxxxxxxxx about xx work xxx then x would xxxxx pursue xx teacher xxx would xxx her xxxxx the xxxxx things xx the xxxxxxxx which x have xxxxxxxxx in xx work xxx would xxxxxx make xxxx not xx commit xxx such xxxx of xxxxxxxx yet xxxxx in xxx future xxx beside xx and xx teachers xxx other xxxxxx who xxxxxx have xxxx involved xx this xxxxxxx are xxx classmate xxx the xxxxx teacher x would xxxx asked xxx Dean xx get xx work xxxxxxxx again xxx then xxxxx have xxxxx him xxx changing xx grade xxxx kind xx practice xx the xxxxxxx would xxxx negative xxxxxx on xxx Education xxxxxx This xxxxxxx could xxxx resolved xxxxxxx the xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx teacher xxx not xx force xx violence xxxxxxx this xxxx of xxxxxxxx is xxx ethicalMore Articles From Ethics
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
