Question.1091 - Write a 3- to 5-paragraphs critique of the article. In your critique, include responses to the following: Which is the research design used by the authors? Why did the authors use ANOVA test? Do you think it’s the most appropriate choice? Why or why not? Did the authors display the data? Do the results stand alone? Why or why not? Did the authors report effect size? If yes, is this meaningful?
Answer Below:
The research article that I have used is "Acceptability of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Tinnitus: A Study with Veterans and Nonveterans. (Rodriguez et.al, 2023)"The research design used by the authors in this study is a cross-sectional design with a mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA). This design allowed the authors to examine the differences in credibility, expectancy, and acceptability ratings of different tinnitus treatment methods among two groups of participants. The treatment methods are CBT, MBSR, and TRT, and the participants groups are veterans and nonveterans (Rodriguez et al., 2023). When analysing the data, the authors employed ANOVA tests because there were several independent variables, including veteran status and treatment type, as well as several dependent variables, including credibility, expectation, and acceptance ratings. ANOVA was an appropriate choice for this study's analysis because the authors compared the means of various groups (veterans vs. nonveterans and three distinct treatment methods) for each outcome variable. The mixed-model ANOVA was utilized in this instance to take into consideration both within-group and between-group variability. Yes, the authors have displayed data (Rodriguez et al., 2023). The results presented in the article indicate that there were significant main effects of veteran status and treatment on credibility, expectancy, and acceptability ratings. To fully evaluate the significance and practical importance of the findings, one would need to review the complete study, including the actual ANOVA results and effect sizes, if reported. With information about effect sizes, it is easier to determine the practical significance of the differences reported in the study. It would be meaningful to report effect sizes to provide a better understanding of the clinical or practical relevance of the observed differences. References Rodriguez, C. R., Piccirillo, J. F., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2023). Acceptability of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Tinnitus: A Study with Veterans and Nonveterans. American Journal of Audiology, 32(3), 593-603.More Articles From Statistics
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
