Question.5034 - Week 3Supporting OpinionsAssignmentRequired ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 3LessonInstructionsIntroduction"Observation is key to diagnosis, and art can teach students to slow down and really look," said Craig Klugman, a bioethicist and medical anthropologist at DePaul University who is a co-author of a study on using art to enhance the observational skills of nursing students. "A clinician might notice one thing about a patient, such as dirty hands or torn clothes, and jump to conclusions without looking more closely. We found that art can teach students to see both the big picture and small details that can be easily overlooked," he said. In physical examinations, it's important for clinicians to remove this type of bias, explained Klugman, in order to make only evidence-based observations that are free of bias (Krugman & Beckmann-Mendez, 2015).George Washington High School in San Francisco, California, is the site of a mural, “Life of Washington,” painted by Depression-era artist Victor Arnautoff. In 2018, the mural became the subject of controversy when some parents and students wanted the murals removed as racially and ethnically offensive while others vigorously defended the murals (Tucker, 2019)Nancy Truong, a 2013 graduate of the school. “This mural is not teaching students about the history of slavery and indigenous genocide under George Washington or other white settlers. Instead, it is teaching students to normalize violence and death of our black and indigenous community” (Tucker, 2019, para. 4). Supporters argued the historic work is an important piece of art that is actually critical of oppression and imperialism and that destroying it or covering it equates to book burning. “'They should not be removed,' said George Wright. 'Removing them represents censorship as well as a reactionary moment in time'” (Tucker, 2019, More Mural Coverage section ). Do an online search about this controversy (suggested search <California Washington mural controversy>). Be sure to look at the murals, taking careful note of the mural panels contained in them. Should the panels be removed or covered over, or should they stay in place? With whom do you agree, and why?    Think: Ask yourself: What do I see? What do I see that makes me think that? What more do I see? Examine your reasoning. Does it demonstrate the important standards of critical thinking? What are your premises for your opinion? Do you make reasonable inferences from the observed facts? Are your assumptions warranted?  Write: Write a short paper in which you express your conclusion about what should be done with these murals.Be sure to include your reasons and evidence (in the form of references with in-text citations) that supports your opinion. At the end of your paper, include a summary and diagram of your argument. This paper must be no more than 300 words, or about 1.5 pages in length, not including the title page diagram and reference page. Writing RequirementsLength: 1.5 pages1-inch marginsDouble spaced12-point Times New Roman fontTitle pageReferences page (lesson/textbook citation and outside source citation in APA format)GradingThis assignment will be graded based on the W3 Assignment grading rubric below.OutcomesCO 2: Apply argument diagramming techniques to reveal vagueness and ambiguity.CO 3: Analyze deductive and inductive reasoning structures.CO 4: Evaluate arguments by applying standard tests.
Answer Below:
Week xxxxxxxxxx Opinions xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Reasoning xxxx May xx Preserving xxx Life xx Washington xxxxx A xxxx Against xxxxxxxxxxxxx Life xx Washington xxxxx at xxxxxx Washington xxxx School xxx sparked xxxxxxx debate xxx to xxx graphic xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx African xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Native xxxxxxxxx While xxxx argue xxxx the xxxxxxx is xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxx I xxxxxxx the xxxxx should xxxxxx accompanied xx contextual xxxxxxxxxxx materials xxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxx the xxxxxx would xx a xxxx of xxxxxxxxxx and x missed xxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxx critical xxxxxxxxxx thinking xxxxxx Arnautoff xxx muralist xxx not xxxxxxxxxxx oppression xxx criticizing xx His xxx challenges xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx uncomfortable xxxxxx about xxxxxxxxx founding xx bioethicist xxxxx Klugman xxxxx art xxxxxxxx observational xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx deeper xxxxxxxx rather xxxx snap xxxxxxxxx Krugman xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx In xxxx way xxx mural xxx serve xx a xxxx for xxxxxxxxxxx empathy xxx critical xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx Nancy xxxxxx s xxxxxxx that xxx mural xxxxxxxxxx violence xxxxxx is xxxxxxxxxxxxxx however xxxxxxxxxxxxxx matters xxxxxxx context xxx historical xxxxxxxxx can xx misread xxxxxx than xxxxx the xxxxx educators xxxxxx guide xxxxxxxx through xxxxxxxxxxx on xxx injustices xxxxxxxxx and xxxxx relevance xxxxx Supporters xxxx George xxxxxx argue xxxx removing xxx mural xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx and x reactionary xxxxxx in xxxx Tucker xxxx aligns xxxx the xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx freedom xxx the xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx public xxx that xxxxxxxxxx dialogue xxxx when xx s xxxxxxxxxxxxx In xxxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx should xxxx They xxx not xxxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx but xxxxxx commentaries xx it xxxxxxxxx have x responsibility xx help xxxxxxxx slow xxxx and xxxxxx look xx Klugman xxxx and xxxx evidence-based xxxxxxxxxxx free xxxx bias xxxx is xxx essence xx critical xxxxxxxx Diagram xx Argument xxxxxxx The xxxxx is xxxxxxxx as x critique xxx glorification xx oppression xxxxxxx Removing xx censors xxxxxxx and xxxxxx dialogue xxxxxxxxxx The xxxxx should xxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxxx context xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx C xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx D xxx and xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxxx practice xxxxxx J xxx Francisco xxxxxxxxxMore Articles From Critical Reasoning PHIL 347
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
