Question.3790 - Final Project: Part 3: Executive Summary and Final Project Submission In Part 3 of your Final Project, you will utilize the provided template to create an executive summary that is a concise overview, providing key information to readers and stakeholders through the distillation of essential points. It’s like a project’s “elevator pitch” for busy stakeholders who need a quick grasp of the project’s essence. Once you have completed your executive summary, you will add it to your Final Project document, which has already been edited and contains Part 1 and Part 2. Submit your Final Project. Analyze the information gained from the interview in order to develop a potential solution and next steps. Then, you will submit your Final Project. To prepare: Analyze the information gained from the interview in order to develop a potential solution and next steps. Incorporate all Instructor feedback from your previously submitted Part 1 and Part 2 as well as the peer feedback from the Module 3 Discussion. Populate the Executive Summary Template according to the instructions. Create a single, 7- to 10-page document that includes Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 of your Final Project.
Answer Below:
Executive Summary Problem or Need In order to fulfill its mission of promoting health awareness and support for marginalized populations, the Florida NAMI association, a non-profit organization, concentrates on mental health advocacy through community partnerships. However, managing diverse partnerships can present challenges, such as divergent goals, resource limitations, and cultural considerations. These obstacles can affect program effectiveness and community engagement, potentially limiting NAMIs ability to fulfill its mission. Therefore, an organized method is required to assess and enhance these partnerships, ensuring the organization’s objectives are in line with community needs. Recommended solution The ABM and CPCM have been suggested as solutions to these issues. The ABM provided a systematic framework for program evaluation, linking resources and activities with desired outcomes, while the CPCM emphasizes collaboration, shared responsibility, and capacity building, fostering strong partnerships between NAMI and promote community improvement. The approach entails establishing clear goals, putting formal agreements, simplifying partnership management, and involving diverse community members in the evaluation process. Solution’s value The suggested system offers several benefits including better cooperation, Accountability and Continuous Improvement, resource optimization, and cultural competency. ABM allows for a structured evaluation process, ensuring programs are systematically assessed for effectiveness with feedback loops for ongoing improvement. By focusing on high-impact collaborations and streamlining partnership management, NAMI can better allocate resources, addressing resource limitations and ensuring sustainability. CPCM cultivates effective partnerships, promoting shared decision-making and engagement with culturally diverse communities, which is in line with NAMI's mission to promote mental health awareness. Conclusion and importance The models offered a thorough approach to assessing and improving NAMI’s programs, ensuring that they remain aligned with the changing needs of the community. In nexus with this, NAMI can successfully carry out its purpose and make a long-lasting difference in the region’s mental healthcare by tackling the issues of conflicting objectives, resources constraints, and cultural factors. NAMI will be able to enhance program results, foster long-lasting mental health advocacy across Florida, and fortify its alliances by using CPCM and ABM. Part 1 Introduction This assignment will analyze the communication partnership consultation model and plan for consulting for the Florida National Association of Mental Illness (NAMI) chapter. NAMI is a non-profit organization that focuses on mental health advocacy and heavily on partnerships with other community organizations. The community partnership consultation model, which emphasizes collaboration between the organization and its community stakeholders, would be the best approach. Justification The Community Partnership Consultation Model (CPCM) has an ecological strategy of planned, systematic process introducing new activities and practices into each organization around a shared vision and mission (Pearrow, Amador & Dennery, 2021). CPCM reflects a collaborative approach, shared responsibility, and capacity building. The success of NAMI has been tied to community engagement through advocacy and education. NAMI ensures stakeholders and individuals affected by mental illness share a similar responsibility in advancing mental healthcare and awareness. As Pearrow, Amador & Dennery (2021) suggested, CPCM is a prevention-oriented method involving forming cooperative partnerships and a systematic problem-solving process. Leadership Qualities Kaye et al. (2020) argue that a successful consultation model entails leadership styles skilled in building and maintaining partnerships and cultural competence. Applying CPCM requires collaborative leadership, cultural competence, facilitative skills, conflict resolution, and accountability that ensure goals are met transparently and ethically (Scott, Royal & Kissinger, 2015). NAMI would require appropriate collaborative leadership with the skill to build and maintain partnerships with various stakeholders in the community. Understanding and respecting the community's diverse cultural, social, and economic backgrounds is vital for building trust and engaging effectively (Valli Stefanski & Jacobson, 2018). Facilitative skills such as encouraging dialogue, participation, and shared decision-making across community partners benefit all the parties and maintain productive partnerships across Florida. Questions for Consultation Interview 1. How do current community partners contribute to NAMI's mission? 2. In what ways do you identify the potential community partners? 3. What are the factors that influence your decision to collaborate with any specific organization or group? 4. Hohavedo community members and stakeholders engaged in developing NAMI's programs and services? 5. What ethical or legal challenges have been faced by this partnership regarding shared responsibilities or confidentiality concerns? 6. How do volunteers affect the partnership, and how does NAMI ensure their ongoing engagement and commitment? 7. What strategies must NAMI use to ensure community engagement is met through their programs? Potential Barriers to Success and Solutions 1. Divergent Goals of Partners Different priorities or goals may affect community partners, creating tension in collaboration (Pearrow, Amador & Dennery, 2021). However, this divergence could affect strategies' alignment and joint initiatives' smooth implementation. To overcome this barrier, engaging in early and transparent discussion could align with goals and expectations, and a clear memorandum of understanding (MOU) could outline roles, responsibilities, and mutual goals for preventing such conflicts and ensuring smooth collaboration. 1. Limited Resources for partnership management Managing multiple partnerships could be resource-intensive and require application in situations of limited staff or financial resources. Overcoming this barrier would require streamlining the partnership management process, focusing on high-impact collaborations, and establishing formal partnership agreements (Scott, Royal & Kissinger, 2015). Utilizing volunteer coordinators and forming a community advisor board could help share the management load and ensure sustained partnership efforts. Conclusion CPCM provides a framework for fostering collaboration between NAMI and its community stakeholders. By emphasizing shared responsibility, cultural competence, and capacity building, CPCM aligns with NAMI's mission of advocacy and education in mental health. Implementing this model with a strong focus on transparent leadership, facilitative skills, and strategic resource management will enable NAMI to address potential challenges and strengthen its partnerships. Through this approach, NAMI can continue advancing mental health awareness and support across Florida, ensuring long-term success and community impact. Part 2 Introduction This evaluation plan will analyze the effectiveness of the Florida National Association of Mental Illness (NAMI) chapter's programs and approaches they have used for the Accountability Bridge Model as the part of program evaluation plan. Considering this, Accountability Bridge Model could be applied for the overall program evaluation considering the framework designed to ensure accountability in counseling and human programs. In nexus with this, this assignment would evaluate the significant concepts and characteristics, rationale for choosing this approach, strengths and limitations of the approach, and cultural considerations managing the overall plan. NAMI is a non-profit organization that emphasizes mental health advocacy through community partnerships. This program evaluation plan for ABM is based on the major concepts and characteristics with the focus on accountability, bridge metaphor, program components, and systematic evaluation process. This program even includes specific evaluation steps such as identifying needs, setting goals, implementing activities, measuring outcomes, and adjusting strategies based on feedback. Major Concepts and Characteristics According to Astramovich & Coker (2007), Accountability Bridge Model (ABM) aimed in connecting the program’s resources and activities with its desired outcomes, using a structured approach for program evaluation demonstrating effectiveness and fostering continuous improvement. Here, the term “bridge” has been a metaphor signifying connection between the program’s current state and the desired state. Similarly, for evaluating the counseling program, ABM could be focused through needs assessment, goal setting, program implementation, outcome evaluation, and feedback and adjustment. Hence, the application of CPCM in NAMI has been based on emphasizing building and maintaining strong relationships between organizations and their community partners. The ABM model thus, provides a structure process for evaluating programs with well-suited for programs in counseling and mental health such as NAMI focusing on evaluating the client-centered outcomes and adapted for various mental health interventions. On the other hand, all stakeholders involved, included community members, volunteers, and healthcare professionals, contributed equally to the decision-making, allowing for a diverse set of perspectives in the implementation of the program appropriately (Kaye et al., 2022). These partnerships have been essential for addressing mental health needs, particularly for the focus on marginalized populations. This model has encouraged programs such as NAMI to enhance their service delivery through active engagement with local leaders, organizations, and community members. Furthermore, this model has even encouraged NAMI stakeholders to collaboratively identify and address challenges and promote sustainable solutions that align with community needs. Rationale for Choosing this Approach ABM has been particularly suited for NAMI since it focuses on community engagement and the collaborative nature of mental health advocacy. It even addresses the effective pattern for aligning with the NAMI's Mission, capacity for engaging with diverse communities, and sustainability and resource-sharing approaches. The characteristics of ABM is well-suited for the NAMI’s mission as it focuses on ensuring accountability with stakeholders and supporting for continuous program improvement refining the program and meeting the relevance and effectiveness of their services. NAMI's mission has been to promote mental health awareness through partnerships and align directly with the ABM’s goal of fostering collaborative relationships with the stakeholders, including community leaders, healthcare providers, and volunteers (Johnston, 2010). Strengths and Limitations of the Approach Applying ABM in NAMI is based on strengthening collaborative decision-making, cultural competence, and capacity building for sustainability. However, this limits the approach of NAMI through resource intensiveness, complex conflict resolution, and diverged goals and priorities. This model strengthens developing local leadership and strengthening community resources, enabling long-term success in mental health advocacy and awareness programs. On the contrary, community partners in ABM models may have different goals or priorities, which could create tension or misalignment in joint initiatives (Belone et al., 2016). This limitation could be mitigated through transparent communication and formal agreements like memorandums of understanding. Similarly, collaboration could be beneficial but could also lead to arguments or confrontations between partners. Effective facilitation and conflict-resolution techniques are utilized to overcome these obstacles. Cultural Considerations Cultural competence has been an integral part of evaluating NAMI's program through the lens of ABM. Similarly, it applies to motivating across respecting diversity, tailoring engagement strategies, and addressing health disparities. In nexus with this, NAMI has been serving a diverse population, including individuals from various racial-cultural and socio-economic backgrounds (Johnston, 2010); ensuring that the consultation model would respect these differences has been vital for building trust within the community. Similarly, different communities may even have unique needs and communication styles that ABM has allowed for flexible stakeholder engagement, ensuring the value of contributions. Utami (2020) suggested cultural consideration of ABM is dependent on ensuring cultural relevance with an understanding of cultural differences, particularly when setting goals and measuring outcomes in diverse. This would generally involve community members from various cultural background ensuring that the evaluation process respects and reflects the community needs. Thus, with the identification of program strengths and weaknesses through systematic evaluation, the Accountability Bridge Model has been supporting the commitment of NAMI for refining and improving its services to extreme level. Conclusion The objective of NAMI, which includes capacity building, community participation, and mental health advocacy, has been well-aligned with ABM. Employing its cooperative and problem-solving methodology, ABM cultivates robust and enduring alliances sharing accountability for advancing mental health care with consideration for ensuring cultural relevance, engaging culturally diverse stakeholders and adapting appropriate evaluation tools. Through local leadership and the assurance of cultural competence, ABM has been making it possible for NAMI to develop its mental health projects and effectively mobilize community resources. However, the strategy has drawbacks such as resource intensity and conflicting partner goals, but these can be overcome with clear and open communication, formal partnership agreements, and efficient management procedures. References Astramovich, R. L., & Coker, J. K. (2007). Program evaluation: The accountability bridge model for counselors. Journal of Counseling & Development, 85(2), 162-172. Belone, L., Lucero, J. E., Duran, B., Tafoya, G., Baker, E. A., Chan, D., ... & Wallerstein, N. (2016). Community-based participatory research conceptual model: Community partner consultation and face validity. Qualitative health research, 26(1), 117-135. Gormley, M. J., Allen, J. P., & Jimerson, S. R. (2024). Advancing Consultation and Family, School, and Community Collaboration. School Psychology Review, 53(2), 115-122. Johnston, K. A. (2010). Community engagement: Exploring a relational approach to consultation and collaborative practice in Australia. Journal of Promotion Management, 16(1-2), 217-234. Kaye, A. J., Pejic, V., Jordan, M., Dennery, K. M., & DeMaso, D. R. (2020). Evaluation of an urban school-based social, emotional, and behavioral health professional development and consultation model. Children & Schools, 42(2), 79-87. Kaye, A. J., Pejic, V., Moffa, K., Jordan, M., Dennery, K. M., & DeMaso, D. R. (2022). Using professional development workshops to support school professionals' capacities to promote students' social, emotional, and behavioral health. Psychology in the Schools, 59(4), 866-880. Pearrow, M. M., Amador, A., & Dennery, K. M. (2021). Community partnership consultation model: A consultative approach for supporting school-based behavioral health. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 31(1), 82-98. Scott, D. A., Royal, C. W., & Kissinger, D. B. (2015). Counselor as consultant. Sage publications. Utami, F. P. (2020). Evaluation of Career Guidance and Counseling Program through Accountability Model Bridge. In PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences). Valli, L., Stefanski, A., & Jacobson, R. (2018). School-community partnership models: implications for leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(1), 31-49.More Articles From Counselling
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
