Question.1628 - Evaluate the conduct of Peter Lewiston against the EEOC’s definition of sexual harassment.
Answer Below:
Peter Lewiston’s conduct meets the definition of sexual harassment by EEOC. The EEOC defines sexual harassment as acts that has unwelcome advances, request for sexual favours, verbal and physical conduct that creates an offensive working environment (US EEOC, n.d.). Lewiston’s persistent romantic advance coupled with inappropriate touching created an unfavorable working environment for Gilbury. This qualifies as sexual harassment under EEOC guidelines.More Articles From LAW
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
