Question.1896 - Literature and Composition Rubric | Rubric Guide Essay #1: Explication de Texte Text: Kate Chopin’s “Th e Story of an Hour” Genre: Short Story / Prose / Fiction Weight: 20% Percent of Final Grade Length: 2 pages, not including Works Cited Page NoOutside Sources areAllowed. Students will write a draf t, complete a peer review, and finalize a two-page paper that answers the following riddle: A window, a blue sky, and a heart af f liction are all employed in "Th e Story of an Hour" to form an argument about love and freedom. Select one dominant theme, love, freedom, or both. Articulate in a clear three-point thesis what argument isformed from a close reading of these three objects in the text. How is the argument formed (using what literary element/device)? ? You will rely on the chapter readings from your Arguing About Literature textbook. ? You will rely on the excerpts from the Th eory into Practice textbook read in class. ? Formalism: How To Read Like a Formalist ? Explication: Approaches to Literature ? You will complete a formalist(NewCriticism)reading of "Th e Story of an Hour," driven by your understanding of the elements in the text and how they work together to argue a point. ? You will write an introduction, body, and conclusion with a Works Cited page. ? You will create a three-point thesis that sums up your main idea that directs the body and purpose of the essay. ? Example: Kate Chopin’s short story relies on the symbolism of a window, a blue sky, and a heart af f liction to argue that love _____________________. ? Example: Using three key symbols, “Th e Story of an Hour” challenges readers to see freedom as ____________________________________. ? Essaysthat do not present a three-pointthesiswillresultin an automatic “fail”. *Essays that do not have a Works Cited page will be rejected for performing an act of plagiarism. Submissions that do not meet the page length requirement or manipulate space to increase page length will be subject to a 10 point deduction at the instructor’s discretion.? Th is is not based on a rule of cruelty. Rather, this is a ref lection of the significance of the point value and the intrinsic worth of a thesis statement. Th e thesis is not to be taken lightly. ? You will identify and analyze a significant “part” or “element” of the story, "Th e Story of an Hour". Th at is, what literary feature brings the argument to light? What literary feature makes the argument possible? See glossary and review notes. Successful submissions may choose to look at one “issue” of the text and focus on one for their explication. ? Issues of fact, issues of theme, issues of symbolism, issues of patterns, etc.Issues of social policy, historical and cultural context, and genre may not be used as they require you to go outside the text. ? You will use evidence from the text to support your analysis. Does the text correspond with your verdict on its stance? Can you carefully walk readers through this by examining the most significant proof that your theory is correct? Essaysthat do notcorrectly integrateevidencefromthetextwillresultin an automatic “fail”. ? You will use in-text (parenthetical citations) and end-text citations. You must refer to the MLA Handbook for details. You are responsible for knowing the rules for MLA. ? You will use the vocabulary in your readings to support your answer (See Glossary Page of Th eory in Practice) ? You will submit the essay draf t by Sunday, September 18th. ? Draf t only needs an Intro, Your First Body Paragraph, and a Conclusion with Works Cited Page* *Essays that do not have a Works Cited page will be rejected for performing an act of plagiarism. Submissions that do not meet the page length requirement or manipulate space to increase page length will be subject to a 10 point deduction at the instructor’s discretion.
Answer Below:
With love, are there too many boundaries? When forming a bond with someone, you never know anything about that person. Both parties intend to bring peace and happiness to one another; if both decide to move forward, then both parties must carry each other’s weight and embrace each other’s hardships. If one partner tragically died, the other would be left to grieve and mourn the loss. The short story by Kate Chopin, “The Story of an Hour,” focuses on the symbolism of a window, a blue sky, and a heart affliction to argue that love can be a bondage. In the story, Mrs. Mallard was cautiously told that her husband had been killed in an accident; Mrs. Mallard became overwhelmed by the situation and needed some alone time. As she dwelled on the case, Ms. Mallard realized that if she kept up this state of depression, she would miss out on more life and the finer things. Ms. Mallard embraced her hardship and tried to proceed in life, only to find out her husband had not died in the accident, leading to her suffering from heart disease. As you unfold the truth about the story, you realize Ms. Mallard strived for self-identification. She states, “And yet she had loved him sometimes. Often, she had not. What did it matter? What could love, the mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion that she suddenly recognized as the most vital impulse of her being? “Free! Body and soul free!” she kept whispering.”(Chopin) From the story, Ms. Mallard was in love with her spouse but had some judgments and doubts about her partner, almost as if she had lost personal freedom or Ms. Mallard and the window had a deeper meaning. Example: She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment, in her sister’s arms. When the storm of grief had ended itself, she went away to her room alone. She would have no one following her. “There stood, facing the open window, a comfortable, roomy armchair. Into this, she sank, pressed down by a physical exhaustion that haunted her body and seemed to reach into her soul.”(Chopin) This statement shows that Ms. Mallard was heartbroken about losing her husband and overwhelmed about being forced to move on. Ms. Mallard sitting in the chair facing the window with blue skies is a symbol of her grieving but looking to embrace life to come. As the story goes on, it states, “She did not stop to ask if it was or were not a monstrous joy that held her. A clear and exalted perception enabled her to dismiss the suggestion as trivial. She knew she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death, the face that had never looked save with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead. But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her. And she opened and spread her arms out to them in welcome.” (Chopin) “There would be no one to live for her during those coming years; she would live for herself. There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow creature. A kind or cruel intention made the act seem no less a crime as she looked upon it in that brief moment of illumination.”(Chopin) This statement states that Ms. Mallard knew she would be sad again to see her husband laid to rest, yet she loved him sometimes. Often, she had not. What did it matter? What could love, the mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion that she suddenly recognized as the most vital impulse of her being? “Free! Body and soul free!”(Chopin) she kept whispering. Firstly, the theme of a female search for self-identity is represented strongly in the story from the story Ms. Mallard was in love with her spouse but seemed to have lost a part of herself, so in some way, she was searching or finding that freedom again. And yet she had loved him sometimes. Often, she had not. What did it matter? What could love, the mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion that she suddenly recognized as the most vital impulse of her being? “Free! Body and soul free!”(Chopin) she kept whispering.More Articles From Literature
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
