Question.5529 - In a minimum of two paragraphs that have a minimum of four sentences each, report on an argument that you were in where something was at stake. Paragraph 1: Describe the place where the argument took place and who was involved. Tell what was at stake. What did you say? What point were you trying to make? What did the other person say? What point were they trying to make? Paragraph 2: Reflect on this argument and answer the following questions. How did you establish your authority (ethos)? Did you appeal to their emotions (pathos)? Did you appeal to reason (logos)? Do you recall any fallacies that either you or the other person used? What strategy was most effective for you in the argument? What strategy was most effective for the other person? What was the outcome?
Answer Below:
ArgumentAn argument that comes to mind is with a former romantic interest, with whom we had scheduled a lunch meetup after several weeks of engaging o...
ArgumentAn xxxxxxxx that xxxxx to xxxx is xxxx a xxxxxx romantic xxxxxxxx with xxxx we xxx scheduled x lunch xxxxxx after xxxxxxx weeks xx engaging xxxxxx The xxxxxx was xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx more xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx with xxx agenda xx getting xx know xxxx other xxxxx raising xxx possible xxxxxxxx on xxx relationship xx were xx build xxxx raised xx issue xxxxx my xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on xxxxx since x would xxxxxxxxx not xxxx up xxxxx call xxx when x returned xx it xxx often xxxx To xxxx this xxxxxx I xxx not xxxxxxxxxx I xxxxxxxxx my xxxx of xxx story xxxxxxxxxxxx my xxxx schedule xxxx work xxxx and xxxxxx which xxxx it xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxx be xxxxxxxxx However x emphasized xxxx I xxx genuinely xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx them xxxxxx and x enjoyed xxx conversations xxxx far xx them x was xxx really xxxxxxxxxx because xxxx believed xx the xxxxxx that xx they xxxxxx to xxxx would xxxx wanted xxxx communication xxx them xx feel xxxx secure xx the xxxxxxxxxx I xxxxxxxx adamant xx the xxxxxx of xx schedule xxx that xxxxx open xxxxxxxxxxxxx exists xx overpowers xxxxxxxx availability xx application xx ethos xxx in xxxxxxxxxxx my xxxxxxxx as x healthcare xxxxxx and xxxxxxx I xxx honest xxxxx my xxxxxxxxxxxx and x realistic xxxxxxxxxx of xx time xxxxxx applied xx my xxxxxx evaluation xx the xxxxxxxxxx we xxx and xxxx I xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx we xxxx working xx and xxxxxxx them xxxx I xx interested xxxxx applied xxxx my xxxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxxx being xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx and xxxxxxx did xxx mean xxxx I xxxxxx interest xxx that xxxx communication xxx more xxxxxxxx than xxxx being xxxxx available x found xxx argument xx be xxxxx on x false xxxxxxx fallacy xxxxx for xxx there xxx no xxxxxx ground xx I xxx texted xxx called xxxx frequently x could xxxx shown xx availability xxx since x was xxx doing xxxxxx I xxx not xxxxxxxxxx And xxxxx this xxx in xx books x wrong xxxxxxxx they xxxx clear xxx strong xxxxx their xxxxxxxx On xx side x leaned xxxx on xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx which xxxxxx on xx boundaries xx the xxx of xxxx argument xx came xx with x more xxxxxxxxx plan xxxx involved xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx in xxxxx to xx cognizant xx each xxxxx s xxxxxMore Articles From Humanities
At CoachOnCouch, we are dedicated to delivering top-notch services that help you achieve your goals. We provide tailored solutions that drive results. Contact us now!
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
