Question.2433 - CRITICAL SUMMARY PAPER ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONSOVERVIEW Complete the following questions for each book assigned to a Required Reading Critical Summary. As these books were selected to provide deep insight to Strategic Communication and how it was formulated, shaped, changed, as well as how it should be applied to your future works, you should be showing a high level of critical thinking in the formulation of your thoughts. Formal APA formatting is required. INSTRUCTIONS A well-constructed Critical Summary Paper Assignment will include the following elements: ? Introduction, featuring a fresh and clear thesis. ? Body, featuring major critical points that were themed or critically curated by you, the reader. ? Minimal quotes. Use of quotes should be reserved for making the most significant points. ? Supported by a minimum of 5 scholarly extractions of the author, indicated by in-text citations. ? Strong topic sentences for each paragraph. These should transition and connect ideas, as well as guide the reader through the paper. ? Conclusion, featuring strong statements regarding how the thesis was developed / proven in the body of the paper. This portion of the paper should also make it clear how future research of the subject could be impacted by the ideas here. Critical Summary Paper Assignments should be a minimum of 750 words. Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.DIGI 700Critical Summary Paper: Ong Assignment Ong, W. (2002). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the world. New York, NY: Routeledge. ISBN: 9780415027960.Walter Ong brings us through the ideas of technological determinism. He moves us through how relationships, orality, the development of words, and the movement of everyone becoming literate has changed the world. Although Ong does not specifically speak about Strategic Communication, he does address how communication shifts determine power, needs, dependencies and much more. Q1: In his own way, how does Ong understand that strategic communication transformations are taking place? How would he talk about these transitions? Q2: What is the significance of second orality? How is this valuable to your research interest? Q3: How is Ong relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What are two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment? Critical Summary Paper: Ellul Assignment Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Toronto, Canada: ISBN 9780394703909. Jacques Ellul challenges the efficient adoption of technique through technology. His concerns raise questions about the inherent logic of its development. Ellul suggests that without a rigorous course of action, de-humanization is the only outcome. Ellul’s through and cautionary considerations, while most commonly associated with twentieth century thought, are vital to the ongoing conversation surrounding Strategic Communication. Q1: In his own way, how does Ellul understand that strategic communication transformations are taking place? How would talk about these transitions? Q2: What are three complications from technology highlighted by Ellul? How are these valuable to your research interest? Q3: How is Ellul relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment?DIGI 700Critical Summary Paper: Postman Assignment Postman, N. (1993). Technolopy: The surrender of culture to technology. New York, NY: Vintage Books/Random House. ISBN: 9780679745402.Neil Postman is a self-proclaimed provocateur, yet many interpret him as a chronic pessimist because of his insightful critiques of technology’s impact of culture and life. In particular, his definition of totalitarian technocracy provides a compelling perspective on the impact of technology on everything from communication to physical problems. Postman looks deep into culture shifts and even suggest a theology of technology. Because of his critical insights and challenging spirit, he plays an important role in conversations past, present, and future. Q1: In his own way, how does Postman understand that strategic communication transformations are taking place? How would one talk about these transitions? Q2: What is the significance of technolopoly? How are these insights valuable to your research interest? Q3: How is Postman relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment? Critical Summary Paper: McLuhan Assignment McLuhan, M. (1999). The medium and the light: Reflections on religion and media. Eugene, OR: Stoddart. ISBN: 9780415027960.Marshall McLuhan is regarded for two ideas that have shaped communication conversations—theoretical and practical—for decades: 1) we can NEVER stop communicating, and 2) the medium is the message. As he applies communication to the traditions in the church, it becomes essential to consider how strategic communication can be engaged in a traditionally theological setting. In other words, what happens when strategic communication and spiritual life intersect? Q1: In his own way, how does McLuhan understand that Strategic Communication transformations are taking place? How would he talk about these transitions in the two unique contexts of the church and the world? Why must we understand both? Q2: What is the significance of understanding communication mediums? How are these insights valuable to your research interest? Q3: How is McLuhan relevant to the future of Strategic Communication philosophy? What two aspects of his ideas should be reconsidered in this historical moment? Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the SafeAssign plagiarism tool.
Answer Below:
IntroductionWalter xxx in xxx book xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx has xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxx has xxxxxxxxx In xxx writing xx has xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx as xxx key xx literacy xxxx the xxxxxx or xxxx exchange xx communication xx his xxxxxxx he xxx expressed xxx belief xx how xxxxxxxxxxxxx through xxxxxxx format xxxxxxxx people xxx provides xxxx with x sense xx literacy xxxx Knowledge xxxxxxxxx through xxxxxxx holds xxxxxxxxxxxx within xxx human xxxxx and xxxx adapt xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx every xxxx that xxxx have xxxx Writing xxxxxxx within xxx human xxxxx and xxxxxxxx critical xxxxxxxx within x person xxxxx gives xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx With xxx collaboration xx technology xxx writing xxxxxxxxx could xxx spread xxxx vast xxxxxx who xxx not xxxxxxxx with xxxx from xxx thesis xx this xxxxxxxx is xxxxx on xxxxxxxxx communication xxxx of xxxxxxxx focuses xx The xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx communication xxxx had xxxxx place xx society xxxxxxxxxxx secondary xxxxxxx has xxxxxx over xxxx Ideologies xxxxxx Ong xxxxx on xx the xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx communication xxx transition xx strategic xxxxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx Ong xxx an xxxxxxxx historian xxx philosopher xxxxx area xx interest xxx to xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx Walter xxx invested xxxx in xxxx area xxx was xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxx for xxxx transformation xxxxx beings xxx present xx earth xxx more xxxx about xxxxxxx years xxxxx and xxxxxxxx is xxx first xxxx which xxx adapted xx convey xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx From xxxxx people xxxxxxx to xxxxx and xxxxxxx their xxxxxxxxx Walter xxx stressed xxx factor xxxx writing xxxxx make xxxxxx much xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx to xxxx and xxxxx will xxxx opportunities xxx human xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx communication xxxxxxxx The xxxx of xxxxx beings xxxx have xx evaluate xxxxx reading xxx text xx writing xxx this xxxx help xxxx to xxxxx This xxxxx promote xxxxxxxx within xxxxxx and xxxxx help xxxx to xxxx knowledge xxxx technology xxx introduced xx society xxxxxx fear xxxx it xxxxx destroy xxxxx ability xx write xxx would xxxx people xxxx Walter xxx demonstrated xxxxxxx his xxxxxxx that xxxx language xxxxxxxx communication xxxxxxx enhanced xxxxxxxx implementation xx the xxxxxxxxxx would xxxx enhance xxxxxxxxxxxxx within xxxxxx Many xxxxxxxxxx worlds xxxxx get xxxxxxx from xxxx technology xx it xxxxx help xx establish xxxxxxxxxxxxx within xxxxxx over x vast xxxx Superiority xxxxxxxxx orality xxx gained xxxx timeSecondary xxxxxxx is xxxxxxx as xxx oral xxxxxxxxxx of xxx knowledge xxxx is xxxxxxxxx from xxxxxxx This xxxxx when xxxxxxx reads x written xxxxxx aloud xx a xxxxx group xx people xx over xx electronic xxxxxx that xxxxx reach xxxxxxxx people xxxx that xx read xxxx television xx radio xxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx any xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx knowledge xxx is xxxxxxxxxx under xxxx form xx literacy xxxx Secondary xxxxxxx holds x vast xxxxxxxxxx from xxxxxxx orality xxx there xx no xxxxxxxxxx between xxxx Primary xxxxxxx conveys x source xx knowledge xxxx does xxx have xxx written xxxxxx but xx passed xxxx by xxxx forms xxxx is xxx in xxx case xx secondary xxxxxxx it xxxxxx knowledge xx opinions xxxx are xxxxxxx in xxxxxxx format xxxxxxxxx orality xxxxx its xxxxxxxx in xxx transition xx strategic xxxxxxxxxxxxx Ong xx his xxxx Orality xxx Literacy xxxxxxxxx that xxxx form xx orality xxxxxxx solely xx print xxx written xxxx They xxx the xxxxxxx of xxx transition xx strategic xxxxxxxxxxxxx that xxxx place xx is xxxxxxxxxx as xxx post-literacy xxxxxxx This xxxxx how xxxxxxxxxx has xxxxx a xxxxx part xx communication xxx people xxx using xxxxx literacy xx communicate xxxx people xxxxxxx Technologies xxxx print xxxxxxxxxx radio xxxxxxxx etc xxxxxxx literacy xx understand xxx knowledge xxxx is xxxxxxxx To xxxxxxxxx communication xxxxxx society xxxxxx need xx hold xxxxxxxx that xxxx direct xxxx to xxx and xxxxxxxxxx this xxxxxxxxxx enhancing xxxxx literacy xxxxxxxxxx Walter xxx holds xx to xxx future xx strategic xxxxxxxxxxxxx Orality xxx Literacy xxxxxxxxx by xxxxxx Ong xxxxxxxx the xxxx that xxxxxxx will xxxx in xxx expansion xx knowledge xxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxx of xxx technology xxxxx help xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxx society xxxx of xxxxx factors xxxx increase xxx literacy xxxx of xxx society xxx using xxxxx and xxxxx media xxxxx enhance xxxxxxxxxxxxx within xxxxxx Ong xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx has xxxxxxxx due xx interference xx print xxx writing xxxxx The xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx depends xx technology xxx people xxx have xxx literacy xx read xxx write xxxx be xxxx to xxx this xxxxxxxxxx as xxx information xxxx is xxxxxxxx through xxxx medium xxxxxxxxxxxxxx this xxxxx it xxx be xxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx have xxxxxx an xxxxxxxxx part xx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx between xxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxxxx that xxx being xxxx no xxxxxx could xx used xx people xxx do xxx possess xxx ability xx read xxx write xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx helped xxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx communication xx the xxxxx and xxxxxx are xxx more xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx parts xx the xxxxx ReferencesBest x Walter x Ong xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx Public xxxxxxx - xxxxx read xxxxxxxxxx edu xxxxxxxxxxxxxx article- xxxxxxxx Farrell x Hamid xxxxxxx s xxxxxxx Orality xxxxxxxx and xxx Great xxxxxx in xxxxxxxx Values xxxxx conservancy xxx edu xxxxxx HEYD x Tertiary xxxxxxx New xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx CMC xxxxx angl xxxxxxx verlag xx data xxxxxxx pdf xxx Hoffjann x The xxxxxxxxxx as x player xxxxxxxxx strategic xxxxxxxxxxxxx as x play xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxx Inquiry x https xxxxxxxx sagepub xxx doi xxx Ong x Orality xxx literacy xxx technologizing xx the xxxxx New xxxx NY xxxxxxxxxx ISBNMore Articles From Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
