Question.1217 - https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0040522/ Find out if you will write a FOR or AGAINST evaluation. This will be set in the People tab under this film's name. You must stay with the group you're assigned to. FOR: Means that you will write a positive discussion of the film. Positive only! AGAINST: Means that you will address what you did not like or did not work for you. If you can't find points you did not like then write 3 points about what would have made it better. Write your evaluation of the film by choosing three points why you liked or disliked the film, choose from the following: Make sure each point is in its own paragraph. Theoretically. Aesthetically. Thematically. Artistically. Politically Or any other points of view you like to address. Support your likes and dislikes with examples and/or quotes from the film and explain why. “I like it" or “I didn’t like it” is not enough. Be respectful and mindful. Choose your words carefully and remember that it is okay to be debatable but not argumentative. If you disagree with anything in a film, make sure you research, and fact check your information before making any claims. Once you are done with your post, if your post was a (FOR), find 2 posts that are (AGAINST) and comment on them. And vice versa, if you are an (AGAINST), find 2 posts that are (FOR) and comment on them. AGAIN…I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY DISRESPECT, BULLYING OR IGNORANCE. Oppressed people will have my support inside and outside of my class.
Answer Below:
Hello Everyone; I would like to discuss in favor of the movie considering the thematical viewpoint of the movie (A Poignant Portrait of Post-War Humanity) as the underlying was to depict the struggle of the ordinary people during the Italy post-war, with deprivation on par with essentials, the importance of a bicycle is conveyed through the desperate search of the antagonist "Antonio," here the cycle implies the hardship behind it to obtain one, more like a symbol of survival tool or even said as a family's hope showcasing the broader societal wounds left by the conflict. Several scenes are intended to instill raw emotions with bleak economic realities and the flicker of resilience; I believe casting played a huge role since employing non-professional actors led to establishing a more realistic outlook with emotions exhibited to the apt level, giving the feel of a documentary that offers a poignant window into the everyday lives of a people grappling with hardship. Secondly, through the artistic lens in terms of neo-realist storytelling exemplifying the primary tenets of neo-realistic Italy with a gritty documentary outlook that drives one to the search for Antoni's stolen bicycle, there are several shots intended to convey the bustling streets of Rome, showing how commercial economy was booming, yet stark contrast between the grand historical monuments and the poverty-stricken underbelly that spontaneously bridges the story to the audience, along the sparse background and natural sounds implies how desperate Antonio was. Lastly, from a political standpoint, the story is a subtle criticism of system inequalities between wealth and poverty wherein marginalized and lower economic classes like Antonio's family are trapped - the depiction is through a bicycle struggle, the same struggle and deprivation drives a certain set of people towards committing a crime against the societal value, the irony is that struggle showcase is faced only by the lower economic class, while the wealthier aren't impact by it - While Antonio's personal plight takes center stage, it serves as a microcosm of larger societal issues, prompting viewers to reflect on the responsibility of leadership and the need for compassion in rebuilding a shattered society.More Articles From Film and Movies
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
