Question.5433 - Week 6 Case Discussion ReflectionDetailsAssignment ObjectiveThe purpose of this assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to synthesize information learned from others to enhance your capacity to formulate answers to case questions. NOTE: You do not need to paste your original post for Q1, given that it was your completed worksheet. You should, however, still address two points regarding your original worksheet that you would or wouldn't change and why.InstructionsTo complete your assignment, complete the three steps below for each of this week's case discussion questions:1. Carefully review your own original post and reply posts from fellow discussants for each .2. Carefully review original posts of other discussants.3. Identify and briefly discuss two major points from own original post that you would modify OR would not modify based on what you learned from the original posts and reply posts of members of your discussion group. Provide specific evidence for modifying or not modifying each point. Put another way, what would you change or not change about your original post, after reviewing what others wrote. In either case, provide specific evidence for your choice.Use outline below to format your paper:Case Discussion Reflection: Week ___Q1- Original Post: NOT NEEDED, since it was your original, completed worksheet.First point you would change or not change and why: Second point you would/would not change and why: Q2- Original Post: [paste your original post here]First point you would/would not change and why: Second point you would/would not change and why:Your reflection for each discussion question should be 150 to 200 words, not including your pasted original post.
Answer Below:
MGMT xxxx Discussion xxxxxxxxxx Week x - xxxxxxxx Post xxxx is xxxxxxx and xxx really x direct xxxxxxxxxx post xx is xxxx like x group xxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxx contributions xxxx of xxx students xxxxxxxxx late xxxxxx included x major xxxx that x need xx take xx to xxxxxx sufficient xxxx to xxxxx the xxxx and xxxxxx it xx perfection x - xxxxxxxx Post xxxxx price-sensitivity xxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxx Zentein xxxxxx not xxxxx its xxxxx Low xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx from xxxx and xxxxxxx Zentein's xxxxxxx bars xxx distinguished xxxxxxx their xxxxxx utilization xx collagen xxxx protein xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxx sustainable xxxxxxxxxxx Halbouni xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx counterparts xxxx Built xx Grenade xxxxxxxxx bars xxx bespoke xxx target xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx health-oriented xxxxxx prioritizing xxxxxxx over xxxx Halbouni xxxx high xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx price xxxxxxxxxxx will xx low xxxxx customers xxxx see xxxx value xx the xxxxxxx and xxxx be xxxx likely xx opt xxx cheaper xxxxxxxxxxx Dolan xxxxxxxxx Second xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx indicator xxxx suggests xxxxxxx should xxx lower xxx price xxx motivated xx prestigeEvidence xx support xxxx case xxx reading xxxxxxxxx target xxxxxx are xxxxxxxx healthy- xxxxx consumers xxx care xxxx about xxxxxxx and xxxxx ingredients xxxx price xxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx bar xxxxxxxx has xxxxxxxx brands xxxx as xxxxx Nu xxxxx can xxxxxx a xxxxxx price xx marketing xxxxxxxxxx as xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx quality xx well xx general xxxxxx benefits xxxxxxxx Because xxxxxxxxx target xxxxxx is xxx necessarily xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx but xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx reducing xxx price xxxxx likely xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxx quality xx the xxxxx instead xx gaining xxxx consumers xxxxx Gourville xxxxx thing xxx would xxxxx not xxxxxx and xxx I xxxxx not xxxxx my xxxxxxxx on xxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx can xx differentiated xx reading xxxxx students' xxxxxxxxx some xx them xxxx indicated xxxxxxxxx product xxxxxxxxxxx like xxxxx collagen xxx quality xxxxxxxxxxx as xxx main xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx It xxx noted xx one xx the xxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx of xxxxxxx bars xxx probably xxxxxx them xxx the xxxxxx benefits xxxx have xxx may xxx necessarily xxxx a xxxxxxx protein xxx Also xxxxxxxx into xxxxxxxx behavior xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxx lowers xxxx a xxxxxxx is xxxxxx differentiated xxxxx Gourville xx my xxxxxxxx is xx concert xxxx these xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx perspectives x would xxx alter xxxx point xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx point xxx would xxxxx not xxxxxx and xxx I xxxxx somewhat xxxxxxxx my xxxxx as xx why xxxxxxxxx target xxxxxx would xxx be xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Whereas x had xxxxxxxxx contended xxxx Zentein xxxxxxxx value xxxxxxx above xxxxx a xxxx by x friend xxxxxxx out xxxx luxury xxxxxx tend xx bestow x prestige xxxx on xxxxxxx regardless xx whether xx not xxxx actually xxxx as xxxxxx That xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxx Zentein xx not x prestige xxxxx such xx Alani xx its xxxxxxx mechanism xxxx operate xx preserve xxx perceived xxxxx Therefore x would xxxxxx my xxxxxxxx to xx cognizant xxxx price xxxxxxxxxx may xxxxx to xxxxx people's xxxxxxxxxx unconsciously xxxx placing xxxxxxx in xxx lower-quality xxxx despite xxxxxxxx not xxxxxxxxxxx being xxx primary xxxxxxxxx factorMore Articles From MKTG 6200 Strategic Marketing Management