Week Unsafe at Any Speed DiscussionRequired ResourcesRead review the following resources for this activity Textbook 5037

Critical Reasoning PHIL 347

Question.5037 - Week 7Unsafe at Any Speed?DiscussionRequired ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapter 14LessonArticlesCen, S. H., Illyas, A., & Madry, A. (2022, December 19). Why can't we regulate social media like previous media?Links to an external site. [Blog post]. Thoughts on AI Policy. https://aipolicy.substack.com/p/socialmedia3 Matthews, L. J., Williams, H. J., & Evans, A. T. (2023, October 20). Protecting free speech compels some form of social media regulationLinks to an external site. [Blog post]. RAND. https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/10/protecting-free-speech-compels-some-form-of-social.html Samples, J. (2019, April 9). Why the government should not regulate content moderation of social media.Links to an external site. Policy Analysis, (865), Cato Institute. https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/why-government-should-not-regulate-content-moderation-social-media# Initial Post InstructionsIntroductionIn 1965, a young and then-unknown lawyer named Ralph Nader published a book called Unsafe at Any Speed. Here is its opening sentence: âFor over half a century, the automobile has brought death, injury, and the most inestimable sorrow and deprivation to millions of people" (p. 1). The book was revolutionary and used in an era of concentration on automobile safety, which continues to this day. Is social media approaching âunsafe at any speedâ conditions? Are the usefulness and benefits of social media outstripped by its harms? Or is it a necessary utility, like electricity or the telephoneâone we cannot do without? For your initial post, address these requirements:Discuss whether you think the harms of social media outweigh its benefits.If yes, discuss how you think it should be controlledâthrough government regulation or through personally responsible use of social media.If no, discuss why you think social media should not be subject to regulation. Regardless of your view, be sure to consider the role of the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. Follow-up Post InstructionsRespond to one of your peersâtry to find someone with whom you disagree. Analyze their post to determine their reasons, then evaluate their post according to the quality of their reasoning. Writing RequirementsMinimum ofâ¯2 posts (1 initial &â¯1 follow-up) Minimum of 2 sources cited (assigned readings/online lessons and an outside source) APA format for in-text citations and list of references GradingThis activity will be graded using the Discussion Grading Rubric. Review: Discussion GuidelinesOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReaderReview the specific grading rubric by clicking on the three dots in the upper right corner. Course OutcomesCOâ¯3: Analyze deductive and inductive reasoning structures. COâ¯4: Evaluate arguments by applying standard tests. COâ¯6: Apply principles of critical reasoning to political, educational, economic, and/or social issues

Answer Below:

Hello xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx Social xxxxx today xxxxxxxxx Ralph xxxxx s xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx in xxxxxx at xxx Speed xxxxxxxxxxxxx widely xxxxxxx but xxxx growing xxxxxxx While xxxxxx media xxxxxx numerous xxxxxxxx such xx connectivity xxxx expression xxx information xxxxxxx I xxxxxxx its xxxxx are xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx these xxxxxxxxxx These xxxxx include xxxxxxxxxx misinformation xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx polarization xxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxx privacy xxxxxxxx As xxx et xx explain xxxxxx traditional xxxxx social xxxxx lacks xxxxxxxxxxx editorial xxxxxxxxx making xx much xxxxxx to xxxxxxxx effectively xxxxx existing xxxxxxxxxx Despite xxxxx risks x do xxx believe xxxx government xxxxxxx over xxxxxxx moderation xx the xxxxxx The xxxxx Amendment xxxxxxxxxx freedom xx speech xxx as xxxxxxx argues xxxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx speech xx platforms xxxx a xxxxxxxxx precedent xxxx could xxxxxx be xxxxxx However xxx idea xx no xxxxxxxxxx at xxx is xxxx problematic xxxxxxx a xxxxxx approach xx needed xxxxxxxx accountability xxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx literacy xxx personal xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Platforms xxxxxx be xxxxxxxx to xx transparent xxxxx their xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx policies xxxxx users xxxxxx be xxxxxxxx about xxxxxxxxx information xxx using xxxxxxxxx ethically xx Matthews xx al xxxxx out xxxxxxxxxx free xxxxxx may xxxxx require xxxxxxxxxxx regulation xx prevent xxxx and xxxxxx democratic xxxxxxxxx In xxxxxxxxxx while xxx harms xx social xxxxx are xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx we xxxx balance xxxxxx with xxxxxxxxxxxxxx freedoms xxxx balance xx best xxxxxxxx not xxxxxxx heavy-handed xxxxxxxxxx regulation xxx through x combination xx responsible xxxxxxxx practices xxx informed xxxx behavior xxxxxxxxxxxxx S x Illyas x Madry x December xxx can't xx regulate xxxxxx media xxxx previous xxxxx Thoughts xx AI xxxxxx https xxxxxxxx substack xxx p xxxxxxxxxxx Matthews x J xxxxxxxx H x Evans x T xxxxxxx Protecting xxxx speech xxxxxxx some xxxx of xxxxxx media xxxxxxxxxx RAND xxxxx www xxxx org xxxx commentary xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx htmlSamples x April xxx the xxxxxxxxxx should xxx regulate xxxxxxx moderation xx social xxxxx Policy xxxxxxxx No xxxx Institute xxxxx www xxxx org xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx why-government-should-not-regulate-content-moderation-social-mediaTop xx FormBottom xx Form