Question.2639 - Journal to Journalism Paper (+ 4%): For this assignment, you must find one recent popular press news article that reports and/or summarizes findings from a peer-reviewed journal article (published within the last 3 years; for example, NY Times, CNN, Fox, etc.). Your discussion should include: (1) the hyperlink to the popular press news article and the original peer-reviewed journal article; (2) A brief description of the popular press news article; (3) Interpret whether the popular press news article reported the findings from the original peer-reviewed article accurately; and (4) briefly highlight the implications of the findings (how are the findings important in the “real world”?). Your paper should be thoughtful, and the length of the main paper should be between 700-900 words. Writing Quality Writing Quality • Organization (introduction paragraph, topic paragraphs, and conclusion paragraph) • Clarity (logical and well-constructed sentences that make it easy for the reader to follow and understand the content) • Free of typos and spelling errors and uses appropriate grammar • Thoughtful 40 Pts Full Marks 0 Pts No Marks Content Content • Hyperlink to popular press news article AND original peer-reviewed article. • Brief description of popular press article. • Interpret whether the popular press news article reported the findings from the original peer-reviewed article accurately • Briefly highlight the implications of the findings (how are the findings important in the “real world”?). 50 Pts Full Marks 0 Pts No Marks Appropriateness • Recent and relevant popular press article (published within the last 3 years; for example, NY Times, CNN, Fox, etc.) • 700-900 words
Answer Below:
Table of content Introduction: 3 Brief description of the article: 3 Interpreting findings from original and peer-reviewed Articles: 4 The implication of the article with a real word: 4 Conclusion: 5 Source links 6 Introduction: In the following report, a recent popular press news article on 'the impact of COVID-19 on research' has been analyzed descriptively. The article included a brief study on COVID-19 and its triggering hinders and challenges that many fields had to face, which resulted in reshaping their ideologies, methodologies, along with their respective collaborations. In addition to this, the report also includes a brief interpretation on consideration for the following article and comparing its findings from the peer-reviewed journal article, to find how relevant is the implications of the chosen article in the real world. Brief description of the article: The specific article about 'impacts of COVID-19 on clinical trials' was published at the corner of the journal perspective of clinical research. The following article is a discussion about how the pandemic of COVD-19 impacted clinical trials. The author of the articles also tried to observe and shared the challenges and hindrances which were faced during the time of research. The articles talk about how at the time of the pandemic, many of the clinical trials were got suspended because of safety concerns along with movement restrictions. The article emphasized the concern about how the clinical research investigations got delayed regarding their results. In addition to this, the author had also investigated the approach of adopting virtual technologies in their clinical trials which helped them to mitigate all the disruptions which were caused by COVID-19 in the first place. The author even emphasized the significance of maintaining patient safety along with data integrity while they continue their process of transitioning to conduct remote trials. The article also includes regulations and the flexibilities which were executed to address the impacts of COVID-19. To conclude, the article highlighted the significance of resilience and the collaboration between the sponsors, researchers along with all the health care providers who addressed all these challenges very bravely to bring advancement in the medical field with the help of their research. Interpreting findings from original and peer-reviewed Articles: The original article on the impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials has some key findings, which are intercepted as followed. The article included disruptions like suspensions of employees and even their termination which happened in the clinical trials because of safety concerns, movement restrictions and allocation of resources. In addition to this, the delay of results in the investigation process affected the growth of the appearance of new technologies in the medical field. The article also included key findings like virtual and distributed trials along with all the regulatory modification and collaborative effects. On the other hand, in the peer-reviewed article, the findings were very similar to that of the original article. The peer- reviewed article also included the verse impacts on the medical field from COVID-19. It however also included how the medical field, especially the clinical trials gained a boom after COVID-19. The peer-reviewed the report article has maintained the quality of the original scientific research and extended their point of view by widely including medical journals of the 20 th century and the upcoming discoveries which are yet to come in the medical field. In addition to this, the article also included all the immediate repressions which the patients as well as the researcher had to bear because of the pandemic. How well the medical field boomed and experimented to have many lives impacted by COVID-19. The implication of the article with a real word: The article "Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials” had a very important binding with the real words. In the “medical field” context, all the disruptions and challenges which the researchers had to face in the clinical trials caused delays in the formation of advanced drugs and their development to save the lives of patients suffering from the pandemic. In addition to this, the concern of patient safety was very crucial in the real work as well, which brought the adoption o a virtual and much more centralized approach to handle the coming challenges. From the article, the heightened part of collaborative effects has also been taken into consideration. In real word context, the collaboration amongst the researchers, health care providers, sponsors and regulatory bodies continued with great balance to overcome all the challenges. By taking action on all the implications, real-world society overcomes the situation of the pandemic and overcomes the fear to maintain enhanced global healthcare facilities with advancements. Conclusion: From the above content, the conclusion was that there were many disruptions and challenges which were being faced by the researchers during their respective clinical research because of the pandemic. Despite all the blindfolded challenges, there were strategies followed to overcome the impact of COVID-19 on society as well as on the global medical field. Source links https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343645/ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/14/health/virus-journals.htmlMore Articles From Communication
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
