Question.1228 - Film Discussion Guideline and Rubric 12 (Russian Film) https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0488478/?ref_=fn_al_tt_2Links to an external site. Find out if you will write a FOR or AGAINST evaluation. This will be set in the People tab under this film's name. Write your evaluation of the film by choosing three points why you liked or disliked the film, choose from the following: Make sure each point is in its own paragraph. Theoretically. Aesthetically. Thematically. Artistically. Politically Or any other points of view. If you can't find points you did not like then write 3 points about what would have made it better. Support your likes and dislikes with examples and/or quotes from the film and explain why. “I like it“or “I didn’t like it” is not enough. Be respectful and mindful. Choose your words carefully and remember that it is okay to be debatable but not argumentative. If you disagree with anything in a film, make sure you research, and fact check your information before making any claims. Once you are done with your post, if your post was a (FOR) then find 2 posts that are(AGAINST) and comment on them. And vice versa, if you are an (AGAINST) find 2 posts that are (FOR) and comment on them.
Answer Below:
Hello everyone, I would like to discuss against the movie: Thematically, the exploration in "12" delves into the complexities of justice, prejudice, and empathy, reflecting on societal tensions and personal biases within the context of jury deliberation. Considering the lens of a post-Soviet Russia setting, the film tends to depict the universal struggle between judgment and compassion yet sustaining justice, especially towards marginalized individuals such as the Chechen defendant. By intertwining personal narratives and societal issues, the film confronts the audience with questions about the nature of fairness and the impact of historical conflicts on contemporary attitudes. However, while the film effectively portrays these themes, it occasionally aligns toward overblown sentimentality and could have benefited from more subtlety in its execution. Secondly, considering the aesthetics of the movie, Mikhalkov employs a vast gymnasium setting to create a sense of confinement and intensity within the jury deliberation. The positioning of flashbacks tends to add depth to the storytelling by providing context to the characters' motivations and enhancing the audience's familiarity with the case. Besides, the cast contributes to the film's aesthetic appeal, such as the faces and their acting seem to depict what was intended to be conveyed through the embodiment of their characters with conviction and nuance, but the film's runtime exceeds 2.5 hours, leading to moments of pacing issues and occasional overindulgence in dramatic flourishes. Artistically, the classic narrative is set in a contemporary Russian setting while maintaining the essence of the original story by exploring human nature and moral dilemmas, which is complemented by strong performances and evocative cinematography. The incorporation of socio-political commentary adds depth to the narrative, elevating it beyond a simple courtroom drama, but the film's ambitious scope occasionally results in tonal inconsistencies and narrative clutter, detracting from its overall impact.More Articles From Film and Movies
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
