Question.5032 - Week 6Course Project: Argumentative Paper ChecklistAssignmentRequired ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:Textbook: Chapters 12 and 13LessonInstructionsCourse Project OverviewWeek 6 AssignmentThis checklist should be the final step as you prepare to write your argumentative essay. You should have completed your research and thought about what you will write and how you will present it. This checklist will help you to organize your points and make sure you have good support for your argument, as well as an effective response to opposing arguments. Week 6 Assignment TemplateDownload Week 6 Assignment TemplateOpen this document with ReadSpeaker docReaderRequirementsComplete the Week 6 assignment template.GradingThis assignment will be graded based on the W6 Assignment grading rubric below.OutcomesCO: 4 Evaluate arguments by applying standard tests. CO: 5 Evaluate the role of cognitive bias and fallacies of relevance in critical reasoning and decision-making. CO: 7 Create a fallacy-free argument that incorporates principles of ethical decision-making.
Answer Below:
Week xxxx Course xxxxxxx Argumentative xxxxx ChecklistJune xx Introduction xxxx checklist xxxxxx be xxx final xxxx as xxx prepare xx write xxxx argumentative xxxxx You xxxxxx have xxxxxxxxx your xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxx about xxxx you xxxx write xxx how xxx will xxxxxxx it xxxx checklist xxxx help xxx to xxxxxxxx your xxxxxx and xxxx sure xxx have xxxx support xxx your xxxxxxxx as xxxx as xx effective xxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx arguments xxxxxxxxxxxx This xxxxxxxxxx is xxxxx points xx successfully xxxxxxxx this xxxxxxxxxx you xxxx respond xx the xxxxx bold-faced xxxxxxx prompts xxxxxxxxx What xxxxxxxx am x answering xxxxxx Should xxx United xxxxxx create x structured xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxx immigrants xxxx is xx conclusion xxx example xxxxxxxxx the xxxxxx is xxx a xxxx idea xxxxxx Yes xxx United xxxxxx should xxxxxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxx pathway xx citizenship xxx undocumented xxxxxxxxxx because xx would xxxxxx exploitation xxxxxxxx tax xxxxxxx enhance xxxxxxxx security xxx promote xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx stability xxxx are xx reasons xxxx briefly xxxxx your xxxxxxxxxx as xxxxxxxxx and xxxx reasons xx because xxxxxxx undocumented xxxxxxxxxx contribute xxxxxxxxxxxxx to xxx U x economy xxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx a xxxxx legal xxxxxxx would xxxxxx exploitation xxx legal xxxxxxxxx while xxxxxxxxxx tax xxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxx safetyBECAUSE xxxxxxxxxxx enhances xxxxxx stability xxxxxxxxx integration xxx national xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx the x S xxxxxx implement x structured xxx humane xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx for xxxxxxxxxxxx immigrants xx you xxx write xxx the xxxxxxxxxx and xxx reasons xxxxxxxxxx it xxx a xxx words xxxxx why xxx subject xx important xxx have xxx main xxxxxxxx that xxx need xxx an xxxxxxx paragraph xxxx contains x good xxxx map xxxxxx statement xxxx of xxxx reasons xx strongly xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx relevant xxx not xxxxxxxx supportive xxxxx work xxxxxx One xxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxx culture xxxxxxxxx Strongly xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx Reason xxx Pathway xxxxxxx exploitation xxxxxxxxx safety xxx revenue xxxxxxxx relevant xxx supportive xxxxxx Three xxxxxxxxxxx promotes xxxxxx community xxxxxxxxx Strongly xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx Examine xxxx because xxxxxxxxx statement xxx the xxxxxxx you xxxx to xxxxxxx supportive xx your xxxxxxxxxx Suppose xxx of xxxx reasons xx that xxxxxxxxx will xxxxx police xxxxxxxx to xx laid xxx they xxxx be xxx of xxxx and xxx have xxxxxxx finding xxxxx jobs xxxxxxxxx could xxxxxxxxx have xxxx a xxxxxx but xx it x good xxxxxx If xx institution xx fundamentally xxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx harmful xxxx the xxxx that xxxxxx won x have xxxx in xxxx institution xxxx not xx convincing xx opponents xxxx opponents xxxxxx who xxxx to xxxxxx defunded xxxx t xxxxx to xxxx if xxxxxx lost xxxxx jobs xxxx opponents xxxx fewer xxxxxx For xxxx of xxxx stated xxxxxxx list xxx type xx evidence xxx think xxx will xxxx Reason xxx Economic xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx contributions xxxx of xxxxxxxx Expert xxxxxxx e x economists xxxxxxxxxxxx Statistical xxxxxxxx e x labor xxxxxx data xxx contributions xxxxxxx evidence xxxx peer-reviewed xxxxxxx Reason xxx Legal xxxxxxx reduces xxxxxxxxxxxx national xxxxxxxx Type xx evidence xxxx studies xxxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxx residents xxxxxxxxxxx research xxxxxxx documentary xxxxxxxx e x government xxxxxxxx law xxxxxxx Expert xxxxxxx from xxxxxxxxxxx policy xxxxxxxx Reason xxxxx Citizenship xxxxxxxx family xxx community xxxxxxxxxxx Type xx evidence xxxxxxx qualitative xxxxxxxx e x interviews xxxx undocumented xxxxx families xxxxxxxxxx evidence xxxxxxxxx integration xx countries xxxx citizenship xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx data xx community xxxxxxxx Supporting xxxxxx type xx evidence xxxxxx Supporting xxxxxx type xx evidence xxxxxx Supporting xxxxxx type xx evidence xxxxxx For xxxx of xxxx reasons xxx yourself xx you xxxx recent xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx evidence xx support xxxx argument xxxx kind xx evidence xxxx you xxxx Obviously xxx type xx evidence xxxxx be xxxxxxxxxx on xxxxx increases xx cities xxxx have xxxxxxxx police xxxx is x list xx types xx evidence xxxxxxx evidence xxxxxx opinion xxxxxxxxxxx evidence xxxxxxx evidence xxxx a xxxxxx document xxx example xxxxxxx surveys xxxxxxxx papers xxxxxxxxxx evidence x comparisons xx similar xxxxxxxxxx What xx the xxxxxxxxx opposing xxxxxxxx ANSWER xxxxxxxxx a xxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx may xxxxxxxxxxx future xxxxxxx immigration xxx undermine xxx rule xx law xx appearing xx reward xxxxxxxx entry xxx this xxxx of xxx checklist xxxxxx just xxx opposing xxxxxxxx the xxx you xxxxxxx may xx the xxxxxxxxx opposing xxxxxxxx For xxxxxxx in xx argument xxxxxxxxxx defunding xxxxxx a xxxxxx opposing xxxxxxxx would xx that xxxx police xxxxxxxxxxx budgets xxx cut xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx injuries xxxxxxxx How xxx you xxxx respond xx that xxxxxxxx in x way xxxx will xxxxxxxx your xxxxxxxx to xxxxx with xxxx conclusion xxxx at xxx following xxxxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx responses xx opposing xxxxxxxxx Graff xxxxxxxxxxx Which xxx s xxxx work xxxx for xxxx argument xxx claim xxxx rests xxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx assumption xxxx X xxx have xxxx true xx the xxxx but xxxxxx research xxx shown xxxx By xxxxxxxx on x has xxxxxxxxxx the xxxx significant xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx I xxxxx with x up xx a xxxxx I xxxxxx accept xxx overall xxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx I xxxxxxx that x still xxxxxx that xxxxxxx X xxx provided xxxxx evidence xxxx Y xxx Z x research xx and xxxxxxxxx me xxxx instead xxxxxxxx I xxxxx that x still xxxxxxxx that xxxxx it xx true xxxx it xxxx not xxxxxxxxxxx follow xxxx Answer xxxxxxxx applicable xxxxxxxxxx e xxxxxx I xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxx citizenship xxxxx raise xxxxxxxx about xxxxxxxxxxxxx illegal xxxxxxxxxxx I xxxxx insist xxxx structured xxxxxxxx paired xxxx firm xxxxxx controls xxx eligibility xxxxxxxxxxxx e x clean xxxxx record xxxxxxxxxx history xxxxxxxxx ties xxx uphold xxx rule xx law xxxxx addressing xxx reality xx long-term xxxxxxxxxxxx residents x While xx is xxxx that xxxxxxxxxxxx without xxxxxxxxxx might xxxxxxxxx future xxxxxxxxxxxx entry xx does xxx necessarily xxxxxx that x conditional xxx carefully xxxxxxxxx pathway xx citizenship xxxxx have xxx same xxxxxx Graff x Birkenstein x They xxx I xxx The xxxxx that xxxxxx in xxxxxxxx writing xx ed xxxxxxMore Articles From Critical Reasoning PHIL 347
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
