Question.5460 - A high-end private jewelry boutique, Platinum Elegance (PE), an LLC, prides itself on providing a "luxury experience" to people it considers “high-end” clientele. The boutique has a strict dress code for both employees and customers. As part of this dress code, the business prohibits visible facial piercings or tattoos on the premises, citing its brand image and customer expectations. A customer with facial tattoos and piercings attempts to enter the boutique to browse their offerings but is politely denied entry based on the store's policy. The customer argues that the facial markings and piercings are cultural and faith-related and that PE’s policy is discriminatory and unfairly excludes them from accessing goods that are publicly available. PE defends its stance, claiming it has the right to maintain its business environment and appeal to its target clientele. • Is PE's policy lawful under current anti-discrimination laws? (Consider federal, state, local likely laws - research examples.) • Is it ethical for a business to exclude individuals based on physical appearance like tattoos and piercings? • Should a business’s asserted right to define its store environment outweigh a customer’s right to access goods and services? • Does a business policy like PE's reinforce harmful stereotypes about people with tattoos or piercings, or, is it a legitimate expression of brand identity and business' right to operate as it sees fit? • What is the connection of interstate commerce to a private business’ choice of whom it serves or how it provides the service?
Answer Below:
I am falling into the A–L group, which means your assignment is to argue FOR the proposition. A private business like Platinum Elegance (PE) has the r...
I xx falling xxxx the x L xxxxx which xxxxx your xxxxxxxxxx is xx argue xxx the xxxxxxxxxxx A xxxxxxx business xxxx Platinum xxxxxxxx PE xxx the xxxxx to xxxxxxxxx a xxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx code xxxxx may xxxxxxx limitations xx visible xxxxxx tattoos xxx piercings xx order xx uphold xxx brand xxxxx and xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxx experience xxxx a xxxxx perspective xxxxxxx businesses xxxxxxx considerable xxxxxxxx in xxxxxxx the xxxxxxxxxxx of xxxxx establishments xxxxxxxx their xxxxxxxx adhere xx the xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx laws xxxxxxxx in xxxxx II xx the xxxxx Rights xxx and xxxxxxxx state xxx local xxxxxxxxxxx Allen xxxxxx Tattoos xxx piercings xx not xxxx the xxxx federal xxxxxxxxxxx as xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx such xx race xxxxxxxx or xxxxxx Courts xxxx consistently xxxxxxxx the xxxxxx of xxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx appearance xxxxxxxxx as xxxx as xxxxx standards xx not xxxxxxxxxxxx against xxxxxxxxx classes xx Cloutier x Costco xxxxxxxxx Corp xxx First xxxxxxx Court xx Appeals xxxxxxxx Costco x no-facial-piercing xxxxxx in xxxxxxxx to x religious xxxxxxxxxxxxx claim xxxxxxx that xxxxxxxx its xxxxxxxxxx standards xxxxx compromise xxx professional xxxxx A xxxxxxxx has xx ethical xxxxxxxxxx to xxx stakeholders xxxx as xxxxxxxxx investors xxx core xxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxx the xxxxxx brand xxxxxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx to xxx success xxxxxxxxx et xx Platinum xxxxxxxx functions xxxxxx a xxxxxxxxxxx market xxxxx uniqueness xxx perception xxxx significant xxxxxxxxxx Similar xx how xxxxxxx restaurants xxxxxxxxx dress xxxxx that xxxxxxxxxxx jackets xx ties xx can xxxxxxxxxxx uphold xxxxxxxxxx standards xx meet xxx expectations xx its xxxxxxxxx I xxxxxxx within x utilitarian xxxxxxxxx this xxxxxx enhances xxxxxxx benefit xx guarantees xxxxxxxx satisfaction xxxxxxxxxx brand xxxxxx and xxxxxxx business xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Although xxxx critics xxxxxxx that xxxxx policies xxxxxxxxxx stereotypes x company xxxxxxxxx rights xxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxx as xxxx The xxxxxxx Court xx Burwell x Hobby xxxxx Stores xxx agreed xxxx businesses xxx make xxxxxxxxxxx decisions xxxx reflect xxxxx identity xxx mission xx the xxxx way xx is xxx obstructing xxxxxx to xxxxxxxxx goods xxxxxx it xx asserting xxx right xx create x curated xxxxxxxxxxx that xxxxxx with xxx brand xxxxxxx In xx opinion xxxx both x legal xxx ethical xxxxxxxxxx PE x policy xxxxxxxxxx a xxxxx exercise xx its xxxxxxxx freedom xxx its xxxxxxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxxxx ReferencesAllen x L xxxxxx C xx Privacy xxxxxx a xxxxx Right xxxxxxxx Tech xx Broccardo x Culasso x Dhir x Truant x Corporate xxxxxx responsibility xxxx it xxxxxx matter xx the xxxxxx context xxxxxxxxx Social xxxxxxxxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxx Management x Case xxxxx https xxxxxxxx vlex xxx vid xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https xxxxxxx justia xxx cases xxxxxxx usPaying someone to do your business law assignment has become a practical solution for students managing tight deadlines, academic pressure, and personal responsibilities. Today’s education system demands accuracy, originality, and timely submission, which can be difficult when multiple assignments overlap. Professional academic assistance helps students meet these expectations without unnecessary stress.
When you choose to pay someone to complete your business law assignment, you gain access to experienced academic writers who understand university guidelines, grading criteria, and plagiarism standards. These experts deliver well-structured, properly researched, and original work that aligns with your academic requirements. Whether the assignment involves analysis, problem-solving, or concept explanation, professional help ensures clarity and relevance.
Time management is another major advantage. Assignments often require extensive research and formatting, consuming hours or even days. By outsourcing your business law assignment, you can focus on exams, projects, or other priorities while ensuring your work is completed on time. Quality and confidentiality also matter. Reputable academic support platforms keep your personal information secure and provide plagiarism-free content written from scratch. Many services offer revisions, allowing improvements based on instructor feedback.
Seeking help with your business law assignment does not mean avoiding learning. Instead, it provides a useful reference to better understand concepts, improve writing skills, and maintain consistent academic performance. Paying someone to do your business law assignment can be a smart and efficient academic choice.
.ico)
.ico)
.ico)
