Question.747 - Try to answer some of the following questions in your literature review. What is already known about your topic? What gaps in the body of knowledge currently exist? What are the major conflicts related to the topic within the industry? Have researchers made recommendations for future research on the topic? Begin your literature review with a strong introduction that includes a discussion about the differences between qualitative and quantitative research methods and which approach you have chosen to follow for your research. Ensure that you evaluate each source thoroughly in your literature review, and provide their finding’s significance.
Answer Below:
Literature Review Michael Kowal Columbia Southern University FIR 4308 Professor Todd CanaleJanuary 18th, 2023 Literature Review In order to understand which methodology is well suited for the research, it is important to understand the possible approach, one being qualitative research, where the researcher tends to address a particular issue in accordance with the real-world context by employing the participants and obtaining their real-world experience on the event such that, the researcher has the upper hand when it comes to incorporating the critical analysis and take on the informed data which does not encompass a significant amount of numerical data. While on the other hand, considering the quantitative approach to the research, where the research is significantly dominated by the numerical set of data, where the primary source of data involves observation in accordance with a formulated hypothesis in order to support the correlational and comparative format of research. However, for the chosen topic of research, it is relative to choose a qualitative research approach since it could provide the possibility of assessing human behavior in terms of natural disasters and interventions by the local fire department. The research conducted by Figueroa (2022), in accordance with the University of Texas San Antonio and the center of Archaeological Research, evaluated the existing fire station at Bexar County on its replacement in terms of its efficiency in serving the natural disaster. The results were in favor of showing that there is a need for a comprehensive prevention model and an urgent need for a complete revamp of the fire department and the emergency addressable models. The outcome also claimed that the existing operating system tends to be old modeled and requires a replacement in accordance with the suggestions from the City of San Antonio, with identification of the backhoe trenching approach to identify the influence of cultural traces on the fire department, such that archeologically it needs to be placed in the region where the team could address the disaster, the region also required to be a place surrounding the higher rate of an expected annual loss, with the need for the new comprehensive fire station, it demands a contemporary model that encompasses three primary objectives which are mitigation of the natural disaster, emergency addressable model and preventive measures. The research focuses on natural disasters because Bexar County is highly subjected to loss in terms of both economic and human fatal rates by natural disasters. Considering the reports from the National Risk Index, Bexar County is the region subjected to a relatively high-risk rating. The County is exposed to an expected annual loss score of 40.89 on the national risk index in addition to a social vulnerability score of 46.12 and community resilience of 54.56 ("Bexar County, Texas. Community Report - Bexar County, Texas," 2022). The report from National Risk Index, the riverine flooding alone has caused havoc in terms of financial loss - the report claims that there is an expected annual financial loss of $38,136,600 in addition to the population equivalence of $34,849,470 ("Bexar County, Texas. Community Report - Bexar County, Texas," 2022). Drought tends to be the highest contributor to the expected agricultural loss of $593,885 ("Bexar County, Texas. Community Report - Bexar County, Texas," 2022). Other natural disasters are causing increased economic loss rates, including Hail and ice storms. It is important to understand the nature of emergency management before deciding on a new model for the fire department, and the emergency situation needs immediate attention and well-drafted planning to approach that is preset along with an adaptable and dynamic approach, which can be addressed with the collaborative model. According to McNabb (2022), who has assessed the existing disaster management model and policies in the United States and across the globe, suggests that a higher rate of efficiency can be achieved if collaborative emergency management, where public sectors like fire departments work with the private sectors who provide strategical guidance in terms of technological advancement. The reports have claimed that over a period of years, Bexar County and similar region which is exposed to natural disasters have been coping with the collaborative model in an indirect way since the help from the local community is uncounted for. The outcome of the report states that post-disaster occurrences that leave calamities are drastically revived by collaborative interventions. The primary notion of the research is to understand the predictability factors of the natural disaster and formulate a comprehensive, collaborative model that aids in helping the communities that are subjected to vulnerability. In order to draft a recovery model, it is important to consider the Crisis remediation framework, where the trigger is analyzed to obtain a quicker understanding of the disaster emergency, which is followed by establishing a crisis strategy (McNabb & Swenson, 2022). It is essential to survey the local and surrounding counties for startups and other entrepreneurs in addition to well-established firms that work in an emergency, disaster management, and fire-related accidents. With favorable insight, the new fire station can collaborate and establish a centralized operational framework in accordance with the fire station. With a centralized collaborative operation, after the trigger, the framework will include a strategy decision, which is later followed by the mitigation process and then implementation that is subjected to dynamic adaptation depending on the calamity. The collaboration model needs to be adapted for the mitigation or prediction of the impact, but when it comes to prediction, it demands a wider collaborative model that includes the entire local community to provide suggestions that will extend connection in terms of the network where contemporary prediction and mitigation technologies can be pooled in to upon a mitigation model that should operate in terms of long-term impact and short-term impact. References Acu?a, L., & Shortes, C. R. (2016). City of San Antonio Fire Station 53 Project Cultural Resources Survey Investigations, Bexar County, Texas. Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State, 2016(1), 111. Figueroa, A. L., & Kemp, L. (2022). Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed Fire Station# 24, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas. Center for Archaeological Research, The University of Texas at San Antonio. Langar, S., Vannette, A., & Lombardi, A. (2022). Perceptions for Natural Disaster Preparedness among Historic Houses of Worship. EPiC Series in Built Environment, 3, 38-46. McNabb, D. E., & Swenson, C. R. (2022). Disaster Management Policies and Practices: Multi-Sector Collaboration in Emergencies and Disasters. Taylor & Francis. Willison, C. E., Singer, P. M., Creary, M. S., Vaziri, S., Stott, J., & Greer, S. L. (2022). How do you solve a problem like Maria's? The politics of disaster response in Puerto Rico, Florida, and Texas. World Medical & Health Policy, 14(3), 490-506.More Articles From Risk Management
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
