Question.1229 - Film Review Guideline and Rubric 300 - 350 words 12 (Russian Film) See link https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0488478/?ref_=fn_al_tt_2Links to an external site. Watch the assigned film. THEN address these points: Make sure each point is addresses separately. Give a brief plot summary of the film. What genre was the film and how do you support your answer? What is the theme of the film? Type your favorite quote or the scene you enjoyed the most and why. Choose one FORM and address it in your review. Forms are such techniques, cinematography, screenplay, directing, lighting, editing, sound, scoring, acting, etc. What other film, social cause, or events does this film remind you of and why? Other than movies we watched.
Answer Below:
12 Movie Review "12" is a modern adaptation of Reginald Rose's play "Twelve Angry Men," wherein twelve jurors from different backgrounds and social classes are tasked with deciding the fate of a Chechen teenager accused of murdering his stepfather. The movie transcends with the jurors unanimously believing the teenager is guilty, but as they deliberate, one juror, played by Sergei Makovetsky, raises doubts about the evidence and the fairness of the trial; these elements make the movie appear different when staging was on the grounds of Russia. Then, the movie intends to set high judicial tensions through characters expressing personal biases; the jurors confront their own prejudices and preconceptions, leading to a thought-provoking exploration of justice, morality, and the human condition. The film "12" can be categorized as a courtroom drama and psychological thriller. The theme is based on the pursuit of justice, questioning the very nature of truth, showing how perspective plays a vital role and the complexities of human nature, wherein from the standpoint of the jury deliberation process, certain concepts of prejudice, empathy, and moral responsibility are conveyed in an indirect manner, which raises questions about the reliability of eyewitness testimony, the influence of personal biases on judgment, and the importance of impartiality in legal proceedings with an intent to imply upholding justice in society and the inherent flaws within the judicial system. An impactful scene could be When Juror No. 8, played by Sergei Makovetsky, delivers a passionate monologue questioning the integrity of the evidence presented in court, wherein Makovetsky challenges his fellow jurors to consider the possibility of reasonable doubt and urges them to set aside their prejudices and examine the case objectively. The screenplay tends to set a claustrophobic atmosphere within the confined space of the jury room, particularly for audiences from diverse cultures, while at the same time, the scene implies intensifying psychological drama unfolding among the jurors. The pacing of the film is deliberate, allowing each character's arc to unfold gradually while maintaining suspense and engagement. Since the underlying genre of the movie is a courtroom drama, there are several lengthier dramatic takes and close-up shots that enhance the audience's immersion in the deliberation process in order to instill a conveying detail into what the director wants us to know, which amplifies the impact of pivotal moments and character interactions. The film tends to imply certain societal factors like racism, violence, and a flawed judicial system, particularly when looking at the marginalized communities with prejudice and discrimination; certain similar films that explore the complexities of the legal system and human morality, such as "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "A Few Good Men," the film's examination of cultural tensions and societal divisions reflects broader social issues related to identity, discrimination, and the quest for understanding in a diverse world.More Articles From Film and Movies
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
