Question.4914 - Week 5 Case Discussion ReflectionDetailsAssignment ObjectiveThe purpose of this assignment is for you to demonstrate your ability to synthesize information learned from others to enhance your capacity to formulate answers to case questions.InstructionsTo complete your assignment, complete the three steps below for each of this week's case discussion questions:1. Carefully review your own original post and reply posts from fellow discussants for each .2. Carefully review original posts of other discussants.3. Identify and briefly discuss two major points from own original post that you would modify OR would not modify based on what you learned from the original posts and reply posts of members of your discussion group. Provide specific evidence for modifying or not modifying each point. Put another way, what would you change or not change about your original post, after reviewing what others wrote. In either case, provide specific evidence for your choice.Use outline below to format your paper:Case Discussion Reflection: Week ___Q1- Original Post: [paste your original post here]First point you would change or not change and why: Second point you would/would not change and why: Q2- Original Post: [paste your original post here]First point you would/would not change and why: Second point you would/would not change and why:Your reflection for each discussion question should be 150 to 200 words, not including your pasted original post.
Answer Below:
MGMT6200Case Discussion Reflection: Week 5 Q1 - Original Post:Reason(s) for Reversed Relationships:With 85% market share out of proportion for the nat...
MGMT xxxx Discussion xxxxxxxxxx Week x - xxxxxxxx Post xxxxxx s xxx Reversed xxxxxxxxxxxxx With xxxxxx share xxx of xxxxxxxxxx for xxx nature xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx hierarchy xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx of xxx respectively xxxx consumers xxx buying xxxxxxxx from xxxxxx However xxxx does xxx translate xxxx actively xxxxxxxxxxx of xxx brand xxxx less x preference xxx it xxxx would xx because xxx sells xx agricultural xxxxxxx not x consumer- xxxxxxxx good xxx thus xxx branding xx not xxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx decision-making xxxxxxx strong xxxxxxxxxxxx by xxx and xxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx promise xxxx market xxxxx despite xxx top-of- xxxx awareness xxxxxx s xx Still xxxxx on xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx Despite xxxx market xxxxx AFM xxxxx to xxxxx awareness xxx preference xxx the xxxxx in xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx long-term xxxxxx and xxxxxx competition xxxx of xxxxx awareness xxxx leave xxx very xxxxxxxxxx when xxxxxxxx behavior xx rising xxxxxxxxxxx from xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx suppliers xxxxxx It xxxx ensures xxxx more xxxxx is xxxxxx by xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx growth xx the xxxxxxxx and xxxxxx leadership xx maintained xxxxxxxxxx levels xx awareness xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx strategy xxxxx the xxx business xx expand xxx marketplace xxx justify xxxxxxxxxx future xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxx activities xxxxx Point xxxxx Not xxxxxx I xxxxx not xxxxxx my xxxxxx on xxx importance xx increasing xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx Several xxxxx agreed xxxx reliance xx market xxxxx alone xx risky xxxxx shifts xx consumer xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx Some xxxxxxxxxxxx also xxxxxxxx additional xxxxxxxx into xxx AFM xxxxx leverage xxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx marketing xx enhance xxxxxxxxx Their xxxxxxxxxxxx reinforced xx original xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxx in xxxxx awareness xxx preference xx crucial xxx sustaining xxxxx market xxxxxxxxx Second xxxxx Would xxxxxx I xxxxx modify xxx argument xxxx AFM's xxxxxxxx is xxx salient xx consumer xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Based xx discussion xxxxx from xxxxx some xxxxxxxxxxxx highlighted xxxx brand xxxxxxxxxx still xxxxx a xxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxx products xxxxxxxxxxxx when xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx against xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx messaging xxxx posts xxxxxxx out xxx consumer xxxxxxxxx efforts xxx shift xxxxxxxxxx making xxxxxxxx more xxxxxxxx Therefore x would xxxxx my xxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxx agricultural xxxxxxxx differs xxxx consumer-packaged xxxxx strategic xxxxxxxx efforts xxx still xxxxxxxxx buyer xxxxxxxxx Q x Original xxxx Strategic xxxxx Decisions xxx Their xxxxxx AFM's xxxxxxxxx strategy xx centered xx an xxxxxxxxxxx approach xxxx leverages xxxxxxxxxxx digital xxx experiential xxxxxxxx to xxxxx brand xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx avocado xxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxx strategically xxxx high-visibility xxxxxxxxxx such xx Super xxxx advertising xx generate xxxx exposure xxxxx supplementing xxxx cost-efficient xxxxxxx activations xxxxx decision xx pause xxxxx Bowl xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx for x comparative xxxxxxxx revealing xxxx digital xxx social xxxxx channels xxxxxxxx similar xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx at xxxx cost xxxx demonstrates xxxxx focus xx optimizing xxxxx investments xxx both xxxxxxxxxx impact xxx long-term xxxxx growth xxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxxx Objectives xxxxx media xxxxxxxx is xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx and xxxxxx its xxxxxxxx market xxxxx by xxxxxxxxxx consumer xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx While xxx Super xxxx provides xxxxxxx exposure xxxxx data-driven xxxxxxxx ensures x balance xxxxxxx high-cost xxxxxxxxxxx media xxx targeted xxxxxxx efforts xxxx strategic xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx maximizes xxxxx impact xxxxx ensuring xxxxxxxxx spending xxxxxxxxxxx AFM's xxxxxxxxxx in xxx avocado xxxxxx First xxxxx Would xxx Change x would xxx change xx argument xxxx AFM's xxxxx planning xxxxxx with xxx business xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxxxxxx posts xxxxxxx affirmed xxxx AFM's xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx high-cost xxxxxxxxxxx media xxxx targeted xxxxxxx investments xxxxxxxx long-term xxxxxx leadership xxxxxxx participants xxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx of x data-driven xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxx brand xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx strong xxxxxxxxxx Their xxxxxxxx validated xx position xxxx AFM's xxxxxxxx allocation xx a xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx step xxx long-term xxxxx success xxxxxx Point xxxxx Modify x would xxxxxx my xxxxxxxxxx of xxx impact xx digital xxxxxxxxxxx versus xxxxxxxxxxx media xxxx peers xxxxxxx out xxxx while xxxxxxx advertising xxxxxxxx cost-efficient xxxxx it xxx not xxxxx replace xxx prestige xxx broad xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx events xxxx the xxxxx Bowl xxxxxx referenced xxxx studies xxxxx brands xxxxx that x hybrid xxxxxxxx rather xxxx a xxxxxx digital xxxxx yielded xxx best xxxxxxx Thus x would xxxxxx my xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx that xxxxx decision xx reduce xxxxx Bowl xxxxxxxx should xx evaluated xx conjunction xxxx broader xxxxx positioning xxxxxxx rather xxxx simply xxxx efficiency
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
