Question.5067 - W5-6: It Happended to me (or I read about it). SubscribeWeek 5Discussion Objectives: (CO3) Evaluate the impacts of theory (abstract) on operations (reality). (CO-4) Synthesize the lessons to be learned from a large body of research and writing.Discussion Overview: In this discussion, you will utilize the ancient educational pedagogy of storytelling to better enable yourself and your classmates to understand the content, context, and applicability of the course concepts. Storytelling has been empirically shown to be vastly superior to reading and viewing media with respect to memory retention and enabling learning at the cognitive level. Plus, it's fun. So, here we go: Give an example of a crisis you've been involved in, observed, or read about. How well did leadership manage and communicate during the situation? Did the organization achieve closure, and if so, how quickly and effectively? In your assessment, knowing what you know now, did they consider everything that should have been considered?Discussion Instructions: Tell the story of your incident. Every story has these elements: a hero/protagonist--your subject individual or population; an apparently insurmountable conflict--the event that drew the attention of the media; a painful and sacrificial decision that must be made-typically, surrender, flee, or fight; and based on the choice, a process that is undertaken to achieve resolution. Ensure that your story is in-depth enough so that your peers will be able to provide a scholarly response in Week 6.Discussion Rubric: To receive full credit for a discussion, you must create an original posting, respond to a minimum of two peers, and respond to everyone who has responded to you. These tasks MUST be accomplished during the assigned weeks. There is no point in attempting to have a discussion after everyone has moved on.Discussion General RequirementsWeek 6 Discussion Objectives: (CO3) Evaluate the impacts of theory (abstract) on operations (reality). (CO4) Synthesize the lessons to be learned from a large body of research and writing.Discussion Overview: In Week 5 you utilized the ancient educational pedagogy of storytelling to better enable yourself and your classmates to understand the content, context, and applicability of the course concepts. You gave an example of a crisis you've been involved in, observed, or read about. How well did leadership manage and communicate during the situation? Did the organization achieve closure, and if so, how quickly and effectively? In your assessment, knowing what you know now, did they consider everything that should have been considered?Discussion Instructions: You told a story incident in-depth enough so that your peers were able to provide a scholarly response this week. Respond to a minimum of two peers from the Week 5 Discussion thread and everyone who has responded to you. Ensure that every story has at least one response.Discussion Rubric: To receive full credit for a discussion, you must create an original posting, respond to a minimum of two peers, and respond to everyone who has responded to you. These tasks MUST be accomplished during the assigned weeks. There is no point in attempting to have a discussion after everyone has moved on.Discussion General Requirements
Answer Below:
Hello xxxxx and xxxxxxxxx One xxxxxxx of x crisis xxxx I xx read xxxxx is xxx BP xxxxxxxxx Horizon xxx spill xx s xxx of xxx most xxxxxxxxxx crises xx recent xxxxxxx with x massive xxxxxxxxxxxxx impact xxxxxxxxxx at xx faced xxxxxxx pressure xxxxxxxxxx in xxx initial xxxxxx as xxx situation xxxxxxxx out xx control xxxxxx Communication xxxxxx the xxxxxx was x key xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxx Initially xx s xxxxxxxxxx including xxx Tony xxxxxxx faced xxxxx criticism xxx downplaying xxx severity xx the xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxx public xxxxxxxxxx that xxxx widely xxxxxxxxx as xxxxxxxxxxx or xxxxxxxxxx For xxxxxxxx Hayward xxxxxxxx said x want xx life xxxx which xxxx felt xxxxxx a xxxx of xxxxxxx for xxxxx affected xx the xxxxxxxx U x House xx Representatives xx terms xx managing xxx crisis xx eventually xxxx steps xx address xxx spill xxx stop xxx flow xx oil xxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx was xxxxxx criticized xxx its xxxxx in xxxxxx effective xxxxxx The xxxxxxxx was xxxx as xxxxxxxxxxxx in xxx early xxxxxx and xxxxx were xxxxxxxxxxx messages xxxxxx from xxxxxxxxx leaders xxx entities xxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxx The xxxxxx itself xxxx on xxx months xxx the xxxxxxxxx including xxx cleanup xxx legal xxxxxxx lasted xxx years xxxxxxxxxxx As xxx closure xx did xxxxxxxxxx reach xxxxxxxxxxx with xxx U x government xxx other xxxxxxx but xxx company x reputation xxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx hit xxx public x trust xxx damaged xxx it xxxx a xxxx time xxx the xxxxxxx to xxxxx the xxxxxxx of xxxxxxxx both xxxxxxxxxxx and xx terms xx reputation xxxx a xxxxxxxxxx perspective xxxxxxx back xxxxx were xxxxxxxxxx missteps x more xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxx response xxxx the xxxxx might xxxx mitigated xxxx of xxx backlash xxxxxxxx BP xxxxxx appear xx have xxxxx anticipated xxx scope xxx scale xx the xxxxxxxx nor xxx they xxxx to xxxx a xxxxx pre-established xxxxxx communication xxxx in xxxxx that xxxxx be xxxxxxx activated xxxxxx The xxxxxxx eventually xxx make xxxxxxx to xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx damage xxx contribute xx the xxxxxxx efforts xxx their xxxxxxx reaction xxx crisis xxxxxxxxxx left xxxx to xx desired xxx leadership xxxxx have xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxxxx with xxxxxxx sensitivity xxx they xxxxxx should xxxx considered xxx long-term xxxxxxxxxxxx risks xxxx more xxxxxxxxxx Thank xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx L xxxxxx in xxxxxxxxxxxxx Managing xxx communicating xx the xxxx of xxxxx nd xx South-Western xxxxxxx Publishing xxxxxxxxxxx K xxxxxx communications x casebook xxxxxxxx th xx Routledge xxxxxx H xx Deepwater xxxxxxx The xxxxxx that xxxxx ended xxx Guardian xxxxx www xxxxxxxxxxx com xxxxxxxxxxx nov xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx S xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hearing xx the xx oil xxxxx and xxx company x response xxxxx www xxxxxxx gov xxxxxxx pkg xxxxx hhrg xxxx CHRG- xxxx htmlessMore Articles From EDMG502 Emergency and Disaster Theory