Question.1135 - Discuss the findings reported in the report, “Motor Carriers, Better Information Needed to Assess Effectiveness and Efficiency of Safety Interventions GAO Oct 2016 Report to Congressional Committees GAO-17-49” The report is located at the following link and in pdf format in the discussion instructions GAO_Gov eval.pdf
Answer Below:
In terms of addressing the requirements for patentability: First, considering Patentable Subject Matter - wherein the subject matter within the scope of being patented is defined by a matter of composition as stated by the Supreme Court that includes physical phenomena rather than abstract ideas, but business processes being non-tangible item can obtain a patent (Karshtedt, 2015).?Secondly, considering utility: with the understanding of previously discussed subject matter, the physical phenomenon needs to be either useful or be an invention (in such case, printed matter can also be considered) such that the patent gets meaning in terms of credibility, but in a scenario where the broader class is trying to be patented in terms of general utility it will not be acknowledged as intellectual property (Trimble, 2016).?Thirdly, Novelty - that is of two parts: "statutory bar" sets a limitation to patents by stating there shall be no public use or sale for the item that needs to be patented. Novelty implies that the item that needs to be patented should not be known or used by others (Karshtedt, 2015).?Fourth, the requirement is non-obviousness; that is, an item's predictable use shall not go beyond the established functions. Lastly, enablement requires the item to have a written description that defines the scope of the item and is easy to read (Trimble, 2016).?Meeting these statutory requirements is essential for a successful patent application since the patent application process involves rigorous examination by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), and applicants may need to respond to office actions and meet additional requirements during the examination process (Karshtedt, 2015). References?Karshtedt, D. (2015). The Completeness Requirement in Patent Law. BCL Rev., 56, 949.Trimble, M. (2016). Patent working requirements: Historical and comparative perspectives. UC Irvine l. Rev., 6, 483.More Articles From Business Law
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
